{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-10-30","fingerprint":"ewai:se:363e28","proof":"sha256:46a173d0cd2c7ebda01fbe875241d0d8b19fcd9e54df9e140a4ad88e2e54c409","jurisdiction":"se","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","object_type":"edge","object_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24","schema_version":"1","schema":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24","judgment":{"id":"eu:c-458-24","text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-458-24"},"siblings":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-458-24","relation":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-458-24","change":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-458-24","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-458-24","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-458-24","status":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-458-24","precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-458-24","element":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-458-24","decision":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-458-24","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-458-24","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-458-24","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-458-24"},"source":"NovaCopilot","precedent_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-458-24","item":{"judgment":"eu:c-458-24","outgoing":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~distinguishes~c-36-17","type":"distinguishes","label_sv":"särskiljer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-36/17","id":"eu:c-36-17","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-36-17"},"paragraph_ids":["para_151","para_152"],"excerpt":"71 Moreover, it follows from the wording of Article 33(1) of Directive 2013/32, and in particular from the clause ‘in addition to cases in which an application is not examined in accordance with [the Dublin III Regulation]’, that that provision clearly distinguishes cases in which an application for","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"8cec2bcf490709743a6647e6d5b86b55fdb569b64aabdc88c2dc659bd156e640"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-185-24","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-185/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_108","para_109","para_110","para_111","para_112","para_114","para_115"],"excerpt":"In that situation, in accordance with the second and third subparagraphs of Article 3(2) of that regulation, the determining Member State becomes the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection if it finds, following examination of the criteria set out in Chap","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"216e1e177818c3908f9657f1209fad38c79cb3158abcf4dbe61ea836f9718026"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-189-24","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-189/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_108","para_109","para_110","para_111","para_112","para_114","para_115"],"excerpt":"In that situation, in accordance with the second and third subparagraphs of Article 3(2) of that regulation, the determining Member State becomes the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection if it finds, following examination of the criteria set out in Chap","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"6caceefab10d8e3fa0d1044875dbfb518de20bb3cf3153ca23b79074b2d21072"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-201-16","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-201/16","id":"eu:c-201-16","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-201-16"},"paragraph_ids":["para_122","para_133"],"excerpt":"56 Those time limits thus testify to the particular importance that the EU legislature has attached to the rapid determination of the Member State responsible for the examination of an application for international protection and to the fact that, having regard to the aim of ensuring effective acces","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"999bd46350dbcc7130246f61a878e5c1ec32e6c73ad84b3503a22c1fee11ff33"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-245-21","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-245/21","id":"eu:c-245-21","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-245-21"},"paragraph_ids":["para_127","para_128","para_129","para_130","para_131","para_132","para_142"],"excerpt":"The EU legislature did not include in that regulation any general provision for such interruption or suspension of that time limit (see, to that effect, judgments of 22 September 2022, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Administrative suspension of the transfer decision) , C-245/21 and C-248/21, EU:C:2022:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"94e01980858d7024739b5f4764e0cb73aca55eb3f4cef41373bc1891df47708c"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-248-21","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-248/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_127","para_128","para_129","para_130","para_131","para_132","para_142"],"excerpt":"The EU legislature did not include in that regulation any general provision for such interruption or suspension of that time limit (see, to that effect, judgments of 22 September 2022, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Administrative suspension of the transfer decision) , C-245/21 and C-248/21, EU:C:2022:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"d841565d30bbf0f8e21f54286fca2a7ab9267db27d23a033ae0bf1a02b382213"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-323-21","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-323/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_127","para_129"],"excerpt":"The EU legislature did not include in that regulation any general provision for such interruption or suspension of that time limit (see, to that effect, judgments of 22 September 2022, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Administrative suspension of the transfer decision) , C-245/21 and C-248/21, EU:C:2022:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"1d2114c73a303354d12b4c7d53d1e753f26fae2a47243216d7088f19bfa839aa"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-325-21","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-325/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_127","para_129"],"excerpt":"The EU legislature did not include in that regulation any general provision for such interruption or suspension of that time limit (see, to that effect, judgments of 22 September 2022, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Administrative suspension of the transfer decision) , C-245/21 and C-248/21, EU:C:2022:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"9377b17350323701ea16bfd53334fa5c353ed87db52c0feaa8713d771043dc05"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-356-15","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-356/15","id":"eu:c-356-15","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-356-15"},"paragraph_ids":["para_139"],"excerpt":"Articles 258 and 259 TFEU provide the appropriate remedies in cases where Member States fail to fulfil their obligations under the FEU Treaty (see, to that effect, judgments of 11 January 1990, Blanguernon , C-38/89, EU:C:1990:11, paragraph 7, and of 11 July 2018, Commission v Belgium , C-356/15, EU","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"612612c2e0cb3fa5d1e788032411568eff5875a6bef41c1a18594ef0acb5a78a"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-38-89","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-38/89","id":"eu:c-38-89","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-38-89"},"paragraph_ids":["para_139"],"excerpt":"Articles 258 and 259 TFEU provide the appropriate remedies in cases where Member States fail to fulfil their obligations under the FEU Treaty (see, to that effect, judgments of 11 January 1990, Blanguernon , C-38/89, EU:C:1990:11, paragraph 7, and of 11 July 2018, Commission v Belgium , C-356/15, EU","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"a02ede614a8b934ef87b21133bebd130f597b7c3fbaa5383f4aecc5a2429b97c"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-392-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-392/22","id":"eu:c-392-22","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-392-22"},"paragraph_ids":["para_109","para_111"],"excerpt":"Only ‘systemic’ flaws, ‘resulting in a risk of inhuman or degrading treatment within the meaning of Article 4 of the [Charter]’, make the transfer of an applicant for international protection to the Member State responsible impossible and require the further examination of the criteria set out in Ch","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"c4440d04939eeb9e5c7c418773fd83ca7806e01c202f180a0828f4aef8ab8f56"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-47-17","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-47/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_133"],"excerpt":"56 Those time limits thus testify to the particular importance that the EU legislature has attached to the rapid determination of the Member State responsible for the examination of an application for international protection and to the fact that, having regard to the aim of ensuring effective acces","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"68ab7179020ddba90a2147a297ff494523fa08de866ec38c4f11af30561769cb"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-48-17","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-48/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_133"],"excerpt":"56 Those time limits thus testify to the particular importance that the EU legislature has attached to the rapid determination of the Member State responsible for the examination of an application for international protection and to the fact that, having regard to the aim of ensuring effective acces","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"3088bc762fda2d3da6dc575d0a95c094cb20ef7002c906a8b39366201e908479"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-556-21","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-556/21","id":"eu:c-556-21","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-556-21"},"paragraph_ids":["para_133"],"excerpt":"56 Those time limits thus testify to the particular importance that the EU legislature has attached to the rapid determination of the Member State responsible for the examination of an application for international protection and to the fact that, having regard to the aim of ensuring effective acces","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"78a0425467c3bff6d8db3ac7436a851cae86e11f1e222de9e9eb80d8e0b9bfd0"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-578-16","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-578/16","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_129"],"excerpt":"K. and Others , C-578/16 PPU, EU:C:2017:127, paragraph 89) or the COVID-19 pandemic (see, to that effect, judgment of 22 September 2022, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Administrative suspension of the transfer decision) , C-245/21 and C-248/21, EU:C:2022:709, paragraph 71).","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"53b539b0ba9e2c61b06e1ba9e3e688efd1d22b551ba6fb79c1abc403bac9c21e"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~follows~c-720-20","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-720/20","id":"eu:c-720-20","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-720-20"},"paragraph_ids":["para_148","para_149"],"excerpt":"69 It follows both from the exhaustiveness of the list in Article 33(2) of Directive 2013/32 and from the fact that the grounds of inadmissibility set out in that list are exemptions that that provision must be interpreted strictly and cannot therefore be applied to a situation which does not corres","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"166ddc819a206e680937c474ddf644746aa806c056d5ff50f7c3bc9f0e0f32a7"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-228-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-228/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_114"],"excerpt":"37 That interpretation is also borne out by the aims of the Dublin III Regulation, which seeks, inter alia, to establish a clear and effective method for determining the Member State responsible and to prevent secondary movements of asylum seekers between Member States (judgments of 30 November 2023","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"9b6d9a1ba7693b85dd1dd5348735ab3f379205f443553a0976b735d9a067b772"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-254-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-254/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_114"],"excerpt":"37 That interpretation is also borne out by the aims of the Dublin III Regulation, which seeks, inter alia, to establish a clear and effective method for determining the Member State responsible and to prevent secondary movements of asylum seekers between Member States (judgments of 30 November 2023","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"e6a149a7cc8a90e22c5800e25224d81b3da0f23d59d201b50ed4c180568ce971"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-297-17","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-297/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_148","para_152"],"excerpt":"In that regard, Article 33(2) of that directive sets out an exhaustive list of the situations in which the Member States may consider an application for international protection to be inadmissible (judgments of 19 March 2019, Ibrahim and Others , C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17, EU:C:2019:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"f3f8987f48970d9a68bd78fa7cfb367b2e2c2c0777eb0a04f38962422b06d3cc"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-297-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-297/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_114"],"excerpt":"37 That interpretation is also borne out by the aims of the Dublin III Regulation, which seeks, inter alia, to establish a clear and effective method for determining the Member State responsible and to prevent secondary movements of asylum seekers between Member States (judgments of 30 November 2023","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"242a2a57b14a5df0ed84e2559506c02af01aa7d74f4d13e927938487375ce883"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-315-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-315/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_114"],"excerpt":"37 That interpretation is also borne out by the aims of the Dublin III Regulation, which seeks, inter alia, to establish a clear and effective method for determining the Member State responsible and to prevent secondary movements of asylum seekers between Member States (judgments of 30 November 