{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-11-02","fingerprint":"ewai:se:055e5a","proof":"sha256:6e4759b5ddbe21b2be38664ab460d80c3ec6abe5d8540e198f5f987d046e51f1","jurisdiction":"se","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","object_type":"edge","object_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24","schema_version":"1","schema":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24","judgment":{"id":"eu:c-837-24","text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-837-24"},"siblings":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-837-24","relation":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-837-24","change":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-837-24","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-837-24","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-837-24","status":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-837-24","precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-837-24","element":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-837-24","decision":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-837-24","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-837-24","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-837-24","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-837-24"},"source":"NovaCopilot","precedent_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-837-24","item":{"judgment":"eu:c-837-24","outgoing":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~distinguishes~c-487-09","type":"distinguishes","label_sv":"särskiljer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-487/09","id":"eu:c-487-09","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-487-09"},"paragraph_ids":["para_117","para_119"],"excerpt":"On that point, the present case therefore differs from the case which gave rise to the order of 6 October 2010, INMOGOLF (C-487/09, EU:C:2010:586), to which the Commission refers.","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"8fa154eddfa4965c01134a62421e42a8b63dc992108a292bf630987d97030cde"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-197-94","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-197/94","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_102"],"excerpt":"34 The nature of a tax, duty or charge must be determined by the Court, under EU law, according to the objective characteristics by which it is levied, irrespective of its classification under national law (see, to that effect, judgments of 13 February 1996, Bautiaa and Société française maritime , ","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"530d6808a8b984f291b88d9603bbb3202e19d35687c9d5ffc70dd74d2dd4c241"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-236-97","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-236/97","id":"eu:c-236-97","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-236-97"},"paragraph_ids":["para_117"],"excerpt":"47 In that regard, it follows from the case-law of the Court that that provision allows the imposition of a tax on the transfer of securities such as shares, independently of the question of whether the company issuing those shares is listed on a stock exchange and of whether those shares are transf","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"8730205d17136dbe7f1a3b59934e75f855df19f96f7ed9e1be47e514b83e4bbd"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-252-94","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-252/94","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_102"],"excerpt":"34 The nature of a tax, duty or charge must be determined by the Court, under EU law, according to the objective characteristics by which it is levied, irrespective of its classification under national law (see, to that effect, judgments of 13 February 1996, Bautiaa and Société française maritime , ","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"6aad5193f68a6209097e455c843369d8f65954e06f2ba1425b58749512baa3aa"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-257-20","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-257/20","id":"eu:c-257-20-62020cj0257","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-257-20-62020cj0257"},"paragraph_ids":["para_92","para_101"],"excerpt":"33 That said, Article 5 of Directive 2008/7 does not require Member States to exempt the transactions referred to in Article 5(1) from all forms of direct tax (see, to that effect, judgment of 24 February 2022, Viva Telecom Bulgaria , C-257/20, EU:C:2022:125, paragraph 71).","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"cbfe6b5065298ccc46b508e9a19ae501e6c4d05b1bb976ebad05485ea008e7ac"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-264-04","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-264/04","id":"eu:c-264-04","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-264-04"},"paragraph_ids":["para_124"],"excerpt":"53 As regards Article 6(1)(b) of Directive 2008/7, it follows from the case-law of the Court that that provision permits the levying of duties in connection with the transfer of the right of ownership over immovable property or businesses, by reference to general and objective criteria (see, to that","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"c80d2bcafb042612eac269363a92f4254f4b9bad52d50e03983ee2cc49e71cd9"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-287-94","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-287/94","id":"eu:c-287-94","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-287-94"},"paragraph_ids":["para_101"],"excerpt":"In particular, the Court has already held that the harmonisation provided for by that directive does not concern direct taxes which, like corporation tax, are in principle a matter for the Member States, in compliance with EU law (see, to that effect, judgments of 26 September 1996, Frederiksen , C-","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"856d498951f2cf39c90bed0d2f979607ed6e881e9d85115706055980d4f67540"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-299-13","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-299/13","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_113"],"excerpt":"44 In so far as Article 6 of Directive 2008/7 is an exception to the prohibition in principle laid down in Article 5 of that directive, the provisions of Article 6 must be interpreted strictly (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 July 2004, Commission v Belgium , C-415/02, EU:C:2004:450, paragraph ","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"6f42dc7e868b2c222b62d2fe5473c933c93162071b5403ddfbe2f377d2532058"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-31-97","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-31/97","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_109"],"excerpt":"41 Second, as regards the German Government’s argument that the basis of assessment for IMT corresponds, in the present case, not to the value of the shares contributed, but to the reference value of the relevant properties for tax purposes, it should be noted that the prohibition on tax laid down i","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"ca7a2af87403aea688a558b6ec36b07e682fa476eacd4469b77c9613e7b2333b"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-32-97","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-32/97","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_109"],"excerpt":"41 Second, as regards the German Government’s argument that the basis of assessment for IMT corresponds, in the present case, not to the value of the shares contributed, but to the reference value of the relevant properties for tax purposes, it should be noted that the prohibition on tax laid down i","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"755f937525113aa3f95663ed9e5396e988b9e5264d99aeec24c965aa9eb4bb1b"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-347-96","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-347/96","id":"eu:c-347-96","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-347-96"},"paragraph_ids":["para_109"],"excerpt":"41 Second, as regards the German Government’s argument that the basis of assessment for IMT corresponds, in the present case, not to the value of the shares contributed, but to the reference value of the relevant properties for tax purposes, it should be noted that the prohibition on tax laid down i","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"9a2a5459074f134ab0f31179893193df89d6c760a26c483b1cb2c0f002f08bcb"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-357-13","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-357/13","id":"eu:c-357-13-62013co0357","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-357-13-62013co0357"},"paragraph_ids":["para_93","para_94"],"excerpt":"26 Full realisation of that objective presupposes that the raising of capital is burdened by indirect taxes only on the strict conditions laid down by the EU legislature (see, to that effect, judgment of 22 April 2015, Drukarnia Multipress , C-357/13, EU:C:2015:253, paragraph 32).","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"6029c501739be354f2d70d7002afdda9972d9697d4480572d6982d280a3b17d4"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-397-07","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-397/07","id":"eu:c-397-07","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-397-07"},"paragraph_ids":["para_136","para_137"],"excerpt":"65 However, Member States cannot rely, in that context, on general presumptions (see, to that effect, judgment of 9 July 2009, Commission v Spain , C-397/07, EU:C:2009:436, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"484240479af14a7e7e9ff9ec9da763e255ac40085c21cda1e2b2d7f88dc4ef53"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-415-02","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-415/02","id":"eu:c-415-02","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-415-02"},"paragraph_ids":["para_113","para_118"],"excerpt":"44 In so far as Article 6 of Directive 2008/7 is an exception to the prohibition in principle laid down in Article 5 of that directive, the provisions of Article 6 must be interpreted strictly (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 July 2004, Commission v Belgium , C-415/02, EU:C:2004:450, paragraph ","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"1ba6ea7d4b963677d52f0c4cff9e1b3ed8310874f885cf2935498aaec3601f6f"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-426-98","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-426/98","id":"eu:c-426-98","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-426-98"},"paragraph_ids":["para_102"],"excerpt":"34 The nature of a tax, duty or charge must be determined by the Court, under EU law, according to the objective characteristics by which it is levied, irrespective of its classification under national law (see, to that effect, judgments of 13 February 1996, Bautiaa and Société française maritime , ","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"b1219c823b5db478fb66089a0a73d451a1daede3c71ea06d9f4d15daa40b3dc7"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-46-04","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-46/04","id":"eu:c-46-04","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-46-04"},"paragraph_ids":["para_102"],"excerpt":"34 The nature of a tax, duty or charge must be determined by the Court, under EU law, according to the objective characteristics by which it is levied, irrespective of its classification under national law (see, to that effect, judgments of 13 February 1996, Bautiaa and Société française maritime , ","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"cbf876c3bfba742be15d1c6ba49842bbb1c8ffae4fb3bc88634612c6e511a8e1"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-466-03","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-466/03","id":"eu:c-466-03","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-466-03"},"paragraph_ids":["para_100"],"excerpt":"32 As regards the interpretation of that concept of ‘indirect tax’, it is settled case-law that, having regard to the objective pursued by Directive 2008/7, recalled in paragraph 25 of the present judgment, Article 5 of that directive must be interpreted broadly so as to ensure that that prohibition","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"0014364cb0c132e36c92f650f08337e55fc82cab3575438c84b70d9fe634f4a3"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-504-16","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-504/16","id":"eu:c-504-16","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-504-16"},"paragraph_ids":["para_139"],"excerpt":"67 Therefore, as regards transactions covered by Article 5 of Directive 2008/7, the application of a provision such as Article 2(2)(d) of the IMT Code goes beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective of combating tax evasion and avoidance and is therefore not consistent with the principle of p","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"a87b93b843bbbeebe1a5adb77967472674d97fecef4d1d156f0c1bb6bd891cee"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-56-98","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-56/98","id":"eu:c-56-98","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-56-98"},"paragraph_ids":["para_109"],"excerpt":"41 Second, as regards the German Government’s argument that the basis of assessment for IMT corresponds, in the present case, not to the value of the shares contributed, but to the reference value of the relevant properties for tax purposes, it should be noted that the prohibition on tax laid down i","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"3cb77a96efae02ae88a7a83a53ebf8115fe9140223cf813491ea8ad74c679379"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-569-07","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-569/07","id":"eu:c-569-07","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-569-07"},"paragraph_ids":["para_118"],"excerpt":"48 However, since Article 6(1)(a) of Directive 2008/7 is a derogating provision, it is intended to be applied only to transfers of securities forming an independent transaction, and not to transfers of securities forming an incidental transaction, integral to a transaction covered by Article 5 of th","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"186c615e55353222654b5309104a582755af4b0b563f37be13e49cb94472d108"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-573-16","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-573/16","id":"eu:c-573-16","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-573-16"},"paragraph_ids":["para_100","para_118"],"excerpt":"32 As regards the interpretation of that concept of ‘indirect tax’, it is settled case-law that, having regard to the objective pursued by Directive 2008/7, recalled in paragraph 25 of the present judgment, Article 5 of that directive must be interpreted broadly so as to ensure that that prohibition","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"6307143a14e86a8a3774598de8c53b36e5ee4608a8282e6fe802cb0bb8684d9b"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-613-16","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-613/16","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_139"],"excerpt":"67 Therefore, as regards transactions covered by Article 5 of Directive 2008/7, the application of a provision such as Article 2(2)(d) of the IMT Code goes beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective of combating tax evasion and avoidance and is therefore not consistent with the principle of p","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"34e055038439282f4ac1c298144694747306bc849298f57f898cfde205d8ee47"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-685-23","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-685/23","id":"eu:c-685-23-62023cj0685","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-685-23-62023cj0685"},"paragraph_ids":["para_100"],"excerpt":"32 As regards the interpretation of that concept of ‘indirect tax’, it is settled case-law that, having regard to the objective pursued by Directive 2008/7, recalled in paragraph 25 of the present judgment, Article 5 of that directive must be interpreted broadly so as to ensure that that prohibition","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"aa610465af5a6e8b1b27e943e0b727474be0cafd365ea3f0cc906f86159bd5b9"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~follows~c-744-23","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-744/23","id":"eu:c-744-23","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-744-23"},"paragraph_ids":["para_89"],"excerpt":"In that regard, it is for the Court to extract from all the information provided by the national court, in particular from the grounds of the order for reference, the points of EU law which require interpretation, having regard to the subject matter of the dispute (see, to that effect, judgments of ","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"4fb9529ac22a14c5442fb48b924b84533698c160f0344c2d7f40d220578b62ab"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~cites~c-135-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-135/24","id":"eu:c-135-24","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-135-24"},"paragraph_ids":["para_140"],"excerpt":"68 Furthermore, and in any event, the Portuguese Government has not claimed that the transaction at issue in the main proceedings was a fraudulent or abusive practice, and, moreover, there is nothing in the documents before the Court to suggest that that was the case (see, by analogy, judgment of 13","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"4bc2338499c334feea3876686c1eab5a34a6e0d161e8d52ac1cfa78c2c7d2d01"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~cites~c-193-04","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-193/04","id":"eu:c-193-04","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-193-04"},"paragraph_ids":["para_117"],"excerpt":"The Court has also held that the disposal of shares falls within the concept of transfer of securities (judgment of 7 September 2006, Organon Portuguesa , C-193/04, EU:C:2006:519, paragraph 20).","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"e6622f7c25d59151d369a1e85d536e2ab60d196dcaa93587d0d0c4dc54601cc1"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~cites~c-251-06","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-251/06","id":"eu:c-251-06","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-251-06"},"paragraph_ids":["para_136"],"excerpt":"AUER , C-251/06, EU:C:2007:658, paragraphs 40 and 41, and of 9 July 2009, Commission v Spain , C-397/07, EU:C:2009:436, paragraph 29 and the case-law cited).","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"63e27861c6e5adb2498aac6c8aa6798ed3e1d4c352c8bfcf1fac0e754f3b3c07"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~cites~c-42-96","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-42/96","id":"eu:c-42-96","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-42-96"},"paragraph_ids":["para_106","para_109"],"excerpt":"In the latter case, the tax falls within the scope of Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/7 (see, by analogy, judgment of 11 December 1997, Immobiliare SIF , C-42/96, EU:C:1997:602, paragraph 25).","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"a4c2a0a7b0fff8c9bed713fedf299d61f63ba90d76b972391e29b9bdae29f760"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-837-24~cites~c-50-91","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-837-24","to":{"ref":"C-50/91","id":"eu:c-50-91","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-50-91"},"paragraph_ids":["para_132"],"excerpt":"61 Second, as is apparent from recitals 3 and 4 of Directive 2008/7, the latter seeks, inter alia, to reduce tax obstacles to the reorganisation of undertakings (see also, by analogy, judgment of 13 October 1992, Commerz-Credit-Bank , C-50/91, EU:C:1992:386, paragraph 11).","decided":"2026-06-04","hash":"ba9ed4eec6f5eea50739c4749530753a0f4531712accf8373f14d254a8c10105"}],"incoming":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-197-25~cites~c-837-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-197-25","from_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-197-25","paragraph_ids":["para_146"],"excerpt":"Full realisation of that objective presupposes that the raising of capital is burdened by indirect taxes only on the strict conditions laid down by the EU legislature (judgment of 4 June 2026, Nova Iberomoldes , C-837/24, EU:C:2026:445, paragraphs 24 to 26 and the case-law cited)."}],"acts":[],"counts":{"outgoing":29,"incoming":1,"acts":0},"follow":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24?follow=5","hash":"029db3fb8b6fb23a69f35eade49e12aea06ce9d8131cdc0998229f1f3ebd86d0"},"links":{"provisions":null,"case_law":{"precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-837-24","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-837-24","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-837-24","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-837-24"},"compact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24?view=compact","representations":{"sv":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-837-24","en":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-837-24"},"machine_languages":["en","sv"],"ref":"eu:c-837-24"},"watch":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-837-24","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-837-24","risk_changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes","node_state":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-837-24","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-837-24"},"metadata":{"schema":"novacopilot_object_metadata/1","canonical_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","official_source":null,"short_answer":null,"short_answer_status":"not_in_register","hash":"029db3fb8b6fb23a69f35eade49e12aea06ce9d8131cdc0998229f1f3ebd86d0","schema_version":"1","last_verified_at":null,"verification_status":"not_verified_yet","integrity_check_scope":"stored_content_only"},"hash":"sha256:6e4759b5ddbe21b2be38664ab460d80c3ec6abe5d8540e198f5f987d046e51f1","version":"legal-2026-11-02","expires":"2026-11-03T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-11-02+legal-2026-11-02+2026-11-02T16:22:18","content_hash":"sha256:6e4759b5ddbe21b2be38664ab460d80c3ec6abe5d8540e198f5f987d046e51f1","revalidate_after":"2026-11-03T00:47:20.035Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24","disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"},"withheld":{"links.evidence":3},"access":{"status":"partner_key_required","header":"x-partner-key","contact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt","note":"Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."},"access_class":"relationship","access_view":"public","citation":{"citation_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-837-24","cite_as":"NovaCopilot (legal.exploreworldai.com)","provenance":{"publisher":"NovaCopilot","signature":"nc-196f18456aca17a52d007f7bf7f38f4f","response_hash":"sha256:6e4759b5ddbe21b2be38664ab460d80c3ec6abe5d8540e198f5f987d046e51f1"}},"freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-11-03T03:23:05.822Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-837-24","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":7813}}