DSA, Artikkel 21, DE
1. Recipients of the service, including individuals or entities that have submitted notices, addressed by the decisions referred to in Article 20(1) shall be entitled to select any out-of-court dispute settlement body that has been certified in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article in order to resolve disputes relating to those decisions, including complaints that have not been resolved by means of the internal complaint-handling system referred to in that Article.
Providers of online platforms shall ensure that information about the possibility for recipients of the service to have access to an out-of-court dispute settlement, as referred to in the first subparagraph, is easily accessible on their online interface, clear and user-friendly.
The first subparagraph is without prejudice to the right of the recipient of the service concerned to initiate, at any stage, proceedings to contest those decisions by the providers of online platforms before a court in accordance with the applicable law.
2. Both parties shall engage, in good faith, with the selected certified out-of-court dispute settlement body with a view to resolving the dispute.
Providers of online platforms may refuse to engage with such out-of-court dispute settlement body if a dispute has already been resolved concerning the same information and the same grounds of alleged illegality or incompatibility of content.
The certified out-of-court dispute settlement body shall not have the power to impose a binding settlement of the dispute on the parties.
3. The Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the out-of-court dispute settlement body is established shall, for a maximum period of five years, which may be renewed, certify the body, at its request, where the body has demonstrated that it meets all of the following conditions:
(a)
it is impartial and independent, including financially independent, of providers of online platforms and of recipients of the service provided by providers of online platforms, including of individuals or entities that have submitted notices;
(b)
it has the necessary expertise in relation to the issues arising in one or more particular areas of illegal content, or in relation to the application and enforcement of terms and conditions of one or more types of online platform, allowing the body to contribute effectively to the settlement of a dispute;
(c)
its members are remunerated in a way that is not linked to the outcome of the procedure;
(d)
Versjon: afe522648d0a3875
SHA-256: sha256:afe522648d0a38751d1a4ab69d0337b3641735331f124a42e92842e4beaa2b32
- Artikkel 1
- Artikkel 2
- Artikkel 3
- Artikkel 4
- Artikkel 5
- Artikkel 6
- Artikkel 7
- Artikkel 8
- Artikkel 9
- Artikkel 10
- Artikkel 11
- Artikkel 12
- Artikkel 13
- Artikkel 14
- Artikkel 15
- Artikkel 16
- Artikkel 17
- Artikkel 18
- Artikkel 19
- Artikkel 20
- Artikkel 22
- Artikkel 23
- Artikkel 24
- Artikkel 25
- Artikkel 26
- Artikkel 27
- Artikkel 28
- Artikkel 29
- Artikkel 30
- Artikkel 31
- Artikkel 32
- Artikkel 33
- Artikkel 34
- Artikkel 35
- Artikkel 36
- Artikkel 37
- Artikkel 38
- Artikkel 39
- Artikkel 40
- Artikkel 41
- Artikkel 42
- Artikkel 43
- Artikkel 44
- Artikkel 45
- Artikkel 46
- Artikkel 47
- Artikkel 48
- Artikkel 49
- Artikkel 50
- Artikkel 51
- Artikkel 52
- Artikkel 53
- Artikkel 54
- Artikkel 55
- Artikkel 56
- Artikkel 57
- Artikkel 58
- Artikkel 59
- Artikkel 60
- Artikkel 61
- Artikkel 62
- Artikkel 63
- Artikkel 64
- Artikkel 65
- Artikkel 66
- Artikkel 67
- Artikkel 68
- Artikkel 69
- Artikkel 70
- Artikkel 71
- Artikkel 72
- Artikkel 73
- Artikkel 74
- Artikkel 75
- Artikkel 76
- Artikkel 77
- Artikkel 78
- Artikkel 79
- Artikkel 80
- Artikkel 81
- Artikkel 82
- Artikkel 83
- Artikkel 84
- Artikkel 85
- Artikkel 86
- Artikkel 87
- Artikkel 88
- Artikkel 89
- Artikkel 90
- Artikkel 91
- Artikkel 92
- Artikkel 93
Source: NovaCopilot