Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Order

C-94/16 PLTJ Diffusion v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Decided
2016-06-15
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2016:461
CELEX
62016CO0094
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

The court's own keywords

Appeal — EU trade mark — Word mark ARTHUR & ASTON — Opposition from the proprietor of the national semi-figurative mark containing the word element ‘Arthur’ — Opposition dismissed.

Interprets

    EUR-LexThe Court

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
    • No sentence written by a language model
    • Engine version and read date on every answer
    • No customer data, no documents, no advice
    • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

    Model cardAudit