{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-499-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-07",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:507bce",
    "proof": "sha256:b50888b85767bde3c27320fe01f7ff2c948f42de495f7c0e0871cbc521fe1a9f",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-499-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-499-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-499-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-499-24-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-499-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-499-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-499-24-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-177-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-177/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_164",
          "para_397"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, the statement of the reasons on which a judgment of the General Court is based must clearly and unequivocally disclose the General Court’s reasoning in such a way as to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons for the decision taken and the Court of Justic",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "858bdf5bdeb9d0666766927eaf4f25d248b86cd6ca203c8c95f08071c71f9271"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-179-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-179/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_164",
          "para_397"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, the statement of the reasons on which a judgment of the General Court is based must clearly and unequivocally disclose the General Court’s reasoning in such a way as to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons for the decision taken and the Court of Justic",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "2205418d2c1b035507e8357dfbfd3f5d3642ad2032ebbd2e774b494e460cd516"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-260-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-260/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_364"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, the Commission is required, in accordance with the objective of the basic regulation, which is to establish objectively whether there is dumping and injury in order to impose suitable anti-dumping duties, to examine with all due care all the information available to it (see, to that eff",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "46894a68e017df22685d7ea6b8bf625764d0e7f29d461fe423265c47a3252bfe"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-269-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-269/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_315"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The judicial review of that margin of discretion must be limited to verifying whether the procedural rules have been complied with, whether the facts relied on to make the contested choice of currency have been accurately stated, and whether there has been a manifest error of appraisal of those fact",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "398642441c4b2a0f55d1fb72099fc8aa15a3e076a3893e76f27e6aa1a8fd0263"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-272-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-272/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_315"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The judicial review of that margin of discretion must be limited to verifying whether the procedural rules have been complied with, whether the facts relied on to make the contested choice of currency have been accurately stated, and whether there has been a manifest error of appraisal of those fact",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "9d5b667ef8b16774c515e3a617f84aa62b3507a339d3e2bbe6deea3ce342d426"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-4-17",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-4/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_355"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, an appellant is entitled to lodge an appeal relying on grounds which arise from the judgment under appeal itself and which seek to criticise, in law, its correctness (judgments of 6 September 2018, Czech Republic v Commission, C-4/17 P , EU:C:2018:678 , paragraph 24 , ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "b3f74299c17dadcfa481bce5fdcee0c1c71024be36db93b8faea6ea8b52282b7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-50-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-50/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_218",
          "para_355"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, an appellant is entitled to lodge an appeal relying on grounds which arise from the judgment under appeal itself and which seek to criticise, in law, its correctness (judgments of 6 September 2018, Czech Republic v Commission, C-4/17 P , EU:C:2018:678 , paragraph 24 , ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "20bc2c031d97cf170c94e7dcda11eca9f25830cd8194538b0de737b6b082c80a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-61-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-61/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_370",
          "para_372"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, in so far as no provision in the basic regulation confers on the Commission any power to compel the interested parties to participate in the investigation or to provide information, that institution is reliant on the voluntary cooperation of those parties in supplying the necessary informat",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "2c69272a6d248012c9db689f5f01492c6ccd5154b68c0f96b1fd41ef374b1a91"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-635-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-635/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_259"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it is not sufficient to show that a document could be interpreted differently from the interpretation adopted by the General Court (see, to that effect, judgment of 16 February 2023, Commission v Italy and Spain ( C-635/20 P , EU:C:2023:98 , paragraph 127 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "d348cd78a74fa68553f45ae5556cccdd4f37e06a4d627884c2a3f94822fec02b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-781-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-781/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_164",
          "para_397"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, the statement of the reasons on which a judgment of the General Court is based must clearly and unequivocally disclose the General Court’s reasoning in such a way as to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons for the decision taken and the Court of Justic",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "148cad312c209a1f7bba3ae10ea13c0c3b99a2bc143f666287a81fc589af8cc1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~follows~c-891-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-891/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_184"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to the appellants, it is apparent in particular from paragraph 31 of the judgment of 20 January 2022, Commission v Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube ( C-891/19 P , EU:C:2022:38 ), that the primacy of international agreements concluded by the European Union requires that secondary EU legislation",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "897b958cbf39aabf0b6da2e026a9b2daafb668af01f6509e899b7bfedb6a5bb9"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~c-136-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-136/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_216"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "7f27074d9d951fb80ee8b462d2c6e6d62d33eb6d6e0b4dd28ca61e0aed45213e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~c-248-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-248/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_282"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, an alleged failure to have regard to the rules of evidence is a question of law, which is admissible in an appeal (judgment of 26 January 2017, Maxcom v City Cycle Industries, C-248/15 P, C-254/15 P and C-260/15 P , EU:C:2017:62 , paragraphs 52 and 53 ).",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "5e44c4d1163256a36e34faace5566ae83846f3017da5182bf7847b396bd153e9"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~c-254-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-254/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_282"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, an alleged failure to have regard to the rules of evidence is a question of law, which is admissible in an appeal (judgment of 26 January 2017, Maxcom v City Cycle Industries, C-248/15 P, C-254/15 P and C-260/15 P , EU:C:2017:62 , paragraphs 52 and 53 ).",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "a05a54dea8fd7526c71efd91aebd15a1ebf7340cd17a03642e73230063bcc4e6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~c-260-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-260/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_282"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, an alleged failure to have regard to the rules of evidence is a question of law, which is admissible in an appeal (judgment of 26 January 2017, Maxcom v City Cycle Industries, C-248/15 P, C-254/15 P and C-260/15 P , EU:C:2017:62 , paragraphs 52 and 53 ).",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "70c7b18564d8df28a09803d77cedc99bb2d3050471ddc7a77541633951b20573"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~c-499-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-499/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-499/24 P,",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "ec47bcd5db2916f4aa373320818c8f3224fd222e65b3c587d6c79ddb81010490"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~c-586-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-586/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_397"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, the obligation to state reasons does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case; the General Court’s reasoning may therefore be implicit on condition that it enables the persons conce",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "36c931dd245e82891ba37029f678f4caf7efeea28f7075c674ee8cb6291b79f8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~c-718-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-718/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_397"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, the obligation to state reasons does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case; the General Court’s reasoning may therefore be implicit on condition that it enables the persons conce",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "39814f81fe24532b8cbda26174483bd836a48bfc2650a55786d27130b02caa5b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~t-629-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-629/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_24"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By their appeal, Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAȘ, İskenderun Demir ve Çelik AȘ and Erdemir Çelik Servis Merkezi Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ (‘Erdemir’, ‘Isdemir’ and ‘Ersem’, respectively), ask the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 May 2024, Er",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "d22b3ba1f42e6b7c8f424d263154fd20215e1cda9c46e4069f5f443f765e2e56"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-499-24-p~cites~t-762-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-499-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-762/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_277"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Referring to the judgment of 21 February 2024, Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical and Others v Commission ( T-762/20 , EU:T:2024:113 , paragraph 129 ), according to which the EU institutions are required, inter alia, under the principle of good administration, to indicate to the party requesting an adju",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "ee2b4165607bbe737c31737c719ccc8c3fa48c088357a5434d42da81a7cadf25"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 20,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-499-24-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "d0f07667997395bb3034575d408b3adb7b9b12d8b42b07dc5db369d2ad21c7b9"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-499-24-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-499-24-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-499-24-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-499-24-p"
    },
    "evidence": {
      "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-499-24-p",
      "chain_verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes/verify",
      "object_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/objects/changes"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-499-24-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-499-24-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-499-24-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-499-24-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "hash": "sha256:b50888b85767bde3c27320fe01f7ff2c948f42de495f7c0e0871cbc521fe1a9f",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-07",
  "expires": "2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-07+legal-2026-10-07+2026-10-07T16:38:30",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b50888b85767bde3c27320fe01f7ff2c948f42de495f7c0e0871cbc521fe1a9f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-07T18:12:20.742Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-499-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}