Agent · ai-act-2024-1689-52

AI Act artikel 52: Procedure

Vad är en agent? Agenter verkställer beslut.

Strukturelt tre: artikkelens egne punkter, ordrett.

Søkes også som: EUs AI-forordning artikkel 52 · forordning (EU) 2024/1689 artikkel 52

CELEX 32024R1689 · 2026-08-18 · Vekt 88 · minimal-risk

PremiumHand written or high weight rule tree. Metered per call at the edge once metering is switched on, at the same address and with the same answer as today.

AI ActOffisiell kilde

Inndata

• in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
• punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7)

Regeltre

1. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

   Paragraph 1 applies

   1. Where a general-purpose AI model meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), the relevant provider shall notify the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks after that requirement is met or it becomes known that it will be met. That notification shall include the information necessary to demonstrate that the relevant requirement has been met. If the Commission becomes aware of a…

   Punkt 1

2. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

   Paragraph 2 applies

   2. The provider of a general-purpose AI model that meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), may present, with its notification, sufficiently substantiated arguments to demonstrate that, exceptionally, although it meets that requirement, the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks and therefore should not be classified as a general-purpose AI m…

   Punkt 2

3. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

   Paragraph 3 applies

   3. Where the Commission concludes that the arguments submitted pursuant to paragraph 2 are not sufficiently substantiated and the relevant provider was not able to demonstrate that the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks, it shall reject those arguments, and the general-purpose AI model shall be considered to be a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.

   Punkt 3

4. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)

   Paragraph 4 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

   4. The Commission may designate a general-purpose AI model as presenting systemic risks, ex officio or following a qualified alert from the scientific panel pursuant to Article 90(1), point (a), on the basis of criteria set out in Annex XIII.

   Punkt 4

5. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)

   Paragraph 5 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

   The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend Annex XIII by specifying and updating the criteria set out in that Annex.

   Punkt 5

6. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)

   Paragraph 6 applies

   5. Upon a reasoned request of a provider whose model has been designated as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk pursuant to paragraph 4, the Commission shall take the request into account and may decide to reassess whether the general-purpose AI model can still be considered to present systemic risks on the basis of the criteria set out in Annex XIII. Such a request shall contain objective, detailed and new…

   Punkt 6

7. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)

   Paragraph 7 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

   6. The Commission shall ensure that a list of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk is published and shall keep that list up to date, without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights and confidential business information or trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law.

   Punkt 7

Hvis ingen regel treffer: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

Artikkelteksten som ble lest

1. 11. Where a general-purpose AI model meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), the relevant provider shall notify the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks after that requirement is met or it becomes known that it will be met. That notification shall include the information necessary to demonstrate that the relevant requirement has been met. If the Commission becomes aware of a general-purpose AI model presenting systemic risks of which it has not been notified, it may decide to designate it as a model with systemic risk.
2. 22. The provider of a general-purpose AI model that meets the condition referred to in Article 51(1), point (a), may present, with its notification, sufficiently substantiated arguments to demonstrate that, exceptionally, although it meets that requirement, the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks and therefore should not be classified as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.
3. 33. Where the Commission concludes that the arguments submitted pursuant to paragraph 2 are not sufficiently substantiated and the relevant provider was not able to demonstrate that the general-purpose AI model does not present, due to its specific characteristics, systemic risks, it shall reject those arguments, and the general-purpose AI model shall be considered to be a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk.
4. 44. The Commission may designate a general-purpose AI model as presenting systemic risks, ex officio or following a qualified alert from the scientific panel pursuant to Article 90(1), point (a), on the basis of criteria set out in Annex XIII.
5. 5The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 97 in order to amend Annex XIII by specifying and updating the criteria set out in that Annex.
6. 65. Upon a reasoned request of a provider whose model has been designated as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk pursuant to paragraph 4, the Commission shall take the request into account and may decide to reassess whether the general-purpose AI model can still be considered to present systemic risks on the basis of the criteria set out in Annex XIII. Such a request shall contain objective, detailed and new reasons that have arisen since the designation decision. Providers may request reassessment at the earliest six months after the designation decision. Where the Commission, following its reassessment, decides to maintain the designation as a general-purpose AI model with systemic risk, providers may request reassessment at the earliest six months after that decision.
7. 76. The Commission shall ensure that a list of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk is published and shall keep that list up to date, without prejudice to the need to observe and protect intellectual property rights and confidential business information or trade secrets in accordance with Union and national law.

Ingen rådgivning. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Sitering: 32024R1689 art. 52, Procedure. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-52 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:0142720b03996e7e, bygge legal-2026-11-02).