{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-498-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-05",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:51bc4e",
    "proof": "sha256:98974ac3f496bc46aeb0b3f65647c6e13298fe32682e4912bef6f45468ad159b",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "brand": {
    "product": "NovaCopilot",
    "platform": "ExploreWorldAI",
    "infrastructure": "ExploreWorld Legal",
    "infrastructure_url": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "legal_entity": "Valkiv Ventures AB",
    "permanent_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/novacopilot",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "powered_by": "Powered by NovaCopilot",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/licensvillkor",
    "contact": "stig@valkiv.com"
  },
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-498-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-498-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-498-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "obligation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/obligation/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "sanction": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/sanction/eu:c-498-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-498-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-498-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-498-24-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~overrules~c-468-15",
        "type": "overrules",
        "label_sv": "frångår",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-468/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_125",
          "para_141",
          "para_152",
          "para_156",
          "para_158",
          "para_174",
          "para_200",
          "para_237",
          "para_250",
          "para_254"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The fact that, in paragraph 49 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court decided that, among the indicia from which it could be concluded that ÇOTAȘ carried out the activities of an agent working on a commission basis, it was necessary to take into consideration the very existence of the agree",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "ad2b4dcca6bf9c4a7b93a7b31616722078e2dda8f629429cd50bf636a6222a94"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~follows~c-171-87",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-171/87",
          "id": "eu:c-171-87",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-171-87"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_158"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In order to assess whether there is a single economic entity between a producer and its distributor, ruling out an adjustment under Article 2(10)(i) of the basic regulation, it is necessary to take account of all factors relevant to the determination of the economic reality of the relationship betwe",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "4d6a197db7d1b314bcf1783190325c7542d09e2406ba24974c82d540e0c280ad"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~follows~c-252-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-252/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_190"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, according to settled case-law, that distortion must be obvious from the documents in the Court’s file, without there being any need to carry out a new assessment of the facts and the evidence (judgment of 20 June 2024, Euranimi v Commission, C-252/23 P , EU:C:2024:538 , paragraph 71 and",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "e1ec2135eb08987c1c384c75d95b5a10ab716469117b40272c004898bc3e2f9d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~follows~c-260-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-260/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_262"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is true that Article 2.3 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement corresponds to Article 2(9) of the basic regulation and the primacy of international agreements concluded by the European Union over secondary EU legislation requires that the latter be interpreted, as far as possible, in a manner consistent ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "95dbda1840134bfb022159ea0cbe743b52d08f14fb9a1f15d296eb2c65412ac1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~follows~c-269-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-269/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_188",
          "para_326"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The judicial review of that margin of discretion must be limited to verifying whether the procedural rules have been complied with, whether the facts relied on to make the contested choice of currency have been accurately stated, and whether there has been a manifest error of appraisal of those fact",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "a11527b960f88b5892a24d08648a1c6cdd24b513eea4d8f3e68cde1e3aebdd30"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~follows~c-272-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-272/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_188",
          "para_326"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The judicial review of that margin of discretion must be limited to verifying whether the procedural rules have been complied with, whether the facts relied on to make the contested choice of currency have been accurately stated, and whether there has been a manifest error of appraisal of those fact",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "ff97501a254547da5deb20888b25f00ec21531c175fa27e1fb1dc7cc5b531df1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~c-191-09",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-191/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_145",
          "para_154"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In his Opinion in the joined Cases Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP ( C-191/09 P and C-200/09 P , EU:C:2011:245 , point 66 ), Advocate General Mengozzi referred to the possibility of a producer of a third State operating on its domestic market through a company which i",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "5af652675685948545686116f64c55eb153cf1248b8c1cdc7b98e14980d84b30"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~c-200-09",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-200/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_145",
          "para_154"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In his Opinion in the joined Cases Council and Commission v Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP ( C-191/09 P and C-200/09 P , EU:C:2011:245 , point 66 ), Advocate General Mengozzi referred to the possibility of a producer of a third State operating on its domestic market through a company which i",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "1aec4e388f3add73465d5528f90c2836dcca017f4413f9a3bf208dacae208b3c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~c-478-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-478/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_268"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be recalled that, under the principle of respect for the rights of defence of the parties to an anti-dumping proceeding, those parties should have been placed in a position, during the administrative procedure, in which they could effectively make known their views on the c",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "450d4b254ac857ff17c6ad17a18aa434ad35688b79ea12d13afa77c00dfcbd12"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~c-498-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-498/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-498/24 P,",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "a591bdc725a2288c807ca8db16f88d3f398c6fbe9c4c59f9cd308d415ae5d7d6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~t-249-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-249/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_204"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, the appellants’ argument that, in the cases giving rise to the judgments of 10 March 2009, Interpipe Niko Tube and Interpipe NTRP v Council ( T-249/06 , EU:T:2009:62 ); of 25 June 2015, PT Musim Mas v Council ( T-26/12 , EU:T:2015:437 ); and of 21 February 2024, Sinopec Chongqing SVW Ch",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "9aaa6f266dc73aa985101206236cccb84bf7496a350879412433e79272ca780d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~t-26-12",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-26/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_141",
          "para_143",
          "para_145",
          "para_170",
          "para_198",
          "para_204",
          "para_208",
          "para_212"
        ],
        "excerpt": "More specifically, the General Court took into account only the existence of the agreement between the appellants, which provided for the payment of commission, whereas it is, they argue, apparent from the judgments of 26 October 2016, PT Musim Mas v Council ( C-468/15 P , EU:C:2016:803 ); of 25 Jun",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "562188b8b0107b25c149e84dba100f590a1e3ac498d5c34532b5c7a2b4a6750b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~t-630-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-630/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_23",
          "para_91"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By their appeal, Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ (‘CM’) and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ (‘ÇOTAŞ’) ask the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 May 2024, Çolakoğlu Metalurji and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret v Commission ( T-630/21 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "c10bbbc5217535a38bdaca843e9f935180a179ea2664a50c41189fb00cf8b833"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~t-716-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-716/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_141",
          "para_170"
        ],
        "excerpt": "More specifically, the General Court took into account only the existence of the agreement between the appellants, which provided for the payment of commission, whereas it is, they argue, apparent from the judgments of 26 October 2016, PT Musim Mas v Council ( C-468/15 P , EU:C:2016:803 ); of 25 Jun",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "6368162f76010bc482895df241b45d25492105fcba24c89677599986f65b2ae5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-498-24-p~cites~t-762-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-498-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-762/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_145",
          "para_204"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to the appellants, it does not follow from the judgments of 25 June 2015, PT Musim Mas v Council ( T-26/12 , EU:T:2015:437 ), and of 21 February 2024, Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical and Others v Commission ( T-762/20 , EU:T:2024:113 ), that direct domestic sales of the product under consid",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "27e121a36bc034a85662930f050f332bdfcbf2511c2f0dbc5f4c2345617fe180"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 15,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-498-24-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "1a88ea8e13b2d2923a007657509e71062db751f53488db555ac49785fb3d21a1"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "hash": "sha256:98974ac3f496bc46aeb0b3f65647c6e13298fe32682e4912bef6f45468ad159b",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-05",
  "expires": "2026-10-06T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-05+legal-2026-10-05+2026-10-05T17:44:48",
    "content_hash": "sha256:98974ac3f496bc46aeb0b3f65647c6e13298fe32682e4912bef6f45468ad159b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-05T20:20:52.428Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-498-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}