{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-738-22-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-21",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:01282d",
    "proof": "sha256:fc10ae77f9b140ec51d49a9f9d52b6e76e50b1de23e95476b98a5499d99da530",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-738-22-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-738-22-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-738-22-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-738-22-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-738-22-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-738-22-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-738-22-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~overrules~c-377-20",
        "type": "overrules",
        "label_sv": "frångår",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-377/20",
          "id": "eu:c-377-20",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-377-20"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_595",
          "para_649",
          "para_726",
          "para_730",
          "para_732",
          "para_738"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Where a competition authority seeks to show that conduct represents a departure from competition on the merits, it may use an analysis of the capability of a hypothetical as-efficient but non-dominant competitor to replicate that conduct (see, to that effect, judgment of 12 May 2022, Servizio Elettr",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "d7472a202716f2ff4bd265def0642576393d1674c402769dce4393d184f702e8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~overrules~c-440-19",
        "type": "overrules",
        "label_sv": "frångår",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-440/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1018"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Those requirements are similarly binding on the General Court where it departs from the indicative rules laid down by the Commission in its Guidelines on the method of setting fines, which are not binding on the Courts of the European Union but are capable of guiding them when they exercise their un",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "c340c61b819ccc0c69fe2b07d4e1250ca9f9f099a85474c0fc06ceaa44342a91"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~overrules~c-48-22",
        "type": "overrules",
        "label_sv": "frångår",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-48/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_558",
          "para_560",
          "para_562",
          "para_564",
          "para_566",
          "para_641",
          "para_643",
          "para_728",
          "para_736",
          "para_746",
          "para_860"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the contrary, competition on the merits may, by definition, lead to the departure from the market or the marginalisation of competitors which are less efficient and so less attractive to consumers from the point of view of, among other things, price, choice, quality or innovation (judgment of 10 ",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "df950f683c46f161bfe85b2d14fe4366b834cd9a84d96eeec0082ae3ea4165a3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~distinguishes~c-164-98",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-164/98",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_825",
          "para_856",
          "para_858"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Nonetheless, except where there is no material factor to justify that course of action, the General Court may be led, in proceedings for annulment, to interpret the reasoning of the contested measure in a manner which differs from that of its author, and even, in certain circumstances, to reject the",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "a2caf4a5823397bea4e99469688277a72442b25331cd0560783946760234a446"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~distinguishes~c-51-19",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-51/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_856",
          "para_858",
          "para_860"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Nonetheless, except where there is no material factor to justify that course of action, the General Court may be led, in proceedings for annulment, to interpret the reasoning of the contested measure in a manner which differs from that of its author, and even, in certain circumstances, to reject the",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "4591b4a5e6455aeb6f0ebf3c82113071e590cd913696a2fc718e3d5003b40e6c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~distinguishes~c-64-19",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-64/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_856",
          "para_858",
          "para_860"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Nonetheless, except where there is no material factor to justify that course of action, the General Court may be led, in proceedings for annulment, to interpret the reasoning of the contested measure in a manner which differs from that of its author, and even, in certain circumstances, to reject the",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "03797f7fca99eeba24548ffaf2dcf97609475a6aa31fb4a44a3de977b0eae2b1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-197-09",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-197/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1020"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards respect for the rights of the defence, it is also apparent from the case-law of the Court of Justice that proceedings before the Courts of the European Union are inter partes , the exercise of unlimited jurisdiction in such proceedings being no exception (see, to that effect, judgments of",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "cb681386ae487d272744d61bf0d221e4a39c9cee3c27508c70ff64cd4b1703ac"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-204-00",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-204/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_952",
          "para_979"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, when the different actions form part of an ‘overall plan’, because their identical object distorts competition within the common market, the Commission is entitled to treat everything together as a whole, including for the purposes of calculating the fine (see, to that effect, judgments of 7 J",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "fe35317ecd7f23179c6e6b2ad6ae98e35c46a3991c489f958aa76a9696a671de"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-205-00",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-205/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_952",
