{ "attribution": { "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com", "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-293-24", "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-293-24)", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision", "version": "legal-2026-10-04", "fingerprint": "ewai:se:f3d54b", "proof": "sha256:ec9838a61abd14c48806959f5ed7a7221a2a5b85a13f9e6440c83f06d00bfbe0", "jurisdiction": "se", "lang": "en" }, "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "brand": { "product": "NovaCopilot", "platform": "ExploreWorldAI", "infrastructure": "ExploreWorld Legal", "infrastructure_url": "legal.exploreworldai.com", "legal_entity": "Valkiv Ventures AB", "permanent_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/novacopilot", "source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "powered_by": "Powered by NovaCopilot", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/licensvillkor", "contact": "stig@valkiv.com" }, "object_type": "precedent", "object_id": "precedent:eu:c-293-24", "schema_version": "1", "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/precedent", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-293-24", "judgment": { "id": "eu:c-293-24", "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-293-24" }, "siblings": { "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-293-24", "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-293-24", "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-293-24", "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-293-24", "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-293-24", "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-293-24", "edge": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-293-24", "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-293-24", "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-293-24", "obligation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/obligation/eu:c-293-24", "sanction": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/sanction/eu:c-293-24", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-293-24" }, "source": "NovaCopilot", "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-293-24", "item": { "judgment": "eu:c-293-24", "issue": "Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directives 77/187/EEC and 2001/23/EC – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Article 1(1) and Article 3(1) – Obligation to make a request for a preliminary ruling under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU – Member State liability for harm caused to individuals by breaches of EU law attributable to that Member State – Breaches attributable to a national court or tribunal against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law – Taking into consideration the case-law of the Court extant at the time of delivery of the decision of that national court or tribunal which allegedly caused that harm.", "court": "CJ", "decided": "2026-09-08", "binding": "binding", "status": "final", "holdings": [ { "n": 1, "paragraph_id": "para_175", "text": "1. The following circumstances contribute to establishing that, in its judgment of 25 February 2009, the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Supreme Court, Portugal) committed a sufficiently serious breach of Article 1(1) of Council Directive 77/187/EEC of 14 February 1977 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of businesses: first, the fact that that judgment is vitiated by a combination of errors of interpretation of EU law, assessed in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice which that court could reasonably be expected to take into account when it adopted that judgment; second, the fact that the judgment of 25 February 2009 was handed down in disregard of the obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling which was incumbent on that court pursuant to the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU; and, third, the fact that the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Supreme Court) could not be unaware that the conformity with EU law of the methodological approach taken in that judgment was the specific subject of a request for a preliminary ruling pending before the Court of Justice.", "kind": "operative_part", "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-293-24#1" }, { "n": 2, "paragraph_id": "para_176", "text": "2. Article 3(1) of Directive 77/187 and Article 3(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses,", "kind": "operative_part", "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-293-24#2" }, { "n": 3, "paragraph_id": "para_177", "text": "must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that the receipt, by an employee, of the statutory compensation due following a collective redundancy equates to acceptance, on the part of that employee, of his or her dismissal, with the result that he or she loses the possibility of challenging that dismissal and demanding that his or her rights be safeguarded under those directives.", "kind": "operative_part", "precedent_id": "precedent:eu:c-293-24#3" } ], "text_sha256": "a459b34dadbd0812bb48e60a7ae4b8a3a6e183d2f2add87ec08bc112b42975ef", "method": "Domslutet efter 'On those grounds' i domens egen text.", "limits": [], "hash": "d5af7ed8931124375f8e413160f4dfdf7918f9a61a0888b26feb9437468634e3" }, "watch": { "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes", "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu", "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.", "recheck_after_seconds": 86400 }, "hash": "sha256:ec9838a61abd14c48806959f5ed7a7221a2a5b85a13f9e6440c83f06d00bfbe0", "version": "legal-2026-10-04", "expires": "2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z", "dependency": { "index_version": "legal-2026-10-04+legal-2026-10-04+2026-10-04T06:21:19", "content_hash": "sha256:ec9838a61abd14c48806959f5ed7a7221a2a5b85a13f9e6440c83f06d00bfbe0", "revalidate_after": "2026-10-04T07:56:59.821Z", "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600, "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred", "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency", "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify", "stale_copy_invalid": true }, "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-293-24", "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.", "content_notice": { "legal_advice": false, "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.", "kinds": { "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted", "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text", "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer" }, "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.", "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections", "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration" }, "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering" }