AMLR, Article 38, DE
1. Credit institutions and financial institutions shall apply the measures laid down in paragraph 6 of this Article in relation to third-country respondent institutions with which they have a correspondent relationship pursuant to Articles 36 or 37 and in respect of which AMLA issues a recommendation pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article.
2. AMLA shall issue a recommendation addressed to credit institutions and financial institutions where there are concerns that respondent institutions in third countries fall into any of the following situations:
(a)
they are in serious, repeated or systematic breach of AML/CFT requirements;
(b)
they have weaknesses in their internal policies, procedures and controls that are likely to result in serious, repeated or systematic breaches of AML/CFT requirements;
(c)
they have in place internal policies, procedures and controls that are not commensurate with the risks of money laundering, its predicate offences and terrorist financing to which the third-country respondent institution is exposed.
3. The recommendation referred to in paragraph 2 shall be issued where all of the following conditions are met:
(a)
on the basis of the information available in the context of its supervisory activities, a financial supervisor, including AMLA when performing its supervisory activities, deems that a third-country respondent institution falls into any of the situations listed in paragraph 2 and may affect the risk exposure of the correspondent relationship;
(b)
following an assessment of the information available to the financial supervisor referred to in point (a) of this paragraph, there is an agreement among financial supervisors in the Union that the third-country respondent institution falls into any of the situations listed in paragraph 2 and may affect the risk exposure of the correspondent relationship.
4. Prior to issuing the recommendation referred to in paragraph 2, AMLA shall consult the third-country supervisor in charge of the respondent institution and request that it provides its own as well as the respondent institution’s views on the adequacy of AML/CFT policies, procedures and controls as well as of the customer due diligence measures the respondent institution has in place to mitigate risks of money laundering, its predicate offences and terrorist financing and remedial measures to be put in place. Where no reply is provided within 2 months or where the reply provided does not indicate that the third-country respondent institution can implement satisfactory AML/CFT policies, procedures and controls as well as apply adequate customer due diligence measures to mitigate the risks to which it is exposed that may affect the correspondent relationship, AMLA shall proceed with the recommendation.
Version: a8df38259d99a38b
SHA-256: sha256:a8df38259d99a38b8fd4b92b94100be0dc28b97c2be499c9be456f824f7d3546
- Article 1
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Article 4
- Article 5
- Article 6
- Article 7
- Article 8
- Article 9
- Article 10
- Article 11
- Article 12
- Article 13
- Article 14
- Article 15
- Article 16
- Article 17
- Article 18
- Article 19
- Article 20
- Article 21
- Article 22
- Article 23
- Article 24
- Article 25
- Article 26
- Article 27
- Article 28
- Article 29
- Article 30
- Article 31
- Article 32
- Article 33
- Article 34
- Article 35
- Article 36
- Article 37
- Article 39
- Article 40
- Article 41
- Article 42
- Article 43
- Article 44
- Article 45
- Article 46
- Article 47
- Article 48
- Article 49
- Article 50
- Article 51
- Article 52
- Article 53
- Article 54
- Article 55
- Article 56
- Article 57
- Article 58
- Article 59
- Article 60
- Article 61
- Article 62
- Article 63
- Article 64
- Article 65
- Article 66
- Article 67
- Article 68
- Article 69
- Article 70
- Article 71
- Article 72
- Article 73
- Article 74
- Article 75
- Article 76
- Article 77
- Article 78
- Article 79
- Article 80
- Article 81
- Article 82
- Article 83
- Article 84
- Article 85
- Article 86
- Article 87
- Article 88
- Article 89
- Article 90
Source: NovaCopilot