{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-162-22",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-162-22)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-23",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:eu:b67bfc",
    "proof": "sha256:9ce719b89e3558bcaa8eeb41daafb3d78924869302fefa3fb358735cd734d635",
    "jurisdiction": "eu",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "item": {
    "schema_version": "1.0.0",
    "id": "eu:c-162-22",
    "jurisdiction": "eu",
    "lang": "en",
    "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "brand": {
      "product": "NovaCopilot",
      "platform": "ExploreWorldAI",
      "infrastructure": "ExploreWorld Legal",
      "infrastructure_url": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
      "legal_entity": "Valkiv Ventures AB",
      "permanent_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/novacopilot",
      "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
      "powered_by": "Powered by NovaCopilot",
      "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/licensvillkor"
    },
    "sections": [
      {
        "title": "62022CJ0162",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber)",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "7 September 2023 (\n *1\n )",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_4",
          "para_5",
          "para_6",
          "para_7",
          "para_8",
          "para_9",
          "para_10",
          "para_11",
          "para_12",
          "para_13",
          "para_14",
          "para_15",
          "para_16",
          "para_17",
          "para_18",
          "para_19",
          "para_20",
          "para_21",
          "para_22",
          "para_23",
          "para_24",
          "para_25",
          "para_26",
          "para_27",
          "para_28",
          "para_29",
          "para_30",
          "para_31",
          "para_32",
          "para_33",
          "para_34",
          "para_35"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Judgment",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "1",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_38"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "2",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_40"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Legal context",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "European Union law",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "3",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "Article 1 of Directive 2002/58, entitled ‘Scope and aim’, provides:",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_45",
          "para_46",
          "para_47"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "4",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_49",
          "para_50"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "5",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_52",
          "para_53"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Lithuanian law",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "The Law on electronic communications",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "6",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_57"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "7",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_59",
          "para_60"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "8",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_62"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "The Law on criminal intelligence",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "9",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_65"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "10",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_67"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "11",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_69"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "The Code of Criminal Procedure",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "12",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_72"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "13",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_74"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "14",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_76"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "15",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_78"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "The dispute in the main proceedings and the question referred for a preliminary ruling",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "16",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_81"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "17",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_83"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "18",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_85"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "19",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_87"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "20",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_89"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "21",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_91"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "22",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_93"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "23",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_95"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "24",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_97"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "25",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_99"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "26",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_101",
          "para_102"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Consideration of the question referred",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "27",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_105"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "28",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_107"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "29",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_109"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "30",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_111"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "31",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_113",
          "para_114",
          "para_115",
          "para_116",
          "para_117",
          "para_118",
          "para_119",
          "para_120",
          "para_121",
          "para_122"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "32",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_124"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "33",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_126"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "34",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_128"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "35",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_130"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "36",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_132"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "37",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_134"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "38",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_136"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "39",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_138"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "40",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_140"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "41",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_142"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "42",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_144"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "43",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_146"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "44",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_148"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "Costs",
        "paragraphs": []
      },
      {
        "title": "45",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_151"
        ]
      },
      {
        "title": "On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules:",
        "paragraphs": [
          "para_153",
          "para_154",
          "para_155",
          "para_156"
        ]
      }
    ],
    "paragraphs": [
      {
        "text": "62022CJ0162",
        "paragraph_id": "para_1"
      },
      {
        "text": "JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber)",
        "paragraph_id": "para_2"
      },
      {
        "text": "7 September 2023 (\n *1\n )",
        "paragraph_id": "para_3"
      },
      {
        "text": "(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Scope – Article 15(1) – Data retained by providers of electronic communications services and made available to authorities in charge of criminal proceedings – Subsequent use of those data in an investigation into misconduct in office)",
        "paragraph_id": "para_4"
      },
      {
        "text": "In Case C‑162/22,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_5"
      },
      {
        "text": "REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania), made by decision of 24 February 2022, received at the Court on 3 March 2022, in the proceedings brought by",
        "paragraph_id": "para_6"
      },
      {
        "text": "A.G.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_7"
      },
      {
        "text": "other party:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_8"
      },
      {
        "text": "Lietuvos Respublikos generalinė prokuratūra,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_9"
      },
      {
        "text": "THE COURT (First Chamber),",
        "paragraph_id": "para_10"
      },
      {
        "text": "composed of A. Arabadjiev, President of the Chamber, P.G. Xuereb (Rapporteur), T. von Danwitz, A. Kumin and I. Ziemele, Judges,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_11"
      },
      {
        "text": "Advocate General: M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_12"
      },
      {
        "text": "Registrar: A. Lamote, Administrator,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_13"
      },
      {
        "text": "having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 2 February 2023,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_14"
      },
      {
        "text": "after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_15"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_16"
      },
      {
        "text": "A.G., by G. Danėlius, advokatas,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_17"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_18"
      },
      {
        "text": "the Lithuanian Government, by S. Grigonis, V. Kazlauskaitė-Švenčionienė and V. Vasiliauskienė, acting as Agents,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_19"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_20"
      },
      {
        "text": "the Czech Government, by O. Serdula, M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_21"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_22"
      },
      {
        "text": "the Estonian Government, by M. Kriisa, acting as Agent,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_23"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_24"
      },
      {
        "text": "Ireland, by M. Browne, A. Joyce and M. Tierney, acting as Agents, and by D. Fennelly, Barrister-at-Law,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_25"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_26"
      },
      {
        "text": "the French Government, by R. Bénard, acting as Agent,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_27"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_28"
      },
      {
        "text": "the Italian Government, by G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by A. Grumetto, avvocato dello Stato,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_29"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_30"
      },
      {
        "text": "the Hungarian Government, by Zs. Biró-Tóth and M.Z. Fehér, acting as Agents,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_31"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_32"
      },
      {
        "text": "the European Commission, by S.L. Kalėda, H. Kranenborg, P.-J. Loewenthal and F. Wilman, acting as Agents,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_33"
      },
      {
        "text": "after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 30 March 2023,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_34"
      },
      {
        "text": "gives the following",
        "paragraph_id": "para_35"
      },
      {
        "text": "Judgment",
        "paragraph_id": "para_36"
      },
      {
        "text": "1",
        "paragraph_id": "para_37"
      },
      {
        "text": "This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on priv …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_38"
      },
      {
        "text": "2",
        "paragraph_id": "para_39"
      },
      {
        "text": "The request has been made in proceedings brought by A.G. concerning the legality of decisions of the Lietuvos Respublikos generalinė prokuratūra (Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Lithuania; ‘the Prosecutor General’s Office’) dismissing him from service as a public prosecutor.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_40"
      },
      {
        "text": "Legal context",
        "paragraph_id": "para_41"
      },
      {
        "text": "European Union law",
        "paragraph_id": "para_42"
