Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-397/03 PArcher Daniels Midland Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities

Decided
2006-05-18
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2006:328
CELEX
62003CJ0397
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

The court's own keywords

Appeals - Competition - Cartels - Synthetic lysine market - Fines - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Non-retroactivity - Non bis in idem principle - Equal treatment - Turnover which may be taken into account.

Interprets

    EUR-LexThe Court

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
    • No sentence written by a language model
    • Engine version and read date on every answer
    • No customer data, no documents, no advice
    • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

    Model cardAudit