Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · AMLR

Article 35Countermeasures to mitigate money laundering and terrorist financing threats from outside the Union

CELEX 32024R1624 · Read on 2026-08-22

Share this page

Short answer

For the purposes of Articles 29 and 31, the Commission may choose from among the following countermeasures:

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/penningtvatt-2024-1624/artikel-35 · Short answer as data · Official text

Anti-money laundering (AMLR) in short

Obliged entities must know their customers, identify beneficial owners and report suspicious transactions. Cash over EUR 10,000 is banned.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

For the purposes of Articles 29 and 31, the Commission may choose from among the following countermeasures:

(a)

countermeasures that obliged entities are to apply to persons and legal entities involving high-risk third countries and, where relevant, other countries posing a threat to the Union’s financial system consisting in:

(i)

the application of additional elements of enhanced due diligence;

(ii)

the introduction of enhanced relevant reporting mechanisms or systematic reporting of financial transactions;

(iii)

the limitation of business relationships or transactions with natural persons or legal entities from those third countries;

(b)

countermeasures that Member States are to apply with regard to high-risk third countries and, where relevant, other countries posing a threat to the Union’s financial system consisting in:

(i)

refusing the establishment of subsidiaries or branches or representative offices of obliged entities from the country concerned, or otherwise taking into account the fact that the relevant obliged entity is from a third country that does not have adequate AML/CFT regimes;

(ii)

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit