{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-11-03","fingerprint":"ewai:se:f5b705","proof":"sha256:5543fc52ffde974ec3c1a6b4d8a1c1871d1d6679c3b006268af332524e32cddc","jurisdiction":"se","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","object_type":"edge","object_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","schema_version":"1","schema":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","judgment":{"id":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680"},"siblings":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","relation":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","change":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","status":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","element":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","decision":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680"},"source":"NovaCopilot","precedent_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","item":{"judgment":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","outgoing":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~distinguishes~c-476-17","type":"distinguishes","label_sv":"särskiljer","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-476/17","id":"eu:c-476-17","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-476-17"},"paragraph_ids":["para_240"],"excerpt":"On the other, the General Court wrongly referred, in paragraph 60 of the judgment under appeal, to the Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Pelham and Others ( C-476/17 , EU:C:2018:1002 ), concerning the interpretation of the scope of the so-called quotation exception in Directive 2001/29/EC of th","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"fabee73a606c489eb43230c753c5d3227030435a5650c6edf98278d1c9dd6265"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~follows~c-111-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-111/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_210","para_212","para_216"],"excerpt":"That article states, inter alia, that every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially by those institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union (see, to that effect, judgment of 11 January 2024, Hamers v Cedefop, C-111/22 P , EU:C:2024:5 , paragraphs 44 and ","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"d9d25a7cac8e20024dfb2fe7730a5db04ef5f57a82838ae52427b50e68f1ed26"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~follows~c-291-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-291/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_214","para_218"],"excerpt":"In accordance with the latter component, on which the appellant relies, each institution, body, office or agency of the European Union must offer sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt as to any bias (judgment of 14 March 2024, D & A Pharma v Commission and EMA, C-291/22 P , EU:C:2024","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"cae68fc5ca26a4554d430d21d3355f0209d3606423c91f18828e9c23dc7d9021"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~follows~c-947-19","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-947/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_206"],"excerpt":"In that regard, it must be borne in mind that, according to the settled case-law of the Court of Justice, the General Court is the sole judge of whether the information available to it concerning the cases before it needs to be supplemented (judgment of 4 March 2021, Liaño Reig v SRB, C-947/19 P , E","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"593b5ee6ddb53ea95c6b132c1ae39bbd5fc0bc0e06be278ca08d145798cc6857"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-218-23","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-218/23","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_222"],"excerpt":"It follows that the appraisal of the facts by the General Court does not constitute, save where the clear sense of the evidence produced before it is distorted, a question of law which is subject, as such, to review by the Court of Justice (judgment of 25 April 2024, NS v Parliament, C-218/23 P , EU","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"0ba3bd38af602d40630e8666fcf9c6251f69a456470cab1ea7a0cf38be582894"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-274-99","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-274/99","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_285"],"excerpt":"In that regard, it follows from the case-law of the Court of Justice that it must be borne in mind that, whenever officials’ right to freedom of expression is in issue, their duties and responsibilities assume a special significance which justifies leaving the EU institution or body concerned a cert","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"bdb341d867e25cd439e088c4612fd525434f7bc0db385621de1e61f79fee74f5"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-366-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-366/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_369"],"excerpt":"The Court of Justice has also held that an appeal lacking any coherent structure which simply makes general statements and contains no specific indications as to the points of the decision under appeal which may be vitiated by an error of law must be dismissed as clearly inadmissible (judgment of 15","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"272b2e48926105694ed7cc13b3eab0b32a40e0f1836530f192bb466c4b0f2a09"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-446-19","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-446/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_287"],"excerpt":"More particularly, the duty of loyalty, laid down in Article 12 of the Staff Regulations, means not only that the officials concerned must refrain from conduct which might reflect adversely upon their position and is detrimental to the respect due to the institution and its authorities, but also tha","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"497656015614dc5ef6d516040b2ae1680d4886beaa59288b722eae9594e0b17a"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-46-22","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-46/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_367","para_369"],"excerpt":"It follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested ","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"c5370b251adc5e824ed5657d9665b6fb1b16d0c8c3cb3626eebc7661fb7f1774"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-524-22","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-524/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_224"],"excerpt":"Furthermore, where an appellant claims that the evidence has been distorted, he or she must indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted by the General Court and show the errors of appraisal which, in his or her view, led to that distortion (judgments of 27 April 2023, Fondazione C","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"c431055fd7767c2b2378059dcee28e7bd669258f75b357056d55863003fccc1c"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-527-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-527/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_273","para_275"],"excerpt":"Moreover, in so far as the appellant claims that the General Court failed to examine the consequences of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 November 1999, Hashman and Harrup v. the United Kingdom (CE:ECHR:1999:1125JUD002559494), it must be recalled that a plea alleging that the","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"7d4b2858c2201ccad6fa722d600a14ab12d5abde5dd195006b6f768b2d4cf05c"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-549-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-549/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_224"],"excerpt":"Furthermore, where an appellant claims that the evidence has been distorted, he or she must indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted by the General Court and show the errors of appraisal which, in his or her view, led to that distortion (judgments of 27 April 2023, Fondazione C","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"848dfed1a20afe69e996f9f54ff5acde3aaab728919bcc327402c1e05f4d5e23"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~c-680-22","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"C-680/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_5"],"excerpt":"In Case C-680/22 P,","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"daee13f470d94d57b268f3396bba0da917bdd0af9424eea5723d6ead7908f2b4"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~f-106-13","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"F-106/13","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_76"],"excerpt":"By judgment of 8 October 2015, DD v FRA ( F-106/13 and F-25/14 , [the annulment judgment,] EU:F:2015:118 ), the Civil Service Tribunal annulled the decision to terminate on the grounds that, prior to the adoption of the decision, the Director of FRA had not expressly informed the applicant that, on ","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"942cf79536170a3a877bcdbcc0d583e29f9d378d0cef9ecd8fca1956608a9ad1"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~f-25-14","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"F-25/14","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_76"],"excerpt":"By judgment of 8 October 2015, DD v FRA ( F-106/13 and F-25/14 , [the annulment judgment,] EU:F:2015:118 ), the Civil Service Tribunal annulled the decision to terminate on the grounds that, prior to the adoption of the decision, the Director of FRA had not expressly informed the applicant that, on ","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"0efeb1b5978b04405a38f9e710259d6e6ec82b4f7ea145e4e3051b9abc9eb180"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~f-58-10","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"F-58/10","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_193","para_230"],"excerpt":"Consequently, the appellant submits that, contrary to what the General Court held in paragraph 192 of the judgment under appeal, the case-law arising from the judgment of 18 September 2012, Allgeier v FRA ( F-58/10 , EU:F:2012:130 ), is relevant in the present case.","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"7add29b7c0b91a7a1822aa31803cb769e547cfc14e0d29370665e34fc5678911"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~t-203-03","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"T-203/03","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_314"],"excerpt":"The General Court therefore erred in law in holding that the appellant had been sufficiently informed when the investigation was initiated and in applying by analogy the case-law established in the judgment of 5 October 2005, Rasmussen v Commission ( T-203/03 , EU:T:2005:346 ).","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"bb1f5e3663b600e3232bb3f85f66143366f336f9e4967763f2c4c3a2808b6049"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~t-308-10","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"T-308/10","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_320"],"excerpt":"The appellant contends, thirdly, that the General Court erred in law, in paragraph 111 of the judgment under appeal, by not applying the case-law established in the judgment of 8 July 2008, Franchet and Byk v Commission ( T-48/05 , EU:T:2008:257 ), confirmed by the judgment of 12 July 2012, Commissi","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"1d9b521b1d07fe1ddfdcc5f16838836903914e873bdc09ad199e3c9279fa521f"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~t-470-20","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"T-470/20","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_21"],"excerpt":"By his appeal, DD seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 7 September 2022, DD v FRA ( T-470/20 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2022:511 ), by which that court dismissed his action seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the European Union Agency for","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"b3660aa9dca87449f74400c5a293edca5dc5b66e6b55262fbab0c691b97f15ee"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680~cites~t-48-05","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","to":{"ref":"T-48/05","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_320"],"excerpt":"The appellant contends, thirdly, that the General Court erred in law, in paragraph 111 of the judgment under appeal, by not applying the case-law established in the judgment of 8 July 2008, Franchet and Byk v Commission ( T-48/05 , EU:T:2008:257 ), confirmed by the judgment of 12 July 2012, Commissi","decided":"2024-12-12","hash":"944cebcb5badb53909d9a5cd2ec756200bee83d54d6c1ece2c0f2daf74b96822"}],"incoming":[],"acts":[],"counts":{"outgoing":20,"incoming":0,"acts":0},"follow":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680?follow=5","hash":"639f0ae16f217c4d151520f037024ad5998df9575d1e4b2f44e7094d8b3ac261"},"links":{"provisions":null,"case_law":{"precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680"},"compact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680?view=compact","representations":{"sv":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","en":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-680-22-p-62022cj0680"},"machine_languages":["en","sv"],"ref":"eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680"},"watch":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-680-22-p-62022cj0680","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-680-22-p-62022cj0680","risk_changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes","node_state":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-680-22-p-62022cj0680","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680"},"metadata":{"schema":"novacopilot_object_metadata/1","canonical_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","official_source":null,"short_answer":null,"short_answer_status":"not_in_register","hash":"639f0ae16f217c4d151520f037024ad5998df9575d1e4b2f44e7094d8b3ac261","schema_version":"1","last_verified_at":null,"verification_status":"not_verified_yet","integrity_check_scope":"stored_content_only"},"hash":"sha256:5543fc52ffde974ec3c1a6b4d8a1c1871d1d6679c3b006268af332524e32cddc","version":"legal-2026-11-03","expires":"2026-11-04T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-11-03+legal-2026-11-03+2026-11-03T14:24:16","content_hash":"sha256:5543fc52ffde974ec3c1a6b4d8a1c1871d1d6679c3b006268af332524e32cddc","revalidate_after":"2026-11-03T16:05:07.806Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","withheld":{"links.evidence":3},"access":{"status":"partner_key_required","header":"x-partner-key","contact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt","note":"Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."},"access_class":"relationship","access_view":"public","citation":{"citation_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","cite_as":"NovaCopilot (legal.exploreworldai.com)","provenance":{"publisher":"NovaCopilot","signature":"nc-1d531bff2739fa5074e7cf2cc051edc5","response_hash":"sha256:5543fc52ffde974ec3c1a6b4d8a1c1871d1d6679c3b006268af332524e32cddc"}},"freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-11-03T15:05:08.359Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-680-22-p-62022cj0680","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":5753}}