Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Order

C‑257/13Anouthani Mlamali, divorcée Ahamed pour sa nièce Anlia Mlamali v CAF des Bouches-du-Rhône

Decided
2013-11-14
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2013:763
CELEX
62013CO0257
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

The court's own keywords

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Absence of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility.

Interprets

    EUR-LexThe Court

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
    • No sentence written by a language model
    • Engine version and read date on every answer
    • No customer data, no documents, no advice
    • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

    Model cardAudit