          "para_979"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, when the different actions form part of an ‘overall plan’, because their identical object distorts competition within the common market, the Commission is entitled to treat everything together as a whole, including for the purposes of calculating the fine (see, to that effect, judgments of 7 J",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "179fca336d69e208ed2c23a02748cfa93e55d0d28143f07ea534c218fd5772b1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-209-10",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-209/10",
          "id": "eu:c-209-10",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-209-10"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_936",
          "para_938"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be recalled, as a preliminary point, that it is for the undertaking that is in a dominant position to provide justification for behaviour that is liable to be caught by the prohibition under Article 102 TFEU (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 March 2007, British Airways ",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "678bb8443e570bf452556987eaa5e62416fff5a0904b1ab1f4031d202080f536"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-211-00",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-211/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_952",
          "para_979"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, when the different actions form part of an ‘overall plan’, because their identical object distorts competition within the common market, the Commission is entitled to treat everything together as a whole, including for the purposes of calculating the fine (see, to that effect, judgments of 7 J",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "8ead9429b774c571d6be9e1ece4b7154d745c4e5ecaff02367c7752c5459cf8a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-213-00",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-213/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_952",
          "para_979"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, when the different actions form part of an ‘overall plan’, because their identical object distorts competition within the common market, the Commission is entitled to treat everything together as a whole, including for the purposes of calculating the fine (see, to that effect, judgments of 7 J",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "4297bc4b409395e56f8925eccc1e88f50074b5e2f171e9ed48d4ae9f4c4b343e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-217-00",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-217/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_952",
          "para_979"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, when the different actions form part of an ‘overall plan’, because their identical object distorts competition within the common market, the Commission is entitled to treat everything together as a whole, including for the purposes of calculating the fine (see, to that effect, judgments of 7 J",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "2246d37d5ad60b95b9c6251ad102d554576308dce18fccf7dc604655271370e0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-219-00",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-219/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_952",
          "para_979"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, when the different actions form part of an ‘overall plan’, because their identical object distorts competition within the common market, the Commission is entitled to treat everything together as a whole, including for the purposes of calculating the fine (see, to that effect, judgments of 7 J",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "14757cfe5c2c63dc094c33ba8855f9b8af14647ea75897b3eb56eccbc19c6a3b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-238-99",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-238/99",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "ecfdb53f0b899ec55009cd1425c346659c2f4c1aa492268c6ca239ac032e0bce"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-241-91",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-241/91",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_813"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, as it appears in the judgments of 6 April 1995, RTE and ITP v Commission ( C-241/91 P and C-242/91 P , EU:C:1995:98 , paragraphs 49 and 50 ), and of 26 November 1998, Bronner ( C-7/97 , EU:C:1998:569 , paragraph 39 ), a refusal to license inte",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "73dc3e2cb11413ac6e0a0f90aafa337e0fc9adbf76b96daf392aa3b48b76e246"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-242-91",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-242/91",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_813"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, as it appears in the judgments of 6 April 1995, RTE and ITP v Commission ( C-241/91 P and C-242/91 P , EU:C:1995:98 , paragraphs 49 and 50 ), and of 26 November 1998, Bronner ( C-7/97 , EU:C:1998:569 , paragraph 39 ), a refusal to license inte",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "c3d6a3502b46942ba49b9ea89c141a51d7053de004f20cc8133421f520fb799d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-244-99",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-244/99",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "0e4bf21f4e539733392f657b4fb2237f4eb34cc86db16d27d45424d1a9aaa815"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-245-99",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-245/99",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "a03a006b9d7b5ab17b006799fc049272ae43afc41b39362d4b65ace1b564160e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-247-99",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-247/99",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "ae90a8e859ab80ef52ebf8232017f9353278baa082f863b5cd9fd246aabc597b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-250-99",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-250/99",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "dc3f48f1e2c20a8f72f0f441d7926ba9d300b4acb72cc3aad0eb2e7e81b0ff4b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-252-99",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-252/99",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "19aea4c384f7fc621ca869ad9cffdc13adb78057755cd650f371bdb7bca0117b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-254-99",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-254/99",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "0d065972242b2e48de4ccbc68550beae493cab5000c0cb4271617d84ced0211a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-295-12",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-295/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1020",
          "para_1024"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards respect for the rights of the defence, it is also apparent from the case-law of the Court of Justice that proceedings before the Courts of the European Union are inter partes , the exercise of unlimited jurisdiction in such proceedings being no exception (see, to that effect, judgments of",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "dcead5745d538c2718bddcba1487318b8a0d62ce1dce65e88d5b7b60c2480301"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-3-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-3/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1016",
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is thus empowered, in addition to carrying out a mere review of the lawfulness of those fines, to substitute its own appraisal for that of the Commission and, consequently, to cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed, where the question of the amount of the fine is before it (see, to that effe",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "6147122ec2a0e03a073f8ae5bcbeb07e0fb50c7ecd9f0321f716ce63a5ffc624"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-307-18",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-307/18",
          "id": "eu:c-307-18",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-307-18"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_245",
          "para_734"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that sense, the fact that an undertaking holds a dominant position does not disqualify it from protecting its commercial interests if they are attacked, or from the right to take such reasonable steps as it deems appropriate to protect its commercial interests (see, to that effect, judgment of 30",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "348b6a4e432b1ea0c8162f1536ea3c91c4bfb509b010982d9cc397d44788b945"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-333-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-333/21",
          "id": "eu:c-333-21",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-333-21"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_566",
          "para_728",
          "para_744"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On a market where the degree of competition is already weakened precisely because of the presence of one or more undertakings in a dominant position, such conduct covers any practice which, through recourse to means different from those governing normal competition between undertakings, has the effe",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "ffd9d66a615dceb28481fb9ac4142ebafcc475331b5b3536065411b374fd0fec"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-386-10",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-386/10",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1020",
          "para_1024"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards respect for the rights of the defence, it is also apparent from the case-law of the Court of Justice that proceedings before the Courts of the European Union are inter partes , the exercise of unlimited jurisdiction in such proceedings being no exception (see, to that effect, judgments of",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "d1bf7b2f0f0a2a6bfb031b6badfae5283f9aa45f975de12e9e0296d7f7599c7f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-42-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-42/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1016",
          "para_1018"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is thus empowered, in addition to carrying out a mere review of the lawfulness of those fines, to substitute its own appraisal for that of the Commission and, consequently, to cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed, where the question of the amount of the fine is before it (see, to that effe",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "d725b7ebe8aa95952618b040e695ab8bd89360c6ff3096749ec56beffc5f08ac"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-434-13",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-434/13",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1018"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it is settled case-law that the General Court is bound, when exercising its unlimited jurisdiction, by certain requirements, which include the duty to state reasons, by which it is bound in accordance with Article 36 of the Statute of the Court, applicable to the General Court under ",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "642485c7028904963882ff18d3d6a1cb78c4e1f91516c8efa2435de4f502f29d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-441-11",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-441/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_979",
          "para_981"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, when the different actions form part of an ‘overall plan’, because their identical object distorts competition within the common market, the Commission is entitled to treat everything together as a whole, including for the purposes of calculating the fine (see, to that effect, judgments of 7 J",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "a20bd1b3f9daca4d6d37ef4b9470312b737fbb8c457559cc603fd4527bea2029"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-580-12",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-580/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1022"
        ],
        "excerpt": "While it is common ground that, in exercising that jurisdiction, the Courts of the European Union may take all the factual circumstances into account (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 October 2002, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and Others v Commission, C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "1cd5170197579efe7525a6f8b90a850b5bdf4dc8f18614dc3904a7e795a7abd8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-680-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-680/21",
