{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-447-24",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-447-24)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:24f33b",
    "proof": "sha256:4894ce6e150165c923d5de3b9f480af047da2c0a0c62ad954c868b92e089aa25",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-447-24",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-447-24",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-447-24"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-447-24",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-447-24",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-447-24",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-447-24",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-447-24",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-447-24",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-447-24",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-447-24",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-447-24",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-447-24",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-447-24",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-447-24"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-447-24",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-447-24",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-221-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-221/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_181"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, where there is divergence between the various language versions of a European Union text, the provision in question must be interpreted by reference to the context and purpose of the rules of which it forms part (see, to that effect, judgment of 23 October 2025, Naturvårdsverket (Waste treatme",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "f08343fe8876eeaac15ed00719d3322ef6a77be02e61bc9aa9ea08dab95a62f9"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-222-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-222/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_181"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, where there is divergence between the various language versions of a European Union text, the provision in question must be interpreted by reference to the context and purpose of the rules of which it forms part (see, to that effect, judgment of 23 October 2025, Naturvårdsverket (Waste treatme",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "086a244a599a2df3f4bc3b27352972609b94f889213add6967149b1b7c505240"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-398-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-398/22",
          "id": "eu:c-398-22",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-398-22"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_156",
          "para_157",
          "para_204",
          "para_205"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, the principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law requires that the whole body of domestic law be taken into consideration and that the interpretative methods recognised by domestic law be applied, with a view to ensuring that the framework decision concerned is ful",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "17f901f21916832dffad13459619782f92502c17b8c40baa0b683000c300bf3f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-400-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-400/23",
          "id": "eu:c-400-23-62023cj0400",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-400-23-62023cj0400"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_185"
        ],
        "excerpt": "75 That interpretation is supported by the provisions of Directive 2016/343, which lays down the minimum rules concerning certain aspects of criminal proceedings, including the ‘right to be present at the trial’, in particular Article 8(2) thereof, which is a relevant contextual element for the inte",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "8ee7665e6b2279595968044cef288dac9fcb6aa473d1eee8d485a8e03fb0eaec"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-420-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-420/20",
          "id": "eu:c-420-20-62020cj0420",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-420-20-62020cj0420"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_187"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Relying, inter alia, on recital 36 of that directive, the Court has stated that the condition, set out both in points (a) and (b) of Article 8(2) thereof, under which the person concerned must be informed of his or her trial, requires that the person concerned is informed of the scheduled date of th",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "9d3e133aa9f3c37a58b6ac8afa64eae492e8dce4049e803f0bd23387c5ef617a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-489-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-489/23",
          "id": "eu:c-489-23-62023cj0489",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-489-23-62023cj0489"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_178"
        ],
        "excerpt": "68 In that regard, it should be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, it is necessary, in order to interpret a provision of EU law, to consider not only its wording, but also its context and the objectives pursued by the rules of which it is part (judgments of 17 November 1983, Merck , ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "d473042e51ef9f4b8c415bdbcde0a85998d45c679a7fc098a5fcf5b838e0b380"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-514-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-514/21",
          "id": "eu:c-514-21",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-514-21"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_168",
          "para_189",
          "para_199",
          "para_201"
        ],
        "excerpt": "79 As is expressly apparent from Article 1 of Framework Decision 2009/299, read in the light of recitals 1 and 15 thereof, Article 9(1)(i) seeks, setting out the definition of the common grounds for enforcement of a sentencing judgment despite the failure of the person concerned to attend his or her",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "7505d266867e2ce95337f6c2b11c71c116964ce661129cb1da5eeac01e7f8cce"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~follows~c-515-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-515/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_168",
          "para_189",
          "para_199",
          "para_201"
        ],
        "excerpt": "79 As is expressly apparent from Article 1 of Framework Decision 2009/299, read in the light of recitals 1 and 15 thereof, Article 9(1)(i) seeks, setting out the definition of the common grounds for enforcement of a sentencing judgment despite the failure of the person concerned to attend his or her",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "66f4a4810741cf1481c3c82a9ac05afb211de76e8f95081503fef777ec50a687"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-108-16",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-108/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_131",
          "para_167",
          "para_170",
          "para_177"
        ],
        "excerpt": "29 The referring court is inclined to take the view that an answer in the negative to the question referred follows from the judgments of 24 May 2016, Dworzecki (C-108/16 PPU, EU:C:2016:346), and of 21 December 2023, Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin (Conviction in absentia) (C-397/22, EU:C:2023:1030",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "eed3ef9053b5fcc25cdb58930a09cfeb3e374bfebc4e7b3647f236b6af8e3245"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-135-25",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-135/25",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_172"
        ],
        "excerpt": "63 The sending, by the competent authority of the issuing Member State, of that summons to the address of the firm of the legal counsellor for the person concerned is tantamount to informing the person concerned himself or herself, the latter being deemed, in that situation, to have received the sum",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "2d2a9ba4fd89619b157386df0ae0ff31aa2dfc9e03b4bf3c02a4cc2ac2eb6678"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-270-17",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-270/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_130"
        ],
        "excerpt": "28 In that regard, that court considers that the concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’ in Article 9(1)(i) of Framework Decision 2008/909 must be understood in the same way as the identical concept in Article 4a of Framework Decision 2002/584, which the Court has previously interpreted in the ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "869c169b79923aa70486b64e313ec1885c2ac75e5cabacda40e54cedd7d5efd6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-305-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-305/22",
          "id": "eu:c-305-22-62022cj0305",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-305-22-62022cj0305"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_151"
        ],
        "excerpt": "(Enforcement of a sentence further to an EAW) , C-305/22, EU:C:2025:665, paragraph 45 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "e6fbeb114d1ca79cb01d83b41ab0c6c4133b4e52384d72fe3fc2ccb115aff74f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-349-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-349/24",
          "id": "eu:c-349-24-62024cj0349",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-349-24-62024cj0349"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_162"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it is for the Court to extract from all the information provided by the national court, in particular from the grounds of the order for reference, the points of EU law which require interpretation, having regard to the subject matter of the dispute (judgment of 5 June 2025, Nuratau ,",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "ff7466b439972536759791cbfba43a8378e2390af60831c4c90f6b10c43c7d46"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-396-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-396/22",
          "id": "eu:c-396-22",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-396-22"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_198"
        ],
        "excerpt": "87 It is apparent from the very wording of Article 9(1)(i), in particular the statement that the executing judicial authority ‘may’ refuse to recognise and enforce the sentencing judgment concerned, that the competent authority of the executing Member State has the right to refuse to recognise and e",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "56836fd7fd6debbfb74e3fb13153c41ac159e8b90d246f9b03dbcdd9c764d75d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-397-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-397/22",
          "id": "eu:c-397-22",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-397-22"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_130",
          "para_131",
          "para_140",
          "para_170"
        ],
        "excerpt": "28 In that regard, that court considers that the concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’ in Article 9(1)(i) of Framework Decision 2008/909 must be understood in the same way as the identical concept in Article 4a of Framework Decision 2002/584, which the Court has previously interpreted in the ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "3a027fd0bf349a09fd385e55c69dc580ca7a2e94b24ab7433122a7e2e83f0e96"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-399-11",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-399/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_168"
        ],
        "excerpt": "59 In each of the situations referred to in those points, the recognition and enforcement of a sentencing judgment do not infringe the rights of the defence of the person concerned or the right to an effective judicial remedy and to a fair trial, as enshrined in Article 47 and Article 48(2) of the C",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "6e4213c340aadb635f22caf84011051b394879bb0e93e849a0e87f781be91807"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-447-24~cites~c-819-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-447-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-819/21",
          "id": "eu:c-819-21",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-819-21"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_154"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That authority may, in principle, refuse to give effect to such a request only on the grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement exhaustively listed in Article 9 of Framework Decision 2008/909 (judgment of 9 November 2023, Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen , C-819/21, EU:C:2023:841, paragraph 20).",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "967f5c3841d4159ad20b9dbff1777f6e21a3a3d806d82842de4199b76fb59dcb"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-321-25~follows~c-447-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-321-25",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-321-25",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_153"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, where there is divergence between the various language versions of an EU legislative text, the provision in question must be interpreted by reference to the purpose and general scheme of the rules of which it forms part (see, to that effect, judgments of 27 October 1977, Bouchereau , 30/77, EU"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-95-24~follows~c-447-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-95-24",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-95-24",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_225",
          "para_263",
          "para_265",
          "para_267",
          "para_324"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that the case-law concerning Article 4a(1) applies to Article 9(1)(i), as regards the concepts common to those two provisions (see, to that effect, the judgment delivered today, Höldermann , C-447/24, paragraphs 50 and 51)."
      }
    ],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 17,
      "incoming": 2,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-447-24?follow=5",
    "hash": "6302d8d59f23c48c1cf3d13d20a02190eb4a6da80dfe2b8c36350c061ac464bc"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-447-24",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-447-24",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-447-24",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-447-24"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-447-24?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-447-24",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-447-24"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-447-24"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-447-24",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-447-24",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-447-24"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-447-24",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "6302d8d59f23c48c1cf3d13d20a02190eb4a6da80dfe2b8c36350c061ac464bc",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:4894ce6e150165c923d5de3b9f480af047da2c0a0c62ad954c868b92e089aa25",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
  "expires": "2026-10-27T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-25+legal-2026-10-25+2026-10-25T13:37:31",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4894ce6e150165c923d5de3b9f480af047da2c0a0c62ad954c868b92e089aa25",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-26T07:04:59.251Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-447-24",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}