Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Order

C-444/22 PLeon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)

Decided
2023-06-13
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2023:493
CELEX
62022CO0444
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

The court's own keywords

Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Non-contractual liability – Law enforcement cooperation – Criminal intelligence – Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-material damage – Action for damages – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

Interprets

    EUR-LexThe Court

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
    • No sentence written by a language model
    • Engine version and read date on every answer
    • No customer data, no documents, no advice
    • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

    Model cardAudit