Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Agent · lonetransparens-2023-970-18

PAY-TRANSPARENCY artikel 18: Shift of burden of proof

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

CELEX 32023L0970 · 2026-08-22 · Weight 67 · minimal-risk

OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.

PAY-TRANSPARENCYOfficial source

What this page is
Agent, PAY-TRANSPARENCY artikel 18
Checked against the official source
2026-08-22Current
Responsible publisher
ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

  • in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
  • punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6)

Rule tree

  1. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

    Paragraph 1 applies

    1. Member States shall take the appropriate measures, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when workers who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal pay has not been applied to them establish before a competent authority or national court facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove t…

    Paragraph 1

  2. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

    Paragraph 2 applies

    2. Member States shall ensure that, in administrative procedures or court proceedings regarding alleged direct or indirect discrimination in relation to pay, where an employer has not implemented the pay transparency obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, it is for the employer to prove that there has been no such discrimination.

    Paragraph 2

  3. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

    Paragraph 3 applies

    The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply where the employer proves that the infringement of the obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 was manifestly unintentional and of a minor character.

    Paragraph 3

  4. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)

    Paragraph 4 applies

    3. This Directive shall not prevent Member States from introducing evidential rules which are more favourable to a worker who institutes an administrative procedure or court proceedings regarding an alleged infringement of any of the rights or obligations relating to the principle of equal pay.

    Paragraph 4

  5. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)

    Paragraph 5 applies

    4. Member States need not apply paragraph 1 to procedures and proceedings in which it is for the competent authority or the national court to investigate the facts of the case.

    Paragraph 5

  6. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)

    Paragraph 6 applies

    5. This Article shall not apply to criminal proceedings, unless national law provides otherwise.

    Paragraph 6

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

  1. 11. Member States shall take the appropriate measures, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when workers who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal pay has not been applied to them establish before a competent authority or national court facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove that there has been no direct or indirect discrimination in relation to pay.
  2. 22. Member States shall ensure that, in administrative procedures or court proceedings regarding alleged direct or indirect discrimination in relation to pay, where an employer has not implemented the pay transparency obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, it is for the employer to prove that there has been no such discrimination.
  3. 3The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply where the employer proves that the infringement of the obligations set out in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 was manifestly unintentional and of a minor character.
  4. 43. This Directive shall not prevent Member States from introducing evidential rules which are more favourable to a worker who institutes an administrative procedure or court proceedings regarding an alleged infringement of any of the rights or obligations relating to the principle of equal pay.
  5. 54. Member States need not apply paragraph 1 to procedures and proceedings in which it is for the competent authority or the national court to investigate the facts of the case.
  6. 65. This Article shall not apply to criminal proceedings, unless national law provides otherwise.

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (direktiv)
act32023L0970
chapter
article18
paragraphs6
jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)
supervisor
national

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/lonetransparens-2023-970-18/run
methodGET
outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash
Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel
stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:60cec1e5ec24d72188911c80583f2ab2957aebab663240a6d92980524cea7464
scriptsha256:51f0736fb4f448d01a57d874a1a3c558aca54499e022cb6ad7b53af1542e2fae
enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0
agentsha256:30791782bb5a89325e713e71716461797f37c74ae85d46ca08332f0e44911fb6
versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / 30791782bb5a8932

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32023L0970 art. 18, Shift of burden of proof. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/lonetransparens-2023-970/artikel-18 (hämtad 2026-08-22, bevis sha256:e40ec7b6901df958, bygge legal-2026-08-25).