Agent · lonetransparens-2023-970-18
PAY-TRANSPARENCY artikel 18: Shift of burden of proof
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32023L0970 · 2026-08-22 · Weight 67 · minimal-risk
OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.
PAY-TRANSPARENCYOfficial source
- What this page is
- Agent, PAY-TRANSPARENCY artikel 18
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-22Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does PAY-TRANSPARENCY Article 18 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
PAY-TRANSPARENCY Article 18 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 6 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-22 against CELEX 32023L0970. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
PAY-TRANSPARENCY Article 18Checked against the publisher 2026-08-22Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. Member States shall take the appropriate measures, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when workers who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal pay has not been applied to them establish before a competent authority or national court facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove t…
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. Member States shall ensure that, in administrative procedures or court proceedings regarding alleged direct or indirect discrimination in relation to pay, where an employer has not implemented the pay transparency obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, it is for the employer to prove that there has been no such discrimination.
- Paragraph 3 applies. The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply where the employer proves that the infringement of the obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 was manifestly unintentional and of a minor character.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. Member States shall take the appropriate measures, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when workers who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal pay has not been applied to them establish before a competent authority or national court facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove t…
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. Member States shall ensure that, in administrative procedures or court proceedings regarding alleged direct or indirect discrimination in relation to pay, where an employer has not implemented the pay transparency obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, it is for the employer to prove that there has been no such discrimination.
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply where the employer proves that the infringement of the obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 was manifestly unintentional and of a minor character.
Paragraph 3
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)
Paragraph 4 applies
3. This Directive shall not prevent Member States from introducing evidential rules which are more favourable to a worker who institutes an administrative procedure or court proceedings regarding an alleged infringement of any of the rights or obligations relating to the principle of equal pay.
Paragraph 4
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)
Paragraph 5 applies
4. Member States need not apply paragraph 1 to procedures and proceedings in which it is for the competent authority or the national court to investigate the facts of the case.
Paragraph 5
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)
Paragraph 6 applies
5. This Article shall not apply to criminal proceedings, unless national law provides otherwise.
Paragraph 6
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. Member States shall take the appropriate measures, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when workers who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal pay has not been applied to them establish before a competent authority or national court facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove that there has been no direct or indirect discrimination in relation to pay.
- 22. Member States shall ensure that, in administrative procedures or court proceedings regarding alleged direct or indirect discrimination in relation to pay, where an employer has not implemented the pay transparency obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, it is for the employer to prove that there has been no such discrimination.
- 3The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply where the employer proves that the infringement of the obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 was manifestly unintentional and of a minor character.
- 43. This Directive shall not prevent Member States from introducing evidential rules which are more favourable to a worker who institutes an administrative procedure or court proceedings regarding an alleged infringement of any of the rights or obligations relating to the principle of equal pay.
- 54. Member States need not apply paragraph 1 to procedures and proceedings in which it is for the competent authority or the national court to investigate the facts of the case.
- 65. This Article shall not apply to criminal proceedings, unless national law provides otherwise.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32023L0970 art. 18, Shift of burden of proof. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/lonetransparens-2023-970/artikel-18 (hämtad 2026-08-22, bevis sha256:e40ec7b6901df958, bygge legal-2026-08-25).