      },
      {
        "text": "3",
        "paragraph_id": "para_43"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 1 of Directive 2002/58, entitled ‘Scope and aim’, provides:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_44"
      },
      {
        "text": "‘1.   This Directive provides for the harmonisation of the national provisions required to ensure an equivalent level of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, and in particular the right to privacy and confidentiality, with respect to the processing of personal data in the electronic communication sector and to ensure the free movement of such data and of electronic communication equipment and services in the Community.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_45"
      },
      {
        "text": "…",
        "paragraph_id": "para_46"
      },
      {
        "text": "3.   This Directive shall not apply to activities which fall outside the scope of the Treaty establishing the European Community, such as those covered by Titles V and VI of the Treaty on European Union, and in any case to activities concerning public security, defence, State security (including the economic well-being of the State when the activities relate to State security matters) and the activities of the State in areas of criminal law.’",
        "paragraph_id": "para_47"
      },
      {
        "text": "4",
        "paragraph_id": "para_48"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 5 of that directive, entitled ‘Confidentiality of the communications’, provides, in paragraph 1 thereof:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_49"
      },
      {
        "text": "‘Member States shall ensure the confidentiality of communications and the related traffic data by means of a public communications network and publicly available electronic communications services, through national legislation. In particular, they shall prohibit listening, tapping, storage or other …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_50"
      },
      {
        "text": "5",
        "paragraph_id": "para_51"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 15 of that directive, entitled ‘Application of certain provisions of Directive 95/46/EC’, states, in paragraph 1 thereof:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_52"
      },
      {
        "text": "‘Member States may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations provided for in Article 5, Article 6, Article 8(1), (2), (3) and (4), and Article 9 of this Directive when such restriction constitutes a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democr …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_53"
      },
      {
        "text": "Lithuanian law",
        "paragraph_id": "para_54"
      },
      {
        "text": "The Law on electronic communications",
        "paragraph_id": "para_55"
      },
      {
        "text": "6",
        "paragraph_id": "para_56"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 65(2) of the Lietuvos Respublikos elektroninių ryšių įstatymas (Law of the Republic of Lithuania on electronic communications) of 15 April 2004 (Žin., 2004, No 69-2382), in the version applicable to the facts in the main proceedings (‘the Law on electronic communications’), requires provider …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_57"
      },
      {
        "text": "7",
        "paragraph_id": "para_58"
      },
      {
        "text": "In accordance with Annex 1 to the Law on electronic communications, the categories of data to be retained are as follows:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_59"
      },
      {
        "text": "‘1. Data necessary to trace and identify the source of a communication: … 2. Data necessary to identify the destination of a communication: … 3. Data necessary to identify the date, time and duration of a communication: … 4. Data necessary to identify the type of communication: … 5. Data necessary to identify users’ communication equipment or what purports to be their equipment: … 6. Data necessary to identify the location of mobile communication equipment: …’",
        "paragraph_id": "para_60"
      },
      {
        "text": "8",
        "paragraph_id": "para_61"
      },
      {
        "text": "Under Article 77(4) of that law, where there is a reasoned court order or other legal basis established by law, providers of electronic communications services must make it technically possible, in particular for criminal intelligence bodies and pre-trial investigation bodies, in accordance with the …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_62"
      },
      {
        "text": "The Law on criminal intelligence",
        "paragraph_id": "para_63"
      },
      {
        "text": "9",
        "paragraph_id": "para_64"
      },
      {
        "text": "Point 1 of Article 6(3) of the Lietuvos Respublikos kriminalinės žvalgybos įstatymas (Law of the Republic of Lithuania on criminal intelligence) of 2 October 2012 (Žin., 2012, No 122-6093), in the version applicable to the facts in the main proceedings (‘the Law on criminal intelligence’), provides …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_65"
      },
      {
        "text": "10",
        "paragraph_id": "para_66"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 8(1) of that law provides that an investigation is to be carried out by criminal intelligence bodies where, inter alia, information comes to light concerning the preparation or commission of a very serious, serious or less serious criminal offence or concerning persons who are preparing, com …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_67"
      },
      {
        "text": "11",
        "paragraph_id": "para_68"
      },
      {
        "text": "Under point 5 of Article 19(1) of the Law on criminal intelligence, information from criminal intelligence operations may be used in the situations referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of that article and in other situations provided for by law. In accordance with paragraph 3 of that article, informati …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_69"
      },
      {
        "text": "The Code of Criminal Procedure",
        "paragraph_id": "para_70"
      },
      {
        "text": "12",
        "paragraph_id": "para_71"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that an investigator may, by decision of an investigating judge taken at the request of the public prosecutor’s office, listen to and transcribe conversations transmitted over electronic communications networks and monitor, record and store othe …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_72"
      },
      {
        "text": "13",
        "paragraph_id": "para_73"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 177(1) of that code provides that investigation data are confidential and, until the case is examined by a court, may be disclosed only with the authorisation of the public prosecutor’s office and only in so far as such disclosure is justified.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_74"
