EU regulatory register · DORA
Article 6ICT risk management framework
CELEX 32022R2554 · Read on 2026-08-18
Short answer
1. Financial entities shall have a sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT risk management framework as part of their overall risk management system, which enables them to address ICT risk quickly, efficiently and comprehensively and to ensure a high level of digital operational resilience.
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/dora-2022-2554/artikel-6 · Short answer as data · Official text
DORA, digital operational resilience in short
Financial entities must manage ICT risk, report major ICT incidents, test resilience and govern ICT providers by contract.
- Who is covered by DORA?
- What does Article 30 require in ICT contracts?
- How fast must an ICT incident be reported?
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Financial entities shall have a sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT risk management framework as part of their overall risk management system, which enables them to address ICT risk quickly, efficiently and comprehensively and to ensure a high level of digital operational resilience.
2. The ICT risk management framework shall include at least strategies, policies, procedures, ICT protocols and tools that are necessary to duly and adequately protect all information assets and ICT assets, including computer software, hardware, servers, as well as to protect all relevant physical components and infrastructures, such as premises, data centres and sensitive designated areas, to ensure that all information assets and ICT assets are adequately protected from risks including damage and unauthorised access or usage.
3. In accordance with their ICT risk management framework, financial entities shall minimise the impact of ICT risk by deploying appropriate strategies, policies, procedures, ICT protocols and tools. They shall provide complete and updated information on ICT risk and on their ICT risk management framework to the competent authorities upon their request.
4. Financial entities, other than microenterprises, shall assign the responsibility for managing and overseeing ICT risk to a control function and ensure an appropriate level of independence of such control function in order to avoid conflicts of interest. Financial entities shall ensure appropriate segregation and independence of ICT risk management functions, control functions, and internal audit functions, according to the three lines of defence model, or an internal risk management and control model.
5. The ICT risk management framework shall be documented and reviewed at least once a year, or periodically in the case of microenterprises, as well as upon the occurrence of major ICT-related incidents, and following supervisory instructions or conclusions derived from relevant digital operational resilience testing or audit processes. It shall be continuously improved on the basis of lessons derived from implementation and monitoring. A report on the review of the ICT risk management framework shall be submitted to the competent authority upon its request.
6. The ICT risk management framework of financial entities, other than microenterprises, shall be subject to internal audit by auditors on a regular basis in line with the financial entities’ audit plan. Those auditors shall possess sufficient knowledge, skills and expertise in ICT risk, as well as appropriate independence. The frequency and focus of ICT audits shall be commensurate to the ICT risk of the financial entity.
7. Based on the conclusions from the internal audit review, financial entities shall establish a formal follow-up process, including rules for the timely verification and remediation of critical ICT audit findings.
8. The ICT risk management framework shall include a digital operational resilience strategy setting out how the framework shall be implemented. To that end, the digital operational resilience strategy shall include methods to address ICT risk and attain specific ICT objectives, by:
(a)
explaining how the ICT risk management framework supports the financial entity’s business strategy and objectives;
(b)
establishing the risk tolerance level for ICT risk, in accordance with the risk appetite of the financial entity, and analysing the impact tolerance for ICT disruptions;
(c)
setting out clear information security objectives, including key performance indicators and key risk metrics;
The article continues in the official text.
Follow-up questions
Related articles
Articles in other acts connected to this one, with the reason written against the text. The map is a route between acts, not an assessment.
- Intersects with · mutualNIS2 · 21
A financial entity reads risk management in the sector act that takes precedence, and the general article only so far as it is not covered there.
CELEX 32022L2555 · 2026-08-18
Knowledge card
- Applies
- financial-entity: Maintain a sound, comprehensive and documented ICT risk management framework.
- Risk if ignored
- high
- What to do
- Maintain a sound, comprehensive and documented ICT risk management framework.
- Deadline
- No fixed deadline in the register
card:eu:article:dora--art-6 · sha256 d83d15bea023 · Source: NovaCopilot
Risk, sanction and outcome
Art. 6 · financial-entity
Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine · Authority: Competent authority (Article 46)
Decisions applying the provision: none in the register
Full chain (JSON)
Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot
Guidance and secondary law
Authority guidance and the delegated or implementing acts that fill the article, with the primary source at the issuing body. Read 2026-08-31.
- Technical standard (RTS) · EBA/ESMA/EIOPA2024-01-17RTS on ICT risk management tools, methods, processes and policies (JC 2023-83)
The technical standard that fills Articles 6 and 7: what an ICT risk-management framework must contain.
Article 6, 7
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit