{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-643-16",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-643-16)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:bb7cbc",
    "proof": "sha256:988c16ec82ff5714e446b9ab95c35ed5b8cd9e7e54884e43ff2cbfe68965a0a3",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-643-16",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-643-16",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-643-16"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-643-16",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-643-16",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-643-16",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-643-16",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-643-16",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-643-16",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-643-16",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-643-16",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-643-16",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-643-16",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-643-16",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-643-16"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-643-16",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-643-16",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~follows~c-42-07",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-42/07",
          "id": "eu:c-42-07",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-42-07"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_167"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it is sufficient that both the subject matter of the dispute in the main proceedings and the main issues raised for the EU legal order may be understood from the request for a preliminary ruling in order to enable the Member States and other interested parties to submit their observa",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "ff2a3bb834ab4d20454daa13a86e34347238531630603f1f4f23707fda4e495f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~follows~c-477-14",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-477/14",
          "id": "eu:c-477-14",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-477-14"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_161",
          "para_173",
          "para_175",
          "para_181",
          "para_183"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards, further, whether the referring court has adequately set out the reasons why it is uncertain as to the interpretation and validity of the provisions at issue in the main proceedings, it does in fact follow from the spirit of cooperation which must prevail in the operation of the prelimina",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "369f98e922c1adb93024cee1c5f9770a3b5a3317c709daf4d58e568185c9e2a2"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~follows~c-616-15",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-616/15",
          "id": "eu:c-616-15",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-616-15"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_204"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it must be borne in mind that, in accordance with the Court’s settled case-law, in interpreting a provision of EU law it is necessary to consider not only its wording but also the context in which it occurs and the objectives pursued by the rules of which it is part (judgment of 21 S",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "f059cc2c25f6a34988a99970b5d92c8b503a78417daf9318b52cb1225a5139b7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~follows~c-62-14",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-62/14",
          "id": "eu:c-62-14",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-62-14"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_157",
          "para_159",
          "para_163",
          "para_183",
          "para_272",
          "para_296"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It must be recalled that, according to the Court’s settled case-law, the principle of proportionality requires that acts of the EU institutions should be appropriate for attaining the legitimate objectives pursued by the legislation at issue and should not go beyond what is necessary in order to ach",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "f117dbd4bb8ec5f513efd6bf00cee0d6d7aa21a488dab4224bde9f351ac8ac77"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-26-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-26/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_274"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, the Court has repeatedly held that if an act of general application discloses the essential objective pursued by the institution, it would be excessive to require a specific statement of reasons for the various technical choices made (judgment of 3 March 2016, Spain v Commission, C-26/1",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "9ff8e5b545601b5302d532cf8224fc5955347354c63a7ddeb136220e1c659e16"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-275-07",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-275/07",
          "id": "eu:c-275-07",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-275-07"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_218"
        ],
        "excerpt": "If, however, the EU legislature had wished to restrict the scope of that provision, so that that would be the case, it could have made express provision to that effect (see, by analogy, judgment of 19 March 2009, Commission v Italy, C-275/07 , EU:C:2009:169 , paragraph 99 ).",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "7f3148d1a009b83a8bb55ca505eef9af75ed83385a73707d939b579906967ab1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-304-16",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-304/16",
          "id": "eu:c-304-16",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-304-16"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_256"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That interpretation is not called into question by the argument put forward by MasterCard Europe that the situations in which a three party payment card scheme is subject to the access obligation should be the same as those in which such a system is subject to the obligations relating to interchange",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "ac790e77a1716d83f03df0a22c3eec572e415b9f64dac3342cd52f26dab36e1e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-308-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-308/06",
          "id": "eu:c-308-06",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-308-06"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_181"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards, third, the argument that the bringing of the action in the main proceedings, seeking review of the legality of ‘intention and/or obligation’ of the national authority to apply or give effect to Directive 2015/2366, is a means of circumventing the system of legal remedies provided for by ",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "e7336cb6255deb298f8838e524b11bf45363d34d1ca6a937057a61c2be78f83b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-343-09",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-343/09",
          "id": "eu:c-343-09",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-343-09"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_181"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards, third, the argument that the bringing of the action in the main proceedings, seeking review of the legality of ‘intention and/or obligation’ of the national authority to apply or give effect to Directive 2015/2366, is a means of circumventing the system of legal remedies provided for by ",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "cf44b2208d8f25aa46ca756378cedf2aa5e5211056edc3b95cea999e301876de"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-491-01",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-491/01",
          "id": "eu:c-491-01",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-491-01"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_161",
          "para_181",
          "para_183"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Since the referring court has been called upon to resolve that disagreement and since it considers that there is a real point of contention between the parties in the main proceedings as to the interpretation and validity of the relevant provisions of that directive, it is not obvious that the dispu",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "8cb5697a305d30250455536bf55677395b342235e757bc28f7963457c824ba56"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-547-14",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-547/14",
          "id": "eu:c-547-14",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-547-14"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_181",
          "para_183"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards, third, the argument that the bringing of the action in the main proceedings, seeking review of the legality of ‘intention and/or obligation’ of the national authority to apply or give effect to Directive 2015/2366, is a means of circumventing the system of legal remedies provided for by ",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "65368944aeb29816000a3efa3bec22284c9c8df068c1151bdad077cf02605c1c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-567-14",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-567/14",
          "id": "eu:c-567-14",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-567-14"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_171"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that the referring court has adequately defined the factual and legal framework within which it has made its request for an interpretation of EU law so as to enable the Court to provide a useful reply to that request (see, by analogy, judgment of 7 July 2016, Genentech, C-567/14 , EU:C:20",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "2a94940c8568981c07d2617dc88786f5cb1f3f63acac8067cb7c2f8c6c98585f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-643-16~cites~c-58-08",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-643-16",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-58/08",
          "id": "eu:c-58-08",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-58-08"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_298"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus the criterion to be applied is not whether a measure adopted in such an area was the only or the best possible measure, since its legality can be affected only if the measure is manifestly inappropriate having regard to the objective which the competent institution is seeking to pursue (judgmen",
        "decided": "2018-02-07",
        "hash": "8721376f362f78b5cc5ccde5e9645624b610c78f7dc51026311ce1b03031b034"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-10-23-62023cj0010~follows~c-643-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-10-23-62023cj0010",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-10-23-62023cj0010",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_192"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, regarding more specifically the requirement relating to the content of a request for a preliminary ruling laid down in Article 94(a) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court has held that it is sufficient that both the subject matter of the dispute in the main proceedings and the main issue"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-643-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-911-19",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_251"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the contrary, it is apparent from the case-law of the Court that a request for a preliminary ruling on validity must be regarded as admissible where it has been made in the course of a genuine dispute in which a question on the validity of an EU act is raised indirectly, even if that act has not "
      }
    ],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 13,
      "incoming": 2,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-643-16?follow=5",
    "hash": "85b6f1f1dcad3dd3a9b31a18a4fdeb11da2f2f18d77f617e6ca382a77728165b"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-643-16",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-643-16",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-643-16",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-643-16"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-643-16?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-643-16",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-643-16"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-643-16"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-643-16",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-643-16",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-643-16"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-643-16",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "85b6f1f1dcad3dd3a9b31a18a4fdeb11da2f2f18d77f617e6ca382a77728165b",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:988c16ec82ff5714e446b9ab95c35ed5b8cd9e7e54884e43ff2cbfe68965a0a3",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
  "expires": "2026-10-27T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-25+legal-2026-10-25+2026-10-25T13:37:31",
    "content_hash": "sha256:988c16ec82ff5714e446b9ab95c35ed5b8cd9e7e54884e43ff2cbfe68965a0a3",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-26T10:20:00.186Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-643-16",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}