      },
      {
        "text": "14",
        "paragraph_id": "para_75"
      },
      {
        "text": "For the purpose of implementing Article 177 of that code, the Ikiteisminio tyrimo duomenų teikimo ir panaudojimo ne baudžiamojo persekiojimo tikslais ir ikiteisminio tyrimo duomenų apsaugos rekomendacijos (Recommendations on the provision and use of pre-trial investigation data for non-prosecution p …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_76"
      },
      {
        "text": "15",
        "paragraph_id": "para_77"
      },
      {
        "text": "Paragraph 23 of those recommendations provides that, upon receiving a request for access to investigation data, the public prosecutor is to decide whether such data should be provided. If the decision is taken to provide them, the public prosecutor must specify to what extent the data covered by the request may be provided.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_78"
      },
      {
        "text": "The dispute in the main proceedings and the question referred for a preliminary ruling",
        "paragraph_id": "para_79"
      },
      {
        "text": "16",
        "paragraph_id": "para_80"
      },
      {
        "text": "The Prosecutor General’s Office opened an internal investigation into the appellant in the main proceedings, who at the time was a public prosecutor in a Lithuanian public prosecutor’s office, on the ground that there was reason to believe that he had, when leading a pre-trial investigation, unlawfully provided information pertaining to that pre-trial investigation to the suspect and his lawyer.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_81"
      },
      {
        "text": "17",
        "paragraph_id": "para_82"
      },
      {
        "text": "In its report on that investigation, the Prosecutor General’s Office found that the appellant in the main proceedings had in fact engaged in misconduct in office.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_83"
      },
      {
        "text": "18",
        "paragraph_id": "para_84"
      },
      {
        "text": "According to that report, that misconduct in office was demonstrated by the evidence obtained during the internal investigation. In particular, information obtained during criminal intelligence operations and data collected during two pre-trial investigations confirmed telephone communications betwe …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_85"
      },
      {
        "text": "19",
        "paragraph_id": "para_86"
      },
      {
        "text": "On the basis of that report, the Prosecutor General’s Office adopted two orders by which it, first, imposed the penalty of dismissal from service on the appellant in the main proceedings and, second, dismissed him from service.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_87"
      },
      {
        "text": "20",
        "paragraph_id": "para_88"
      },
      {
        "text": "The appellant in the main proceedings brought an action before the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas (Regional Administrative Court, Vilnius, Lithuania), requesting, inter alia, that those two orders be set aside.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_89"
      },
      {
        "text": "21",
        "paragraph_id": "para_90"
      },
      {
        "text": "By judgment of 16 July 2021, that court dismissed the action brought by the appellant in the main proceedings, on the ground, inter alia, that the criminal intelligence operations carried out in the present case were lawful and that the information gathered in accordance with the provisions of the Law on criminal intelligence had been used lawfully to assess whether the appellant in the main proceedings had engaged in misconduct in office.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_91"
      },
      {
        "text": "22",
        "paragraph_id": "para_92"
      },
      {
        "text": "The appellant in the main proceedings brought an appeal before the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania), the referring court, claiming that access by the intelligence bodies, in connection with a criminal intelligence operation, to traffic data an …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_93"
      },
      {
        "text": "23",
        "paragraph_id": "para_94"
      },
      {
        "text": "According to the referring court, the issues raised by the appellant in the main proceedings involve two elements: (i) access to data retained by providers of electronic communications services for purposes other than combating serious crime and preventing serious threats to public security; and (ii) once such access has been obtained, the use of those data in investigating corruption-related misconduct in office.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_95"
      },
      {
        "text": "24",
        "paragraph_id": "para_96"
      },
      {
        "text": "The referring court recalls that it is apparent from the Court’s case-law, in particular the judgment of 6 October 2020, Privacy International ( C‑623/17 , EU:C:2020:790 , paragraph  39 ), that Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in conjunction with Article 3 thereof, must be interpreted as mea …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_97"
      },
      {
        "text": "25",
        "paragraph_id": "para_98"
      },
      {
        "text": "However, the Court has not yet ruled on the impact of the subsequent use of the data concerned on the interference with fundamental rights. In those circumstances, the referring court harbours doubts as to whether such subsequent use must also be regarded as constituting such a serious interference …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_99"
      },
      {
        "text": "26",
        "paragraph_id": "para_100"
      },
      {
        "text": "In those circumstances, the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania) decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_101"
      },
      {
        "text": "‘Must Article 15(1) of [Directive 2002/58], read in conjunction with Articles 7, 8, 11 and 52(1) of the [Charter], be interpreted as prohibiting the competent public authorities from using data retained by providers of electronic communications services which may provide information on the data of, …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_102"
      },
      {
        "text": "Consideration of the question referred",
        "paragraph_id": "para_103"
      },
      {
        "text": "27",
        "paragraph_id": "para_104"
      },
      {
        "text": "By its question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in the light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter, must be interpreted as precluding the use, in connection with investigations into corruption-related misconduct in office, of …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_105"
