AI Act, Article 92, DE

1. The AI Office, after consulting the Board, may conduct evaluations of the general-purpose AI model concerned:

(a)

to assess compliance of the provider with obligations under this Regulation, where the information gathered pursuant to Article 91 is insufficient; or

(b)

to investigate systemic risks at Union level of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, in particular following a qualified alert from the scientific panel in accordance with Article 90(1), point (a).

2. The Commission may decide to appoint independent experts to carry out evaluations on its behalf, including from the scientific panel established pursuant to Article 68. Independent experts appointed for this task shall meet the criteria outlined in Article 68(2).

3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the Commission may request access to the general-purpose AI model concerned through APIs or further appropriate technical means and tools, including source code.

4. The request for access shall state the legal basis, the purpose and reasons of the request and set the period within which the access is to be provided, and the fines provided for in Article 101 for failure to provide access.

5. The providers of the general-purpose AI model concerned or its representative shall supply the information requested. In the case of legal persons, companies or firms, or where the provider has no legal personality, the persons authorised to represent them by law or by their statutes, shall provide the access requested on behalf of the provider of the general-purpose AI model concerned.

6. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts setting out the detailed arrangements and the conditions for the evaluations, including the detailed arrangements for involving independent experts, and the procedure for the selection thereof. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).

7. Prior to requesting access to the general-purpose AI model concerned, the AI Office may initiate a structured dialogue with the provider of the general-purpose AI model to gather more information on the internal testing of the model, internal safeguards for preventing systemic risks, and other internal procedures and measures the provider has taken to mitigate such risks.

Official source

Version: 45362fc11e1c010b

SHA-256: sha256:45362fc11e1c010b3767c657ba7e930eeb21c48824408a3d4b385a7e91fc24d5

• Article 1
• Article 2
• Article 3
• Article 4
• Article 5
• Article 6
• Article 7
• Article 8
• Article 9
• Article 10
• Article 11
• Article 12
• Article 13
• Article 14
• Article 15
• Article 16
• Article 17
• Article 18
• Article 19
• Article 20
• Article 21
• Article 22
• Article 23
• Article 24
• Article 25
• Article 26
• Article 27
• Article 28
• Article 29
• Article 30
• Article 31
• Article 32
• Article 33
• Article 34
• Article 35
• Article 36
• Article 37
• Article 38
• Article 39
• Article 40
• Article 41
• Article 42
• Article 43
• Article 44
• Article 45
• Article 46
• Article 47
• Article 48
• Article 49
• Article 50
• Article 51
• Article 52
• Article 53
• Article 54
• Article 55
• Article 56
• Article 57
• Article 58
• Article 59
• Article 60
• Article 61
• Article 62
• Article 63
• Article 64
• Article 65
• Article 66
• Article 67
• Article 68
• Article 69
• Article 70
• Article 71
• Article 72
• Article 73
• Article 74
• Article 75
• Article 76
• Article 77
• Article 78
• Article 79
• Article 80
• Article 81
• Article 82
• Article 83
• Article 84
• Article 85
• Article 86
• Article 87
• Article 88
• Article 89
• Article 90
• Article 91
• Article 93
• Article 94
• Article 95
• Article 96
• Article 97
• Article 98
• Article 99
• Article 100
• Article 101
• Article 102
• Article 103
• Article 104
• Article 105
• Article 106
• Article 107
• Article 108
• Article 109
• Article 110
• Article 111
• Article 112
• Article 113

Geographical article agents

Source: NovaCopilot