Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-742/18 PCzech Republic v European Commission

Decided
2020-09-03
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2020:628
CELEX
62018CJ0742
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

The court's own keywords

Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic – Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 – Articles 19 and 77 – Wine market – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Article 33 – Support for rural development – Area-related aid – Decoupled direct aid – Cross-compliance checks – Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing – Burden of proof – One-off and flat-rate corrections – Doubts concerning the effectiveness of the checks – Risk analysis – Deficiencies.

Interprets

    EUR-LexThe Court

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
    • No sentence written by a language model
    • Engine version and read date on every answer
    • No customer data, no documents, no advice
    • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

    Model cardAudit