AI Act, Article 15, DE

1. High-risk AI systems shall be designed and developed in such a way that they achieve an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity, and that they perform consistently in those respects throughout their lifecycle.

2. To address the technical aspects of how to measure the appropriate levels of accuracy and robustness set out in paragraph 1 and any other relevant performance metrics, the Commission shall, in cooperation with relevant stakeholders and organisations such as metrology and benchmarking authorities, encourage, as appropriate, the development of benchmarks and measurement methodologies.

3. The levels of accuracy and the relevant accuracy metrics of high-risk AI systems shall be declared in the accompanying instructions of use.

4. High-risk AI systems shall be as resilient as possible regarding errors, faults or inconsistencies that may occur within the system or the environment in which the system operates, in particular due to their interaction with natural persons or other systems. Technical and organisational measures shall be taken in this regard.

The robustness of high-risk AI systems may be achieved through technical redundancy solutions, which may include backup or fail-safe plans.

High-risk AI systems that continue to learn after being placed on the market or put into service shall be developed in such a way as to eliminate or reduce as far as possible the risk of possibly biased outputs influencing input for future operations (feedback loops), and as to ensure that any such feedback loops are duly addressed with appropriate mitigation measures.

5. High-risk AI systems shall be resilient against attempts by unauthorised third parties to alter their use, outputs or performance by exploiting system vulnerabilities.

The technical solutions aiming to ensure the cybersecurity of high-risk AI systems shall be appropriate to the relevant circumstances and the risks.

The technical solutions to address AI specific vulnerabilities shall include, where appropriate, measures to prevent, detect, respond to, resolve and control for attacks trying to manipulate the training data set (data poisoning), or pre-trained components used in training (model poisoning), inputs designed to cause the AI model to make a mistake (adversarial examples or model evasion), confidentiality attacks or model flaws.

Official source

Version: 6e3c5fb2e0b90c4f

SHA-256: sha256:6e3c5fb2e0b90c4f40ba493d9cb5708d1e940f21047fce23cfb994373412201f

• Article 1
• Article 2
• Article 3
• Article 4
• Article 5
• Article 6
• Article 7
• Article 8
• Article 9
• Article 10
• Article 11
• Article 12
• Article 13
• Article 14
• Article 16
• Article 17
• Article 18
• Article 19
• Article 20
• Article 21
• Article 22
• Article 23
• Article 24
• Article 25
• Article 26
• Article 27
• Article 28
• Article 29
• Article 30
• Article 31
• Article 32
• Article 33
• Article 34
• Article 35
• Article 36
• Article 37
• Article 38
• Article 39
• Article 40
• Article 41
• Article 42
• Article 43
• Article 44
• Article 45
• Article 46
• Article 47
• Article 48
• Article 49
• Article 50
• Article 51
• Article 52
• Article 53
• Article 54
• Article 55
• Article 56
• Article 57
• Article 58
• Article 59
• Article 60
• Article 61
• Article 62
• Article 63
• Article 64
• Article 65
• Article 66
• Article 67
• Article 68
• Article 69
• Article 70
• Article 71
• Article 72
• Article 73
• Article 74
• Article 75
• Article 76
• Article 77
• Article 78
• Article 79
• Article 80
• Article 81
• Article 82
• Article 83
• Article 84
• Article 85
• Article 86
• Article 87
• Article 88
• Article 89
• Article 90
• Article 91
• Article 92
• Article 93
• Article 94
• Article 95
• Article 96
• Article 97
• Article 98
• Article 99
• Article 100
• Article 101
• Article 102
• Article 103
• Article 104
• Article 105
• Article 106
• Article 107
• Article 108
• Article 109
• Article 110
• Article 111
• Article 112
• Article 113

Geographical article agents

Source: NovaCopilot