          "id": "eu:c-680-21",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-680-21"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_593"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, although, according to those principles, the burden of proof is borne either by the Commission or by the undertaking concerned, the factual evidence on which a party relies may be of such a kind as to require the other party to provide an explanation or justification, failing which it is pe",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "64013c542085f7b6725a212f96135048f5598136cad585f52fd7c4c54fe6b4f4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-7-97",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-7/97",
          "id": "eu:c-7-97",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-7-97"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_813"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, as it appears in the judgments of 6 April 1995, RTE and ITP v Commission ( C-241/91 P and C-242/91 P , EU:C:1995:98 , paragraphs 49 and 50 ), and of 26 November 1998, Bronner ( C-7/97 , EU:C:1998:569 , paragraph 39 ), a refusal to license inte",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "1cfc1ed1a1ace7de55b41fe09850041238f159ea0c2f1e0f9d5b74ab345a5317"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-89-11",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-89/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1016"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is thus empowered, in addition to carrying out a mere review of the lawfulness of those fines, to substitute its own appraisal for that of the Commission and, consequently, to cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed, where the question of the amount of the fine is before it (see, to that effe",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "34a700911add3219254122dbd9355dd753d8e5194f8dd5a8bf9be1a63c004aba"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~c-95-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-95/04",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_936"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be recalled, as a preliminary point, that it is for the undertaking that is in a dominant position to provide justification for behaviour that is liable to be caught by the prohibition under Article 102 TFEU (see, to that effect, judgments of 15 March 2007, British Airways ",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "6b1172aa715c4b9cfe914c8fedbf06a9b958d92f1a5d0cb09a9f72c7bb56d807"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~follows~t-201-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-201/04",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_231",
          "para_243",
          "para_255",
          "para_752",
          "para_811"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On that basis, it held, in paragraph 291 of that judgment, that the Commission had followed the steps which the General Court had set out, for the purpose of demonstrating the abusive nature of conduct, in its judgment of 17 September 2007, Microsoft v Commission ( T-201/04 , EU:T:2007:289 ), and th",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "a72139776d7085436a0cab0c53330aea339450629f0d61474c0646ad5ddcb222"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-123-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-123/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_622"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Such distortion must be obvious from the documents in the Court’s file, without there being any need to carry out a new assessment of the facts and the evidence (judgment of 28 September 2023, Changmao Biochemical Engineering v Commission, C-123/21 P , EU:C:2023:708 , paragraphs 121 and 122 and the ",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "8811bea97e2b0379481399be8ed09cb4fcd56576b08afd6fcc74a7bcb93bea52"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-23-14",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-23/14",
          "id": "eu:c-23-14",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-23-14"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_473"
        ],
        "excerpt": "They argue that it is apparent from the case-law, and in particular from the judgment of 6 October 2015, Post Danmark ( C-23/14 , EU:C:2015:651 , paragraph 47 ), that the Commission must establish that the exclusionary effects of an abuse are attributable to the specific conduct at issue; those effe",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "ae1f7cf06a5c63994c4830611b6330d4ca4d792aa943277f7a5a401b461de3b6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-297-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-297/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_952"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, that distortion must be obvious from the documents in the Court’s file without there being any need to carry out a new appraisal of the facts and the evidence (see judgments of 7 January 2004, Aalborg Portland and Others v Commission, C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-21",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "c3074414891dbf0ccf938d11af41740190c341f8c61e72711a99bd27bfa7041b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-413-14",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-413/14",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_229"
        ],
        "excerpt": "With regard to those conditions, the General Court recalled, in paragraphs 278 to 280 of the judgment under appeal, by reference to paragraphs 134 to 136 of the judgment of 6 September 2017, Intel v Commission ( C-413/14 P , EU:C:2017:632 ), that not every exclusionary effect is necessarily detrimen",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "d5a0fffd49a5515d981bb3beadc7fe79b9c4037c9dbdc2a0c6d25db8b6ec4d67"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-457-10",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-457/10",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_838"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In so doing, the General Court had committed the error that the Court of Justice had impugned in the judgment of 6 December 2012, AstraZeneca v Commission ( C-457/10 P , EU:C:2012:770 ), namely presuming the existence of a causal link, in breach of the principle that ‘doubt must operate to the advan",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "9c54a46ee0a38e6d7c4fe83e9003a15ffe08379f2b90b26c5c713d0246ea6c40"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-611-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-611/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_543"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To allow a party to put forward in an appeal before the Court of Justice a plea in law which it has not raised before the General Court would amount to allowing that party to bring before the Court of Justice, whose jurisdiction in appeals is limited, a wider case than that heard by the General Cour",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "ce8cb1c399a17f41b1db7666152f1d220c05d0a1a616d13edf22f73946abe71f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-617-13",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-617/13",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_1024"