      },
      {
        "text": "28",
        "paragraph_id": "para_106"
      },
      {
        "text": "As a preliminary point, it is apparent from the order for reference that, although the administrative file relating to the proceedings that gave rise to the orders at issue in the main proceedings, referred to in paragraph 19 above, also included information that had been gathered by the competent a …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_107"
      },
      {
        "text": "29",
        "paragraph_id": "para_108"
      },
      {
        "text": "In that regard, it follows from the information in the request for a preliminary ruling that the data to which the question referred relates are the data retained pursuant to Article 65(2) of the Law on electronic communications, read in conjunction with Annex 1 to that law, which imposes on provide …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_109"
      },
      {
        "text": "30",
        "paragraph_id": "para_110"
      },
      {
        "text": "As regards the conditions under which those data may be used during an internal procedure concerning corruption-related misconduct in office, it must first of all be recalled that access to those data may be granted, pursuant to a measure adopted under Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, only in so …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_111"
      },
      {
        "text": "31",
        "paragraph_id": "para_112"
      },
      {
        "text": "In that regard, the Court has already held that Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in the light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter, precludes legislative measures which provide, on a preventative basis, for the purposes of combating serious crime and preventing serious th …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_113"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_114"
      },
      {
        "text": "the targeted retention of traffic and location data which is limited, on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory factors, according to the categories of persons concerned or using a geographical criterion, for a period that is limited in time to what is strictly necessary, but which may be extended;",
        "paragraph_id": "para_115"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_116"
      },
      {
        "text": "the general and indiscriminate retention of IP addresses assigned to the source of an internet connection for a period that is limited in time to what is strictly necessary;",
        "paragraph_id": "para_117"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_118"
      },
      {
        "text": "the general and indiscriminate retention of data relating to the civil identity of users of electronic communications systems; and",
        "paragraph_id": "para_119"
      },
      {
        "text": "–",
        "paragraph_id": "para_120"
      },
      {
        "text": "recourse to an instruction requiring providers of electronic communications services, by means of a decision of the competent authority that is subject to effective judicial review, to undertake, for a specified period of time, the expedited retention of traffic and location data in the possession of those service providers,",
        "paragraph_id": "para_121"
      },
      {
        "text": "provided that those measures ensure, by means of clear and precise rules, that the retention of data at issue is subject to compliance with the applicable substantive and procedural conditions and that the persons concerned have effective safeguards against the risks of abuse (judgment of 20 September 2022, SpaceNet and Telekom Deutschland, C‑793/19 and C‑794/19 , EU:C:2022:702 , paragraph  75 and the case-law cited).",
        "paragraph_id": "para_122"
      },
      {
        "text": "32",
        "paragraph_id": "para_123"
      },
      {
        "text": "As regards the objectives capable of justifying the use, by public authorities, of data retained by providers of electronic communications services pursuant to a measure in accordance with those provisions, it must be recalled that Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 enables the Member States to intr …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_124"
      },
      {
        "text": "33",
        "paragraph_id": "para_125"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 cannot permit the exception to the obligation of principle to ensure the confidentiality of electronic communications and data relating thereto and, in particular, to the prohibition on storage of those data, laid down in Article 5 of that directive, to become the …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_126"
      },
      {
        "text": "34",
        "paragraph_id": "para_127"
      },
      {
        "text": "As regards the objectives that are capable of justifying a limitation of the rights and obligations laid down, in particular, in Articles 5, 6 and 9 of Directive 2002/58, the Court has previously held that the list of objectives set out in the first sentence of Article 15(1) of that directive is exh …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_128"
      },
      {
        "text": "35",
        "paragraph_id": "para_129"
      },
      {
        "text": "As regards the public interest objectives that may justify a measure taken pursuant to Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, it is clear from the Court’s case-law that, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, there is a hierarchy amongst those objectives according to their respective impo …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_130"
      },
      {
        "text": "36",
        "paragraph_id": "para_131"
      },
      {
        "text": "In that regard, the importance of the objective of safeguarding national security, read in the light of Article 4(2) TEU, according to which national security remains the sole responsibility of each Member State, exceeds that of the other objectives referred to in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_132"
      },
      {
        "text": "37",
        "paragraph_id": "para_133"
      },
      {
        "text": "As regards the objective of preventing, investigating, detecting and prosecuting criminal offences, the Court held that, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, only action to combat serious crime and measures to prevent serious threats to public security are capable of justifying serio …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_134"
      },
      {
        "text": "38",
        "paragraph_id": "para_135"
      },
      {
        "text": "It follows from that case-law that, although the fight against serious crime and the prevention of serious threats to public security are of lesser importance in the hierarchy of objectives of public interest than the safeguarding of national security (see, to that effect, judgment of 5 April 2022, …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_136"