2023","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"2902ef858e80deb8322d08ef57816dec449354a2d2e9d17910cbb063de57b02b"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-318-17","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-318/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_148","para_152"],"excerpt":"In that regard, Article 33(2) of that directive sets out an exhaustive list of the situations in which the Member States may consider an application for international protection to be inadmissible (judgments of 19 March 2019, Ibrahim and Others , C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17, EU:C:2019:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"eabac22dfda557a91f586f17d6f8437d9976a4498119dffb71a524e1988da3c4"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-319-17","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-319/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_148","para_152"],"excerpt":"In that regard, Article 33(2) of that directive sets out an exhaustive list of the situations in which the Member States may consider an application for international protection to be inadmissible (judgments of 19 March 2019, Ibrahim and Others , C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17, EU:C:2019:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"3fc13cc364de6296f6f39b6a42f7901e631c62de1de76265f1a6cdefa7ca1922"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-328-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-328/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_114"],"excerpt":"37 That interpretation is also borne out by the aims of the Dublin III Regulation, which seeks, inter alia, to establish a clear and effective method for determining the Member State responsible and to prevent secondary movements of asylum seekers between Member States (judgments of 30 November 2023","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"a5f54e834b60fe96cda62d2285c28849d0ae605c6575f18d7e5f072e2e2cdc63"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-438-17","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-438/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_148","para_152"],"excerpt":"In that regard, Article 33(2) of that directive sets out an exhaustive list of the situations in which the Member States may consider an application for international protection to be inadmissible (judgments of 19 March 2019, Ibrahim and Others , C-297/17, C-318/17, C-319/17 and C-438/17, EU:C:2019:","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"9ea3943ea81a0f80d92fd8059b6b61771d4c88d763db4ac76708c134c09a8224"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-497-20","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-497/20","id":"eu:c-497-20","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-497-20"},"paragraph_ids":["para_140"],"excerpt":"63 Thus, the remedy for a possible infringement of the Dublin III Regulation by the Member State initially designated as responsible under the criteria set out in Chapter III of that regulation, such as that identified by the referring court in the dispute in the main proceedings, would lie in the p","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"c4fadceeb7b966e551054858abbcf331bfa978c7db79db8fa666f1082f044bd1"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-752-18","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-752/18","id":"eu:c-752-18-62018cj0752","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-752-18-62018cj0752"},"paragraph_ids":["para_140"],"excerpt":"63 Thus, the remedy for a possible infringement of the Dublin III Regulation by the Member State initially designated as responsible under the criteria set out in Chapter III of that regulation, such as that identified by the referring court in the dispute in the main proceedings, would lie in the p","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"566a65c89184eb68ae5b76baf3891c2a5f183c199f10f25f6af355d72eec5f1a"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-758-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-758/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_117","para_118"],"excerpt":"To that end, the Court may find it necessary to consider provisions of EU law which the national court has not referred to in its question (see judgments of 20 March 1986, Tissier , 35/85, EU:C:1986:143, paragraph 9, and of 1 August 2025, Alace and Canpelli , C-758/24 and C-759/24, EU:C:2025:591, pa","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"eed7bcb100675c466ec152f93029a380fcdae5894a3aad2d7a6d6085acfceb0b"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-458-24~cites~c-759-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-458-24","to":{"ref":"C-759/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_117","para_118"],"excerpt":"To that end, the Court may find it necessary to consider provisions of EU law which the national court has not referred to in its question (see judgments of 20 March 1986, Tissier , 35/85, EU:C:1986:143, paragraph 9, and of 1 August 2025, Alace and Canpelli , C-758/24 and C-759/24, EU:C:2025:591, pa","decided":"2026-03-05","hash":"638659e2b0c1286bf5018a924e886380a51da37712de624d2f00da3ab1f079ac"}],"incoming":[],"acts":[],"counts":{"outgoing":29,"incoming":0,"acts":0},"follow":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24?follow=5","hash":"c176f6681ed9f89872f49b5392020bad73215ff5a637482f0480a209b596ca35"},"links":{"provisions":null,"case_law":{"precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-458-24","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-458-24","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-458-24","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-458-24"},"compact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24?view=compact","representations":{"sv":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-458-24","en":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-458-24"},"machine_languages":["en","sv"],"ref":"eu:c-458-24"},"watch":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-458-24","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-458-24","risk_changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes","node_state":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-458-24","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-458-24"},"metadata":{"schema":"novacopilot_object_metadata/1","canonical_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","official_source":null,"short_answer":null,"short_answer_status":"not_in_register","hash":"c176f6681ed9f89872f49b5392020bad73215ff5a637482f0480a209b596ca35","schema_version":"1","last_verified_at":null,"verification_status":"not_verified_yet","integrity_check_scope":"stored_content_only"},"hash":"sha256:46a173d0cd2c7ebda01fbe875241d0d8b19fcd9e54df9e140a4ad88e2e54c409","version":"legal-2026-10-30","expires":"2026-11-01T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-10-30+legal-2026-10-30+2026-10-30T22:05:59","content_hash":"sha256:46a173d0cd2c7ebda01fbe875241d0d8b19fcd9e54df9e140a4ad88e2e54c409","revalidate_after":"2026-10-31T02:22:23.543Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24","disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","withheld":{"links.evidence":3},"access":{"status":"partner_key_required","header":"x-partner-key","contact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt","note":"Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."},"access_class":"relationship","access_view":"public","freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-10-31T01:22:24.194Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-458-24","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":7526}}