EU regulatory register · DORA
Article 28General principles
CELEX 32022R2554 · Read on 2026-08-18
Short answer
1. Financial entities shall manage ICT third-party risk as an integral component of ICT risk within their ICT risk management framework as referred to in Article 6(1), and in accordance with the following principles:
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/dora-2022-2554/artikel-28 · Short answer as data · Official text
DORA, digital operational resilience in short
Financial entities must manage ICT risk, report major ICT incidents, test resilience and govern ICT providers by contract.
- Who is covered by DORA?
- What does Article 30 require in ICT contracts?
- How fast must an ICT incident be reported?
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Financial entities shall manage ICT third-party risk as an integral component of ICT risk within their ICT risk management framework as referred to in Article 6(1), and in accordance with the following principles:
(a)
financial entities that have in place contractual arrangements for the use of ICT services to run their business operations shall, at all times, remain fully responsible for compliance with, and the discharge of, all obligations under this Regulation and applicable financial services law;
(b)
financial entities’ management of ICT third-party risk shall be implemented in light of the principle of proportionality, taking into account:
(i)
the nature, scale, complexity and importance of ICT-related dependencies,
(ii)
the risks arising from contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services concluded with ICT third-party service providers, taking into account the criticality or importance of the respective service, process or function, and the potential impact on the continuity and availability of financial services and activities, at individual and at group level.
2. As part of their ICT risk management framework, financial entities, other than entities referred to in Article 16(1), first subparagraph, and other than microenterprises, shall adopt, and regularly review, a strategy on ICT third-party risk, taking into account the multi-vendor strategy referred to in Article 6(9), where applicable. The strategy on ICT third-party risk shall include a policy on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions provided by ICT third-party service providers and shall apply on an individual basis and, where relevant, on a sub-consolidated and consolidated basis. The management body shall, on the basis of an assessment of the overall risk profile of the financial entity and the scale and complexity of the business services, regularly review the risks identified in respect to contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions.
3. As part of their ICT risk management framework, financial entities shall maintain and update at entity level, and at sub-consolidated and consolidated levels, a register of information in relation to all contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services provided by ICT third-party service providers.
The contractual arrangements referred to in the first subparagraph shall be appropriately documented, distinguishing between those that cover ICT services supporting critical or important functions and those that do not.
Financial entities shall report at least yearly to the competent authorities on the number of new arrangements on the use of ICT services, the categories of ICT third-party service providers, the type of contractual arrangements and the ICT services and functions which are being provided.
Financial entities shall make available to the competent authority, upon its request, the full register of information or, as requested, specified sections thereof, along with any information deemed necessary to enable the effective supervision of the financial entity.
The article continues in the official text.
Follow-up questions
Related articles
Articles in other acts connected to this one, with the reason written against the text. The map is a route between acts, not an assessment.
- Analogous to · mutualGDPR · 28
The requirements on the contract with an ICT third-party provider sit close to those on the processor agreement: instructions, audit and exit.
CELEX 32016R0679 · 2026-08-18
Knowledge card
- Applies
- financial-entity: Manage ICT third-party risk and keep a register of information on all ICT service contracts.
- Risk if ignored
- high
- What to do
- Manage ICT third-party risk and keep a register of information on all ICT service contracts.
- Deadline
- No fixed deadline in the register
card:eu:article:dora--art-28 · sha256 032d0386636c · Source: NovaCopilot
Risk, sanction and outcome
Art. 28 · financial-entity
Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine · Authority: Competent authority (Article 46)
Decisions applying the provision: none in the register
Full chain (JSON)
Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot
Recitals that carry the interpretation
The recitals in the preamble have no legal force of their own but often decide how the article is read. The links are curated against the official text. Read 2026-08-31.
Skäl 74 · Article 28
Third-party risk: concentration risk among critical ICT providers is monitored at union level.
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit