DORA, Artikkel 29, SE
1. When performing the identification and assessment of risks referred to in Article 28(4), point (c), financial entities shall also take into account whether the envisaged conclusion of a contractual arrangement in relation to ICT services supporting critical or important functions would lead to any of the following:
(a)
contracting an ICT third-party service provider that is not easily substitutable; or
(b)
having in place multiple contractual arrangements in relation to the provision of ICT services supporting critical or important functions with the same ICT third-party service provider or with closely connected ICT third-party service providers.
Financial entities shall weigh the benefits and costs of alternative solutions, such as the use of different ICT third-party service providers, taking into account if and how envisaged solutions match the business needs and objectives set out in their digital resilience strategy.
2. Where the contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions include the possibility that an ICT third-party service provider further subcontracts ICT services supporting a critical or important function to other ICT third-party service providers, financial entities shall weigh benefits and risks that may arise in connection with such subcontracting, in particular in the case of an ICT subcontractor established in a third-country.
Where contractual arrangements concern ICT services supporting critical or important functions, financial entities shall duly consider the insolvency law provisions that would apply in the event of the ICT third-party service provider’s bankruptcy as well as any constraint that may arise in respect to the urgent recovery of the financial entity’s data.
Where contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions are concluded with an ICT third-party service provider established in a third country, financial entities shall, in addition to the considerations referred to in the second subparagraph, also consider the compliance with Union data protection rules and the effective enforcement of the law in that third country.
Where the contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions provide for subcontracting, financial entities shall assess whether and how potentially long or complex chains of subcontracting may impact their ability to fully monitor the contracted functions and the ability of the competent authority to effectively supervise the financial entity in that respect.
Versjon: e25489e054ba08ff
SHA-256: sha256:e25489e054ba08ffc99741cbeef432fb6e36b17c53983f023c6cad76e19bd1c1
- Artikkel 1
- Artikkel 2
- Artikkel 3
- Artikkel 4
- Artikkel 5
- Artikkel 6
- Artikkel 7
- Artikkel 8
- Artikkel 9
- Artikkel 10
- Artikkel 11
- Artikkel 12
- Artikkel 13
- Artikkel 14
- Artikkel 15
- Artikkel 16
- Artikkel 17
- Artikkel 18
- Artikkel 19
- Artikkel 20
- Artikkel 21
- Artikkel 22
- Artikkel 23
- Artikkel 24
- Artikkel 25
- Artikkel 26
- Artikkel 27
- Artikkel 28
- Artikkel 30
- Artikkel 31
- Artikkel 32
- Artikkel 33
- Artikkel 34
- Artikkel 35
- Artikkel 36
- Artikkel 37
- Artikkel 38
- Artikkel 39
- Artikkel 40
- Artikkel 41
- Artikkel 42
- Artikkel 43
- Artikkel 44
- Artikkel 45
- Artikkel 46
- Artikkel 47
- Artikkel 48
- Artikkel 49
- Artikkel 50
- Artikkel 51
- Artikkel 52
- Artikkel 53
- Artikkel 54
- Artikkel 55
- Artikkel 56
- Artikkel 57
- Artikkel 58
- Artikkel 59
- Artikkel 60
- Artikkel 61
- Artikkel 62
- Artikkel 63
- Artikkel 64
Source: NovaCopilot