      },
      {
        "text": "39",
        "paragraph_id": "para_137"
      },
      {
        "text": "In that context, it must nevertheless be recalled that, as is also apparent from paragraph 31 above, the question whether the Member States may justify a limitation on the rights and obligations laid down, inter alia, in Articles 5, 6 and 9 of Directive 2002/58 must be assessed by measuring the seri …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_138"
      },
      {
        "text": "40",
        "paragraph_id": "para_139"
      },
      {
        "text": "Moreover, the Court has already held that access to traffic and location data retained by providers in accordance with a measure taken under Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, which must be given effect in full compliance with the conditions resulting from the case-law interpreting that directive, …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_140"
      },
      {
        "text": "41",
        "paragraph_id": "para_141"
      },
      {
        "text": "Those considerations apply mutatis mutandis to the subsequent use of traffic and location data retained by providers of electronic communications services pursuant to a measure adopted under Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 for the purpose of combating serious crime. Once they have been retained a …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_142"
      },
      {
        "text": "42",
        "paragraph_id": "para_143"
      },
      {
        "text": "As regards the argument raised by the Czech Government and by Ireland in their written observations that disciplinary proceedings concerning corruption-related misconduct in office could be connected with the safeguarding of public security, it is sufficient to note that, in its order for reference, the referring court has not indicated any serious threat to public security.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_144"
      },
      {
        "text": "43",
        "paragraph_id": "para_145"
      },
      {
        "text": "Furthermore, while it is true that internal investigations into disciplinary misconduct or misconduct in office related to acts of corruption may play an important role in the fight against such acts, a legislative measure providing for such investigations does not correspond, genuinely and strictly …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_146"
      },
      {
        "text": "44",
        "paragraph_id": "para_147"
      },
      {
        "text": "In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the question referred is that Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in the light of Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter, must be interpreted as precluding the use, in connection with investigations into corruption-related misconduct i …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_148"
      },
      {
        "text": "Costs",
        "paragraph_id": "para_149"
      },
      {
        "text": "45",
        "paragraph_id": "para_150"
      },
      {
        "text": "Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the referring court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. Costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs of those parties, are not recoverable.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_151"
      },
      {
        "text": "On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules:",
        "paragraph_id": "para_152"
      },
      {
        "text": "Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), as amended by Directive 2009/136/ …",
        "paragraph_id": "para_153"
      },
      {
        "text": "must be interpreted as precluding the use, in connection with investigations into corruption-related misconduct in office, of personal data relating to electronic communications which have been retained, pursuant to a legislative measure adopted under that provision, by providers of electronic communications services and which have subsequently been made available, pursuant to that measure, to the competent authorities for the purpose of combating serious crime.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_154"
      },
      {
        "text": "[Signatures]",
        "paragraph_id": "para_155"
      },
      {
        "text": "(\n *1\n ) Language of the case: Lithuanian.",
        "paragraph_id": "para_156"
      }
    ],
    "word_count": 5148,
    "cites": [
      "C-623/17",
      "C-746/18",
      "C-793/19",
      "C-794/19",
      "C-511/18",
      "C-512/18",
      "C-520/18",
      "C-140/20"
    ],
    "cited_by": [],
    "sha256": "0ef1b92258f88394032e98f93c84ec06ac98b2b06b77e44392291ebf2d84c4fc",
    "source_url": "https://publications.europa.eu/resource/celex/62022CJ0162.ENG.xhtml.ECR_62022CJ0162_EN_01.html",
    "fetched_at": "2026-09-30T17:36:42.462+00:00",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/ai/judgments/eu/c-162-22",
    "risk_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu:c-162-22",
    "relations_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu:c-162-22",
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/changes",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/agent?id=eu:c-162-22"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:9ce719b89e3558bcaa8eeb41daafb3d78924869302fefa3fb358735cd734d635",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-23",
  "expires": "2026-10-24T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-23+legal-2026-10-23+2026-10-23T14:34:08",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9ce719b89e3558bcaa8eeb41daafb3d78924869302fefa3fb358735cd734d635",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-23T21:33:30.883Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-162-22",
  "follow": [
    {
      "rel": "risk",
      "href": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu:c-162-22"
    },
    {
      "rel": "relations",
      "href": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu:c-162-22"
    },
    {
      "rel": "agent",
      "href": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/eu-praxis/agent?id=eu:c-162-22"
    },
    {
      "rel": "obligations",
      "href": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obligation-chain"
    },
    {
      "rel": "changes",
      "href": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu"
    }
  ],
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "_sweep_notice": {
    "mode": "citation",
    "reason": "corpus sweep without measurable return",
    "vendor": "Anthropic",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text",
    "full_text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise",
    "attribution": "cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"
  },
  "access_class": "public",
  "access_view": "public"
}