{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-26",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:ed55cc",
    "proof": "sha256:46297cf05f41813e0df055bd750bda426ec9c8eaf03fa7fe1372c95361326ef7",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "precedent",
  "object_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/precedent",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-557-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "edge": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-557-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-557-24-p",
    "issue": "Appeal – Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Decisions taken by the European Central Bank (ECB) concerning Banca Carige SpA – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Conflict of interest – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Grounds of the General Court’s judgment.",
    "court": "CJ",
    "decided": "2026-05-21",
    "binding": "binding",
    "status": "final",
    "holdings": [
      {
        "n": 1,
        "paragraph_id": "para_623",
        "text": "It is apparent from those grounds of the judgment under appeal that, contrary to what the appellants claim, the General Court did not merely recall the grounds of the own funds decision, but examined the appellants’ arguments and held that, in the light of Banca Carige’s situation, as set out in that decision, those arguments were not sufficient to establish a sufficiently serious breach of the principle of proportionality on the part of the ECB concerning the time limits fixed in that decision.",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#1"
      },
      {
        "n": 2,
        "paragraph_id": "para_625",
        "text": "It should also be noted that the appellants have not put forward any arguments to show that, in so ruling, the General Court erred in law.",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#2"
      },
      {
        "n": 3,
        "paragraph_id": "para_627",
        "text": "Accordingly, the third part of the third ground of appeal must be rejected as unfounded.",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#3"
      },
      {
        "n": 4,
        "paragraph_id": "para_631",
        "text": "The appellants dispute the grounds set out by the General Court in paragraphs 78 to 86 of the judgment under appeal to justify the rejection of the arguments relating to the second instance of unlawful conduct alleged against the ECB, alleging that the ECB had infringed EU rules so far as concerns its relationship with the bank’s board of directors. They complain, in essence, that the General Court confined itself to examining the second instance of unlawful conduct in the light of Articles 4 and 16 of Regulation No 1024/2013, which, in their view, amounts to a distortion of their line of argument. Thus, the General Court relied on a misconception of the ECB’s powers by holding that the ECB could perform any act not expressly and specifically prohibited by EU law. Such a consideration is contrary to the ‘fundamental principle of conferral’, as enshrined in several provisions of the EU and FEU Treaties.",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#4"
      },
      {
        "n": 5,
        "paragraph_id": "para_633",
        "text": "The appellants add that the alleged conduct of the ECB was contrary to Articles 3 and 17 of the Charter. In addition, the grounds set out in paragraphs 82 to 85 of the judgment under appeal concern the early intervention measure, and not the ECB’s interference with Banca Carige’s governance, which is the subject of the appellants’ arguments referred to by the General Court as the ‘second instance of unlawful conduct’.",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#5"
      },
      {
        "n": 6,
        "paragraph_id": "para_635",
        "text": "Last, in their reply, the appellants observe that, on 18 December 2024, Mr P.F., the former managing director of Banca Carige, was convicted in proceedings before the Tribunale penale di Milano (Criminal Court, Milan, Italy).",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#6"
      },
      {
        "n": 7,
        "paragraph_id": "para_637",
        "text": "The ECB and the Commission contend that the fourth ground must be rejected.",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#7"
      },
      {
        "n": 8,
        "paragraph_id": "para_640",
        "text": "In paragraph 76 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court noted that, in the context of what it referred to as the ‘second instance of unlawful conduct’ alleged against the ECB, the appellants claimed that the ECB had infringed, in a sufficiently serious manner, Articles 4 and 16 of Regulation No 1024/2013, first, in that the ECB had conferred with Mr Modiano and Mr Innocenzi with a view to their resigning from Banca Carige’s board of directors, with effect as from 2 January 2019, causing the bank’s board of directors to be disqualified and thus paving the way for that institution to be placed under temporary administration; second, in that the ECB had sought to limit the powers of that board of directors to a simple power to ratify the decisions taken by the managing director, at the meeting of 16 February 2018 and during successive exchanges between Mr Malacalza, Ms Nouy, Chair of the ECB’s Supervisory Board, and Mr Quintana, member of the ECB’s Directorate-General for Micro-Prudential Supervision; and, third, in that the ECB had concealed from the board of directors for several months the extent of the difficulty faced by Banca Carige in terms of capital, and by informing it only on 21 June 2018 of the content of a letter which the ECB had sent on 4 June 2018 to Banca Carige’s managing director.",
        "kind": "operative_part",
        "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-557-24-p#8"
      }
    ],
    "text_sha256": "5733896e24b89a42b4c4e6b70328336d52d35b429f052f37f6e441db39d2bf3e",
    "method": "Domslutet efter 'On those grounds' i domens egen text.",
    "limits": [],
    "hash": "6b4231c6e5bdf41e32f272443979dd670d51a9ce2ba84ef3b8310dfa1e9eb5c6"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-557-24-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-557-24-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-557-24-p"
    },
    "evidence": {
      "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-557-24-p",
      "chain_verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes/verify",
      "object_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/objects/changes"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-557-24-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-557-24-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-557-24-p",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-557-24-p",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "node_state": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-557-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "6b4231c6e5bdf41e32f272443979dd670d51a9ce2ba84ef3b8310dfa1e9eb5c6",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:46297cf05f41813e0df055bd750bda426ec9c8eaf03fa7fe1372c95361326ef7",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-26",
  "expires": "2026-10-27T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-26+legal-2026-10-26+2026-10-26T21:17:09",
    "content_hash": "sha256:46297cf05f41813e0df055bd750bda426ec9c8eaf03fa7fe1372c95361326ef7",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-27T00:06:04.196Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}