Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · Cyberresiliensakten

Article 58Formal non-compliance

CELEX 32024R2847 · Read on 2026-08-18

Share this page

Short answer

1. Where the market surveillance authority of a Member State makes one of the following findings, it shall require the relevant manufacturer to put an end to the non-compliance concerned:

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/cyberresiliens-2024-2847/artikel-58 · Short answer as data · Official text

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. Where the market surveillance authority of a Member State makes one of the following findings, it shall require the relevant manufacturer to put an end to the non-compliance concerned:

(a)

the CE marking has been affixed in violation of Articles 29 and 30;

(b)

the CE marking has not been affixed;

(c)

the EU declaration of conformity has not been drawn up;

(d)

the EU declaration of conformity has not been drawn up correctly;

(e)

the identification number of the notified body which is involved in the conformity assessment procedure, where applicable, has not been affixed;

(f)

the technical documentation is either not available or not complete.

2. Where the non-compliance referred to in paragraph 1 persists, the Member State concerned shall take all appropriate measures to restrict or prohibit the product with digital elements from being made available on the market or ensure that it is recalled or withdrawn from the market.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit