{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-457-23-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-28",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:915129",
    "proof": "sha256:a69cb41df8f9a31101d2895b9031daf43d5d9689a2ecf9b8d0fc47ce29962e38",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-457-23-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-457-23-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-457-23-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-457-23-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-457-23-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-457-23-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~overrules~c-284-21",
        "type": "overrules",
        "label_sv": "frångår",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-284/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_257",
          "para_259"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, by adopting guidelines, such as those set out in the Temporary Framework, in order to establish the criteria on the basis of which the Commission proposes to assess the compatibility, with the internal market, of aid envisaged by the Member States, and by announcing, by publishing them, tha",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "702b3eb3f9447fbff92aabcd3aaaafe4e6db0ee6e2d2f8bc08c169fe8df91133"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~overrules~c-526-14",
        "type": "overrules",
        "label_sv": "frångår",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-526/14",
          "id": "eu:c-526-14-62014co0526",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-526-14-62014co0526"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_253",
          "para_257"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, by adopting guidelines, such as those set out in the Temporary Framework, in order to establish the criteria on the basis of which the Commission proposes to assess the compatibility, with the internal market, of aid envisaged by the Member States, and by announcing, by publishing them, tha",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "44bccdafaed486c787a2d908a2d0a7520318fb81c12039b82c53c3607dc80d62"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~follows~c-148-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-148/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_267"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By contrast, such a plea must be rejected if, despite the evidence adduced by the applicants, the contested assessment does not appear to be vitiated by any such error (see, to that effect, judgment of 7 May 2020, BTB Holding Investments and Duferco Participations Holding v Commission, C-148/19 P , ",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "5d6c919471a487742e9a8f45e716f8f5109409affff190e790694fc7ab72f443"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~follows~c-320-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-320/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_271"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, the General Court, more generally, cannot substitute its own reasoning for that of the author of the contested act (see, to that effect, judgment of 28 September 2023, Ryanair v Commission, C-320/21 P , EU:C:2023:712 , paragraph 117 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "f14e42ba95c9217e1f865076f5167ee081d19b306c274aadc7376129f6affd2f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~follows~c-333-07",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-333/07",
          "id": "eu:c-333-07",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-333-07"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_255"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that judicial review must, in that regard, be confined to establishing that the rules of procedure and the rules relating to the duty to give reasons have been complied with, verifying that the facts relied on are accurate, and that there has been no manifest error of assessment or misuse",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "1f79485f0fc2de202bf27329f8a1ddcc16c4bc9ca755ab1f380070c751504adf"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~follows~c-588-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-588/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_259"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Accordingly, the Member States retain the right to notify the Commission of proposed State aid which does not meet the requirements established in such guidelines and it may authorise such proposed aid in exceptional circumstances (see, to that effect, judgments of 31 January 2023, Commission v Brae",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "fa499897cca1019b7d7baa3ab8a7c3a5f3e2a6855d9eaf83abbff18e71ca2c98"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-164-03",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-164/03",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_38"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Points 44, 49, 51, 54, 59, 60 to 63, 67 to 70 and 72 of that communication, as amended by the Communication from the Commission of 8 May 2020 (2020/C-164/03, OJ 2020 C 164, p. 3 ) (‘the Temporary Framework’), provided:",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "08cb8d2df4db9719c7bda575afe0df6fa211db896cf68144f4e73241d41189bc"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-204-00",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-204/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards the second part of the fourth ground of appeal, it should be observed, with respect to its admissibility, first, that infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons and the limits of its judicial review are points of law over which the Court of Justice has jurisdicti",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "4d779f1e811f6be01f89083be0d33a9949b89f738d2022a66201d383ba8fcfa1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-205-00",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-205/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards the second part of the fourth ground of appeal, it should be observed, with respect to its admissibility, first, that infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons and the limits of its judicial review are points of law over which the Court of Justice has jurisdicti",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "3cd2c906d21d6ed1e523b00991a03562d31042c562fd99e00f49d4ec75b2e38c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-211-00",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-211/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards the second part of the fourth ground of appeal, it should be observed, with respect to its admissibility, first, that infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons and the limits of its judicial review are points of law over which the Court of Justice has jurisdicti",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "f86f8cf9a0c92928f43c25f37a200c9121248e4491d86ed5949d99a8260260ab"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-213-00",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-213/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards the second part of the fourth ground of appeal, it should be observed, with respect to its admissibility, first, that infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons and the limits of its judicial review are points of law over which the Court of Justice has jurisdicti",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "da576251b7e725fdc0bffcee8af02bb68eef3fbfa5e04a6d0c17c5d5fa629aef"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-214-12",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-214/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_269"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, the European Union judicature must, inter alia, establish not only whether the evidence relied on is factually accurate, reliable and consistent but also whether that evidence contains all the relevant information which must be taken into account in order to assess a complex situation and w",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "be846876efc13b456d0d4b6c2c282f4ea8b1de8c474d5c41dbddf3a599be45a1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-215-12",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-215/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_269"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, the European Union judicature must, inter alia, establish not only whether the evidence relied on is factually accurate, reliable and consistent but also whether that evidence contains all the relevant information which must be taken into account in order to assess a complex situation and w",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "cd316ffbb2681ed4a33945603a917d7a5c556c968af4ce1f76253aa7891a7010"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-217-00",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-217/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards the second part of the fourth ground of appeal, it should be observed, with respect to its admissibility, first, that infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons and the limits of its judicial review are points of law over which the Court of Justice has jurisdicti",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "4988f011fc7b360a4a259b68f4de97b44d9bee12d2690d7ef087e93db16d10a0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-219-00",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-219/00",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards the second part of the fourth ground of appeal, it should be observed, with respect to its admissibility, first, that infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons and the limits of its judicial review are points of law over which the Court of Justice has jurisdicti",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "da9c43eef8cb41768e367da951f1ec7f4a6ecc18d165f2809999a554513290b2"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-223-12",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-223/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_269"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, the European Union judicature must, inter alia, establish not only whether the evidence relied on is factually accurate, reliable and consistent but also whether that evidence contains all the relevant information which must be taken into account in order to assess a complex situation and w",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "cd532d43c73f591d3bc612146730756e9c08a0b8807de170e66586ba7f2af55c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-224-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-224/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As regards the second part of the fourth ground of appeal, it should be observed, with respect to its admissibility, first, that infringement by the General Court of its obligation to state reasons and the limits of its judicial review are points of law over which the Court of Justice has jurisdicti",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "8c0d4dde516bbb6b2a07abc7b97f821847b4babcdb823827bde7031058e4e0b4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-457-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-457/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-457/23 P,",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "cf5c013a5bc465ce7281c9a18bb58efef241f1fc17b21bc6e2cba8f2a2dc9286"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-490-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-490/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_455",
          "para_457"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is not necessary for the reasoning to specify all the relevant facts and points of law, since the question whether the statement of reasons meets the requirements of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU must be assessed with regard not only to its wording but also to its context and to all th",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "b9b864559e1d3bcddff458191750f9f4e79fc3335b64f83b32b560e93fd54243"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~c-59-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-59/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_332"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to review the findings of fact by the General Court extends, inter alia, to the distortion of the facts, namely the substantive inaccuracy of those findings as apparent from the documents in the file, distortion of the evidence, the legal characterisation of ",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "d6f1a3af8a74428c43e7989baa2ad71d2e882061dbedbaaee90ad93ea0c1bc12"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~t-162-10",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-162/10",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_409"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, DLH submits that while the General Court acknowledged that the Commission had broad discretion to assess whether the commitments entered into were sufficient, it disregarded its own case-law arising from the judgment of 13 May 2015, Niki Luftfahrt v Commission ( T-162/10 , EU:T:2015:",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "b988e8e457a62c10fe0877c23fc55407fcec2ca21eab618b1384272f3f49eee0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~t-34-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-34/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_27",
          "para_127",
          "para_133",
          "para_135",
          "para_139",
          "para_141",
          "para_143",
          "para_145",
          "para_147",
          "para_178"
        ],
        "excerpt": "COVID-19) ( T-34/21 and T-87/21 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2023:248 ), by which the General Court annulled Commission Decision C(2020) 4372 final of 25 June 2020 concerning State Aid SA 57153 (2020/N) - Germany - COVID-19 - Aid to Lufthansa, as rectified by Commission Decision C(2021) 9606 fi",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "2d46bab57acf61819180c1df1df19d00153f14351392910b94b121ae04308468"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-457-23-p~cites~t-87-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-457-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-87/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_27",
          "para_129",
          "para_133",
          "para_139",
          "para_145",
          "para_147"
        ],
        "excerpt": "COVID-19) ( T-34/21 and T-87/21 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2023:248 ), by which the General Court annulled Commission Decision C(2020) 4372 final of 25 June 2020 concerning State Aid SA 57153 (2020/N) - Germany - COVID-19 - Aid to Lufthansa, as rectified by Commission Decision C(2021) 9606 fi",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "01d727fbea90e2289ae89ac65176293a7299a79bcbf3aec0889942e62377eb12"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 23,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-457-23-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "4a023f7c5d3f455e6ec89d67decdb7bbc16841e42266a946e0f1510e09dc8f6a"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-457-23-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-457-23-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-457-23-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-457-23-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-457-23-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-457-23-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-457-23-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-457-23-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-457-23-p",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-457-23-p",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "node_state": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-457-23-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-457-23-p"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-457-23-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "4a023f7c5d3f455e6ec89d67decdb7bbc16841e42266a946e0f1510e09dc8f6a",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:a69cb41df8f9a31101d2895b9031daf43d5d9689a2ecf9b8d0fc47ce29962e38",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-28",
  "expires": "2026-10-30T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-28+legal-2026-10-28+2026-10-28T10:10:35",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a69cb41df8f9a31101d2895b9031daf43d5d9689a2ecf9b8d0fc47ce29962e38",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-29T09:45:58.382Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-457-23-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}