{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-559-23-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-23",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:00a952",
    "proof": "sha256:db176d524cfd4f5676b70e1f5dd295be3770f78e7ceff83be1d8bbb5304b09c6",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-559-23-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-559-23-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-559-23-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-559-23-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-559-23-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-559-23-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~distinguishes~c-447-17",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-447/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_86"
        ],
        "excerpt": "45 Furthermore, it is clear from the case-law of the Court of Justice that limitation constitutes an objection to admissibility which, unlike procedural time limits, is not absolute, but extinguishes the action for damages solely at the request of the defendant, since compliance with a limitation pe",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "5385577e54dce0f1466fb1af9d1fb0a183772a909605ee226f1a126c5dc636c6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~distinguishes~c-479-17",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-479/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_86"
        ],
        "excerpt": "45 Furthermore, it is clear from the case-law of the Court of Justice that limitation constitutes an objection to admissibility which, unlike procedural time limits, is not absolute, but extinguishes the action for damages solely at the request of the defendant, since compliance with a limitation pe",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "18b4498618f13089cedb865fd8f5a72c47c301292f4fbd3eb3ea36fba9f221ae"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-130-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-130/19",
          "id": "eu:c-130-19",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-130-19"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_114",
          "para_129"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That provision gives effect to the right, enshrined in Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter, of every person to be heard before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken (see, to that effect, judgment of 30 September 2021, Court of Auditors v Pinxten , C-130/19, EU:C:2021:78",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "a18538869d30d4dd267af4a870787539084519895c5243d57942fa6f9f8ff479"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-156-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-156/21",
          "id": "eu:c-156-21-62021cj0156",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-156-21-62021cj0156"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_70",
          "para_96",
          "para_101",
          "para_102",
          "para_103",
          "para_109"
        ],
        "excerpt": "56 As the General Court correctly pointed out in paragraph 117 of the judgment under appeal, in principle, to allow an applicant to put before the Court a legal opinion from an institution the disclosure of which has not been authorised by that institution would be contrary to the requirements of a ",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "c96f85cff35b51b690f85e70be74f4fcfbac4efdd376b20fe50386fd2c17e934"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-23-00",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-23/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_88"
        ],
        "excerpt": "47 Nevertheless, the General Court recalled in paragraph 23 of that judgment that, in accordance with case-law (see, to that effect, judgments of 26 February 2002, Council v Boehringer , C-23/00 P, EU:C:2002:118, paragraph 52, and of 24 March 2022, GVN v Commission , C-666/20 P, EU:C:2022:225, parag",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "5be0c09e795ef11b8a23584ef4143b08323ae3929e8979b67593ebfcf6289cc4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-469-11",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-469/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_153"
        ],
        "excerpt": "104 In accordance with the case-law of the Court, the limitation period laid down in Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union begins to run once the requirements governing the obligation to provide compensation for damage are satisfied and, in particular, once the dama",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "1ac7d6f128a4733648f1a3f7e0ff8cb72e3ef50acae70238c6ecd3c47ddeb9f7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-619-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-619/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_52",
          "para_162"
        ],
        "excerpt": "113 As regards the first condition, the existence of a sufficiently serious breach depends on the discretion enjoyed by the EU institution, body, office or agency which has allegedly acted in breach of that rule and on whether it has manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits placed on that discr",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "0d7c0e6325364aec7e21b1058cb2164c80a7314e2c5d3d8fad4fb0fb4347dc1d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-620-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-620/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_52",
          "para_162"
        ],
        "excerpt": "113 As regards the first condition, the existence of a sufficiently serious breach depends on the discretion enjoyed by the EU institution, body, office or agency which has allegedly acted in breach of that rule and on whether it has manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits placed on that discr",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "45d38fdf3e5094b87d36b9241afc792289fec17c5424d53f5ee5e7227047a898"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-666-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-666/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_88"
        ],
        "excerpt": "47 Nevertheless, the General Court recalled in paragraph 23 of that judgment that, in accordance with case-law (see, to that effect, judgments of 26 February 2002, Council v Boehringer , C-23/00 P, EU:C:2002:118, paragraph 52, and of 24 March 2022, GVN v Commission , C-666/20 P, EU:C:2022:225, parag",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "7f0187e80aeeeb180bed7def549bd2d626d5b8a53c623713e1421312c11be598"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-679-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-679/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_161"
        ],
        "excerpt": "112 It is clear from settled case-law that the European Union may incur non-contractual liability under the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU only if a number of conditions are fulfilled, namely the existence of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individua",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "bb43026e8694cd5eae2cdf1f07786b66f5c244c084546060c3da0b8e515517fa"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-755-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-755/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_163",
          "para_164"
        ],
        "excerpt": "114 Furthermore, as regards the question whether the rule of law infringed is intended to confer rights on individuals, it should be recalled that, in accordance with settled case-law, the rights of individuals arise not only where they are expressly granted by provisions of EU law, but also by reas",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "209f9579444abbbeb0a6b9d9a077e18e8549117ce4c8c642d1c65629fa7ce3d1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~follows~c-787-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-787/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_130",
          "para_131"
        ],
        "excerpt": "82 Nevertheless, persons subject to an OLAF investigation do not have the right to access the OLAF file until OLAF’s final report has been adopted (see, to that effect, judgment of 30 November 2023, Sistem ecologica v Commission , C-787/22 P, EU:C:2023:940, paragraph 155).",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "3dc3bf732ad8bd903740f3494a79457f3f545446729652a1d55acb1739727c6b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~c-136-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-136/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_137",
          "para_138"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To that end, that party may rely on any form of evidence, since the principle in EU law is that of the unfettered production of evidence (judgment of 18 December 2025, Hamoudi v Frontext , C-136/24 P, EU:C:2025:977, paragraph 71 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "c8e04d8cedf88ba23775dee26d80b45959b47b58be0c2adb8a2078b6c4bef12e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~c-183-17",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-183/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_52"
        ],
        "excerpt": "21 By judgment of 31 January 2019, International Management Group v Commission (C-183/17 P and C-184/17 P, EU:C:2019:78), the Court of Justice set aside the judgments referred to in paragraph 19 above, the decision of 16 December 2014 and the decision of 8 May 2015.",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "d684cfba4ef977dd5b1486c3e7e6cc3cd69960900732f89898316e679e344b3e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~c-184-17",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-184/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_52"
        ],
        "excerpt": "21 By judgment of 31 January 2019, International Management Group v Commission (C-183/17 P and C-184/17 P, EU:C:2019:78), the Court of Justice set aside the judgments referred to in paragraph 19 above, the decision of 16 December 2014 and the decision of 8 May 2015.",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "3b06f8ea99d5f3a8f5092b79ff70ba57d988064758fe2ec2e4b64bebc13f57d1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~c-348-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-348/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_113",
          "para_114",
          "para_115"
        ],
        "excerpt": "68 As regards the principle of equality of arms, which is a corollary of the very concept of a fair hearing, guaranteed in particular by Article 47 of the Charter, that principle requires that each party must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case, including his or her evide",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "9d9bf4794c51262b873c4e9887a4807db97c6c145c6d4613b20ba617e687234c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~c-559-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-559/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-559/23 P,",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "c564f73bb07a3c7d9087c1b459b1d0c9020c456bbab9af01b0aed789008e10ca"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~c-89-08",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-89/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_111"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In order to satisfy the requirements associated with the right to a fair hearing, it is important for the parties to be apprised of, and to be able to debate and be heard on, the matters of fact and of law which will determine the outcome of the proceedings (judgment of 2 December 2009, Commission v",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "75c956c424f999a3daa3ae0636af5dce08494895a9a9a36cf9f89cd151b83a9b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~t-29-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-29/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_42",
          "para_50"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The appellant brought an action before the General Court for the annulment of that decision, registered as Case T-29/15.",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "de81f744f489e4a866c81b1c369b2f933d037baeb4d8505cd839be3c72ebfa2d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~t-381-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-381/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_47",
          "para_50",
          "para_52"
        ],
        "excerpt": "16 The appellant brought an action before the General Court, registered as Case T-381/15, seeking, inter alia, the annulment of the decision of 8 May 2015 and compensation for material and non-material damage.",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "9cc7242234b881d995d2db014d9186f983f5e90c8dfd79d972fae957925d0781"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~t-48-05",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-48/05",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_121"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Accordingly, the appellant contends that the General Court erred in law and disregarded the guidance drawn from the judgment of 8 October 1986, Leussink v Commission (169/83 and 136/84, EU:C:1986:371), by holding, solely on the basis of such a suggestion by the Commission, that the Commission was no",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "13838090dc7fd362dbfea7cb922b728b018e413cdb6b12dfe8024cf3da9048ac"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-559-23-p~cites~t-752-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-559-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-752/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_20"
        ],
        "excerpt": "1 By its appeal, International Management Group (IMG) seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 28 June 2023, IMG v Commission (T-752/20, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2023:366), by which the General Court dismissed its action seeking compensation for the",
        "decided": "2026-07-16",
        "hash": "4dd420a7f974a54c56dfde67fe789598f3453852b0c01aa008b996cb29d74a63"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 22,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-559-23-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "9049181f8793f38735b10a9172274286523c8cb829b4f42f5eaae51599b4efff"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-559-23-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-559-23-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-559-23-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-559-23-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-559-23-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-559-23-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-559-23-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-559-23-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-559-23-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "9049181f8793f38735b10a9172274286523c8cb829b4f42f5eaae51599b4efff",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:db176d524cfd4f5676b70e1f5dd295be3770f78e7ceff83be1d8bbb5304b09c6",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-23",
  "expires": "2026-10-25T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-23+legal-2026-10-23+2026-10-23T14:34:08",
    "content_hash": "sha256:db176d524cfd4f5676b70e1f5dd295be3770f78e7ceff83be1d8bbb5304b09c6",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-24T01:58:31.149Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-559-23-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}