        ],
        "excerpt": "With the exception of pleas involving matters of public policy which the Courts are required to raise of their own motion, it is therefore for the applicant to raise pleas in law against the measure of EU law being challenged and to adduce evidence in support of those pleas (judgments of 8 December ",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "5b27e063aeb7d306142d5d6e4b8e6145e16904ca874f308b4b9a79777720290a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-625-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-625/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_543"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To allow a party to put forward in an appeal before the Court of Justice a plea in law which it has not raised before the General Court would amount to allowing that party to bring before the Court of Justice, whose jurisdiction in appeals is limited, a wider case than that heard by the General Cour",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "173922eca712f32a638213bd68d82e50d30689b517b0bd4134343ed5f9731fdc"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-680-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-680/20",
          "id": "eu:c-680-20",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-680-20"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_568"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Operations, C-680/20 , EU:C:2023:33 , paragraph 43 ).",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "57f9b84dba28a73dd344f0550f7bb7380ae8740d702a93724de6330931baf238"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-700-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-700/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_543"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To allow a party to put forward in an appeal before the Court of Justice a plea in law which it has not raised before the General Court would amount to allowing that party to bring before the Court of Justice, whose jurisdiction in appeals is limited, a wider case than that heard by the General Cour",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "a2c757a53dee5cc331b9230b92580025f89f5644189a398c6b53e069122b54fa"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~c-738-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-738/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_71",
          "para_464"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-738/22 P,",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "e25a5358753ca979368ad4bf2ffe68d32ddfc41066c306bc9fe93598a4c5bfb1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~t-235-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-235/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_840"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The General Court thereby committed an error of law similar to that which led to the annulment of the Commission’s decision in the case giving rise to the judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022, Qualcomm v Commission (Qualcomm - exclusivity payments) ( T-235/18 , EU:T:2022:358 ).",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "d42f0e3eae3f218ea66da7d12388df4378762bd764c628279d6a4d2cde7a8621"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~t-604-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-604/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_102",
          "para_210"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By their appeal, Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. ask the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 September 2022, Google and Alphabet v Commission (Google Android) ( T-604/18 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2022:541 ), by which the General Court:",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "0ca56f92bba98ea543380b90e83b51aadc230b9983e9efd3e8b95894b3876772"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-738-22-p~cites~t-79-12",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-738-22-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-79/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_497"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It should, on the contrary, have applied the case-law arising from the judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2013, Cisco Systems and Messagenet v Commission ( T-79/12 , EU:T:2013:635 , paragraph 79 ), under which, in the absence of technical or economic constraints which prevent users from do",
        "decided": "2026-07-02",
        "hash": "544382728259e64ed96a661ef65f88f8b2b5c75a0807dadfcab2dd5a8432aff2"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 51,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-738-22-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "ee9993e34bb381a7ec93de846527773a166c2d8db1fa5b2536a23dc6f3405419"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-738-22-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-738-22-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-738-22-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-738-22-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-738-22-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-738-22-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-738-22-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-738-22-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "hash": "sha256:fc10ae77f9b140ec51d49a9f9d52b6e76e50b1de23e95476b98a5499d99da530",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-21",
  "expires": "2026-10-23T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-21+legal-2026-10-21+2026-10-21T16:46:51",
    "content_hash": "sha256:fc10ae77f9b140ec51d49a9f9d52b6e76e50b1de23e95476b98a5499d99da530",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-22T10:21:44.489Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-738-22-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}