{"schema_version":1,"fetched_at":"2026-09-29","license":"Fri återanvändning med källraden Source: NovaCopilot","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","powered_by":"Powered by NovaCopilot","id":"provision:se:las:10","jurisdiction":"se","law":{"key":"las","title":"Lag (1982:80) om anställningsskydd","official_id":"SFS 1982:80","official_url":"https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/_sfs-1982-80/","version_note":"Ändrad t.o.m. SFS 2022:836"},"label":"10 §","heading":null,"chapter":null,"in_force_from":null,"in_force_until":null,"text":"Uppsägningsbeskedet skall lämnas till arbetstagaren personligen. Är det inte skäligt att kräva detta, får beskedet i stället sändas i rekommenderat brev till arbetstagarens senast kända adress.\n\nUppsägning anses ske när arbetstagaren får del av uppsägningen. Om arbetstagaren inte kan anträffas och ett uppsägningsbesked har sänts i brev enligt första stycket, anses uppsägning ha skett tio dagar efter det att brevet lämnades till posten för befordran. Har arbetstagaren semester, anses uppsägning ha skett tidigast dagen efter den då semestern upphörde.","sha256":"c9ff699eebf62e909f9c50aacfeb3872251b0ecb15fab9d1d28277bba51b040b","hash_input":"sha256 över fältet text i UTF-8","verified":true,"url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/lagtext/se/las/10","answers_from_here":{"note":"Ready answers built on this material. Answer from NovaCopilot, with source and provision.","questions":[],"questions_index":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/fragor/fragat","topics":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/topic-node","topic_answer":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/topic-answer?jurisdiction=eu&lang=en&q=","compliance_chain":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/compliance-chain","answers_sitemap":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/sitemap-svar.xml","objects":{"note":"Machine objects for the same material: relations, risk, provenance, law graph, compliance.","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=act:{slug}","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/provenance","law_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/graph/law","compliance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/compliance","objects_sitemap":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/sitemap-objekt.xml"},"source":"Source: NovaCopilot"},"relations":{"label":"10 §","obligations":"not_in_register","practice":[{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2021-3","ref":"AD 2021 nr 3","decided":"2021-01-26","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2021-3","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2021-3"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2017-3","ref":"AD 2017 nr 3","decided":"2017-01-18","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2017-3","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2017-3"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2012-38","ref":"AD 2012 nr 38","decided":"2012-05-23","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2012-38","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-38"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2012-28","ref":"AD 2012 nr 28","decided":"2012-04-18","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2012-28","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-28"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2007-65","ref":"AD 2007 nr 65","decided":"2007-07-04","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2007-65","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2007-65"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2006-123","ref":"AD 2006 nr 123","decided":"2006-12-13","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2006-123","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2006-123"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2004-74","ref":"AD 2004 nr 74","decided":"2004-09-01","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2004-74","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2004-74"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2002-25","ref":"AD 2002 nr 25","decided":"2002-02-20","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2002-25","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2002-25"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-2001-110","ref":"AD 2001 nr 110","decided":"2001-12-19","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2001-110","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2001-110"},{"judgment_id":"se:ad-1997-109","ref":"AD 1997 nr 109","decided":"1997-10-01","court":"ADO","page":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-1997-109","risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-1997-109"}],"risk":[{"id":"risk:se:ad-2021-3","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2021-3"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2017-3","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2017-3"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2012-38","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-38"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2012-28","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2012-28"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2007-65","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2007-65"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2006-123","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2006-123"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2004-74","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2004-74"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2002-25","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2002-25"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-2001-110","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-2001-110"},{"id":"risk:se:ad-1997-109","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=se%3Aad-1997-109"}],"authority_decisions":"not_in_register","authority_gap":{"reason":"no_authority","authority":null,"decided_by":"Arbetsdomstolen och allmän domstol","sv":"Ingen myndighet beslutar om anställningsskydd. Tvister avgörs av Arbetsdomstolen och allmän domstol, och deras domar visas under praxis.","en":"No authority decides on employment protection. Disputes are decided by the Labour Court and general courts, shown under case law."},"praxis_line":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/praxis-line?jurisdiction=se&act=las","relations_hash":"62bbbee7dc501bfba3ce7fe7936a9a840c3b075b937031b21a5a53563e527bff","method":"Deterministisk matchning mot lag och paragraf i registret; inga modellgenererade relationer."}}