Article 15: Further harmonisation of ICT risk management tools, methods, processes and policies
agent:eu:dora:art-15 · sha256 cf8b6ba04a95e53d
Turnover framework under the act
The act sets no turnover framework. Penalties are laid down by the Member States.
Affected roles
Not in the register yet.
Affected industries
banking, insurance
Obligations
Not in the register yet.
Article text
The ESAs shall, through the Joint Committee, in consultation with the European Union Agency on Cybersecurity (ENISA), develop common draft regulatory technical standards in order to:
(a)
specify further elements to be included in the ICT security policies, procedures, protocols and tools referred to in Article 9(2), with a view to ensuring the security of networks, enable adequate safeguards against intrusions and data misuse, preserve the availability, authenticity, integrity and confidentiality of data, including cryptographic techniques, and guarantee an accurate and prompt data transmission without major disruptions and undue delays;
(b)
develop further components of the controls of access management rights referred to in Article 9(4), point (c), and associated human resource policy specifying access rights, procedures for granting and revoking rights, monitoring anomalous behaviour in relation to ICT risk through appropriate indicators, including for network use patterns, hours, IT activity and unknown devices;
(c)
develop further the mechanisms specified in Article 10(1) enabling a prompt detection of anomalous activities and the criteria set out in Article 10(2) triggering ICT-related incident detection and response processes;
(d)
specify further the components of the ICT business continuity policy referred to in Article 11(1);
(e)
specify further the testing of ICT business continuity plans referred to in Article 11(6) to ensure that such testing duly takes into account scenarios in which the quality of the provision of a critical or important function deteriorates to an unacceptable level or fails, and duly considers the potential impact of the insolvency, or other failures, of any relevant ICT third-party service provider and, where relevant, the political risks in the respective providers’ jurisdictions;
(f)
specify further the components of the ICT response and recovery plans referred to in Article 11(3);
(g)
Machine-readable formThe article in the registerChangesSource: NovaCopilot