{"schema_version":1,"fetched_at":"2026-09-29","license":"Fri återanvändning med källraden Source: NovaCopilot","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","powered_by":"Powered by NovaCopilot","id":"provision:se:las:41","jurisdiction":"se","law":{"key":"las","title":"Lag (1982:80) om anställningsskydd","official_id":"SFS 1982:80","official_url":"https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/_sfs-1982-80/","version_note":"Ändrad t.o.m. SFS 2022:836"},"label":"41 §","heading":null,"chapter":null,"in_force_from":null,"in_force_until":null,"text":"Den som vill kräva skadestånd eller framställa annat fordringsanspråk som grundar sig på bestämmelserna i denna lag skall underrätta motparten om detta inom fyra månader från den tidpunkt då den skadegörande handlingen företogs eller fordringen förföll till betalning. Har en arbetstagare inte fått något sådant besked om skadeståndstalan som avses i 8 § andra stycket eller 19 § andra stycket, räknas tiden i stället från den dag då anställningen upphörde. Avser arbetstagarens yrkande brott mot 4 § första stycket, räknas tidsfristen från anställningstidens utgång. Avser arbetstagarens yrkande brott mot 6 f § räknas tidsfristen från den dag då någon anställdes på den lediga anställningen.\n\nHar inom underrättelsetiden påkallats förhandling rörande tvistefrågan enligt lagen (1976:580) om medbestämmande i arbetslivet eller med stöd av kollektivavtal, skall talan väckas inom fyra månader efter det att förhandlingen avslutades. I annat fall skall talan väckas inom fyra månader efter det att tiden för underrättelse gick ut. Lag (2006:439).","sha256":"88ef9365e003ac4d09143f2f4c8e15e7e2c6f7a1ecc3268dee7e9e4a57c08f39","hash_input":"sha256 över fältet text i UTF-8","verified":true,"url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/lagtext/se/las/41","answers_from_here":{"note":"Ready answers built on this material. Answer from NovaCopilot, with source and provision.","questions":[],"questions_index":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/fragor/fragat","topics":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/topic-node","topic_answer":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/topic-answer?jurisdiction=eu&lang=en&q=","compliance_chain":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/compliance-chain","answers_sitemap":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/sitemap-svar.xml","objects":{"note":"Machine objects for the same material: relations, risk, provenance, law graph, compliance.","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=act:{slug}","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/provenance","law_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/graph/law","compliance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/compliance","objects_sitemap":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/sitemap-objekt.xml"},"source":"Source: NovaCopilot"},"relations":{"label":"41 §","obligations":"not_in_register","practice":[{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2021-11","ref":"AD 2021 nr 11","decided":"2021-03-10","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2021-11","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2021-11"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2017-50","ref":"AD 2017 nr 50","decided":"2017-09-06","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2017-50","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2017-50"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2016-58","ref":"AD 2016 nr 58","decided":"2016-09-28","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2016-58","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2016-58"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2015-56","ref":"AD 2015 nr 56","decided":"2015-09-30","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2015-56","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2015-56"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2015-3","ref":"AD 2015 nr 3","decided":"2015-01-28","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2015-3","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2015-3"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2014-91","ref":"AD 2014 nr 91","decided":"2014-12-17","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2014-91","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2014-91"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2012-38","ref":"AD 2012 nr 38","decided":"2012-05-23","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2012-38","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-38"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2012-28","ref":"AD 2012 nr 28","decided":"2012-04-18","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2012-28","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-28"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2010-20","ref":"AD 2010 nr 20","decided":"2010-03-24","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2010-20","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2010-20"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2007-6","ref":"AD 2007 nr 6","decided":"2007-01-24","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2007-6","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2007-6"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2006-78","ref":"AD 2006 nr 78","decided":"2006-06-28","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2006-78","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2006-78"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2004-74","ref":"AD 2004 nr 74","decided":"2004-09-01","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-74","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2004-74"}],"risk":[{"id":"risk:se:ad-2021-11","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2021-11"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2017-50","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2017-50"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2016-58","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2016-58"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2015-56","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2015-56"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2015-3","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2015-3"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2014-91","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2014-91"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2012-38","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-38"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2012-28","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-28"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2010-20","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2010-20"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2007-6","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2007-6"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2006-78","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2006-78"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2004-74","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2004-74"}],"authority_decisions":"not_in_register","authority_gap":{"reason":"no_authority","authority":null,"decided_by":"Arbetsdomstolen och allmän domstol","sv":"Ingen myndighet beslutar om anställningsskydd. Tvister avgörs av Arbetsdomstolen och allmän domstol, och deras domar visas under praxis.","en":"No authority decides on employment protection. Disputes are decided by the Labour Court and general courts, shown under case law."},"praxis_line":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/praxis-line?jurisdiction=se&act=las","relations_hash":"f1dde5909fafd5041a1478f5fc4020af2e3c8ab19feb02b7c3e50e17292a745e","method":"Deterministisk matchning mot lag och paragraf i registret; inga modellgenererade relationer."}}