{ "attribution": { "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com", "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-362-21", "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-362-21)", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision", "version": "legal-2026-10-23", "fingerprint": "ewai:se:58d623", "proof": "sha256:1dcc611853f74146f8a26f377e8ce57b92440b205bbec5f2379a88c0c8b660a6", "jurisdiction": "se", "lang": "en" }, "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "object_type": "precedent", "object_id": "precedent:eu:c-362-21", "schema_version": "1", "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/precedent", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-362-21", "judgment": { "id": "eu:c-362-21", "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-362-21" }, "siblings": { "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-362-21", "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-362-21", "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-362-21", "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-362-21", "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-362-21", "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-362-21", "edge": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-362-21", "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-362-21", "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-362-21", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-362-21", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-362-21", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-362-21" }, "source": "NovaCopilot", "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-362-21", "item": { "judgment": "eu:c-362-21", "issue": "Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Article 25(1) – Article 26 – Annex I – Legal effects of electronic signatures – Requirements relating to an advanced electronic signature – Administrative act issued in the form of an electronic document signed with an electronic signature not meeting the requirements for a ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Cumulative requirements – Consequences – Article 3(15) – Absence of a ‘qualified certificate for electronic signature’ – Entry of a qualified electronic signature in the certificate issued by the trust service provider – Effect – Names of the holder of the electronic signature which have been transliterated using Latin script rather than being written in Cyrillic script as they normally are.", "court": "CJ", "decided": "2022-10-20", "binding": "binding", "status": "final", "holdings": [ { "n": 1, "paragraph_id": "para_230", "text": "Article 25(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC must be interpreted as meaning that it is permissible for an administrative act issued in the form of an electronic document to be declared invalid where it is signed with an electronic signature which does not meet the requirements of that regulation for it to be regarded as a ‘qualified electronic signature’, within the meaning of Article 3(12) of that regulation, provided that the act is not declared invalid solely on the ground that the signature is in electronic form.", "kind": "operative_part", "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-362-21#1" }, { "n": 2, "paragraph_id": "para_232", "text": "Article 3(12) of Regulation No 910/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that the absence of a ‘qualified certificate for electronic signature’, within the meaning of Article 3(15) of that regulation, is sufficient to establish that an electronic signature does not constitute a ‘qualified electronic signature’ within the meaning of Article 3(12), since it is irrelevant in that regard whether or not the signature in question is classified as a ‘professional electronic signature’.", "kind": "operative_part", "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-362-21#2" }, { "n": 3, "paragraph_id": "para_234", "text": "Regulation No 910/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that the entry of an electronic signature in the certificate issued by the trust service provider is not sufficient for that signature to meet the requirements laid down by that regulation for it to be regarded as a ‘qualified electronic signature’ within the meaning of Article 3(12) of that regulation. When such a classification is challenged in the context of legal proceedings, the national court is required to ascertain whether the cumulative conditions laid down in Article 3(12) are all met, which means that it must, in particular, ascertain whether the conditions referred to in Article 26 of and Annex I to that regulation are met.", "kind": "operative_part", "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-362-21#3" }, { "n": 4, "paragraph_id": "para_236", "text": "Article 3(12) of, and Annex I to, Regulation No 910/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that, when verifying the compliance of the qualified electronic signature with the requirements of that annex, the fact that the names of the signatory, who normally uses Cyrillic script for those names, have been transliterated using Latin script does not preclude his or her electronic signature from being regarded as a ‘qualified electronic signature’, within the meaning of Article 3(12), provided that the electronic signature in question is uniquely linked to the signatory and that it is capable of identifying him or her, which is a matter for the national court to establish.", "kind": "operative_part", "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-362-21#4" } ], "text_sha256": "b6c51cf1700b9592e831c83db8567a5acf0ac62a2902a3a5518178def8c85398", "method": "Domslutet efter 'On those grounds' i domens egen text.", "limits": [], "hash": "310005d839d3b2d55763694199849c900832ecc3987d44593de7b1f2140291b4" }, "links": { "provisions": null, "case_law": { "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-362-21", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-362-21", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-362-21", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-362-21" }, "evidence": { "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-362-21", "chain_verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes/verify", "object_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/objects/changes" }, "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-362-21?view=compact", "representations": { "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-362-21", "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-362-21" }, "machine_languages": [ "en", "sv" ], "ref": "eu:c-362-21" }, "watch": { "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes", "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu", "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.", "recheck_after_seconds": 86400 }, "metadata": { "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1", "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-362-21", "source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "official_source": null, "short_answer": null, "short_answer_status": "not_in_register", "hash": "310005d839d3b2d55763694199849c900832ecc3987d44593de7b1f2140291b4", "schema_version": "1", "last_verified_at": null, "verification_status": "not_verified_yet", "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only" }, "hash": "sha256:1dcc611853f74146f8a26f377e8ce57b92440b205bbec5f2379a88c0c8b660a6", "version": "legal-2026-10-23", "expires": "2026-10-25T00:00:00.000Z", "dependency": { "index_version": "legal-2026-10-23+legal-2026-10-23+2026-10-23T14:34:08", "content_hash": "sha256:1dcc611853f74146f8a26f377e8ce57b92440b205bbec5f2379a88c0c8b660a6", "revalidate_after": "2026-10-24T01:59:31.074Z", "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600, "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred", "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency", "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify", "stale_copy_invalid": true }, "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-362-21", "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.", "content_notice": { "legal_advice": false, "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.", "kinds": { "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted", "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text", "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer" }, "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.", "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections", "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration" }, "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering" }