Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C‑122/12 PBernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
- Decided
- 2013-10-03
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2013:628
- CELEX
- 62012CJ0122
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
The court's own keywords
Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 74(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark — Existence of the mark — Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account.
Interprets
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Six fixed blocks, one source per line
- No sentence written by a language model
- Engine version and read date on every answer
- No customer data, no documents, no advice
- Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act