{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-440-25",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-440-25)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:8180c9",
    "proof": "sha256:59e7ba22ffeafbbece078617ac128b85bbc9070ecfff06f79a2c5573e11f4410",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-440-25",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-440-25",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-440-25"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-440-25",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-440-25",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-440-25",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-440-25",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-440-25",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-440-25",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-440-25",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-440-25",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-440-25",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-440-25",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-440-25",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-440-25"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-440-25",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-440-25",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-151-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-151/22",
          "id": "eu:c-151-22",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-151-22"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_155",
          "para_157"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That determination must be based solely on a specific evaluation of the facts and circumstances, in accordance with the rules laid down in particular by Article 4(3) to (5) of that directive (see, to that effect, judgment of 21 September 2023, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Political o",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "abdd9a4453802a6cb0950cd24ca396e1481312ba47ea86999c6cd30cbda96819"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-406-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-406/22",
          "id": "eu:c-406-22",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-406-22"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_131"
        ],
        "excerpt": "50 The power of such a court or tribunal to take into consideration new evidence on which that authority has not taken a decision is thus consistent with the purpose of Directive 2013/32, which seeks in particular, as is apparent inter alia from recital 18 thereof, to ensure that applications for in",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "9ed83c191399c9a1a8250e6b1d54da5fbf4017c484e97c49314ae48575ef0170"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-556-17",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-556/17",
          "id": "eu:c-556-17-62017cj0556",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-556-17-62017cj0556"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_136",
          "para_140",
          "para_141"
        ],
        "excerpt": "59 Second, it is true that, in accordance with the case-law of the Court, Article 46(3) of Directive 2013/32 only concerns the examination of the appeal brought and does not therefore govern what happens after any annulment of the decision under appeal (judgment of 29 July 2019, Torubarov , C-556/17",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "235b38ccd1119d176714acab573603635780b11f4cb0461cee580dc0e76b400f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-569-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-569/16",
          "id": "eu:c-569-16",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-569-16"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_143",
          "para_144"
        ],
        "excerpt": "62 In that regard, it should be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, when national courts apply domestic law, they are bound to interpret it, so far as possible, in the light of the wording and the purpose of the directive concerned in order to achieve the result sought by the directiv",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "e597123abbc24235150cb18df5fea563d75a7828ccd21dc6e0459aa72bd457d5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-570-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-570/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_143",
          "para_144"
        ],
        "excerpt": "62 In that regard, it should be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, when national courts apply domestic law, they are bound to interpret it, so far as possible, in the light of the wording and the purpose of the directive concerned in order to achieve the result sought by the directiv",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "0042fba0dbbba51b67300cab6e6e9a8e7c728352664ffe08fa59187b0986586e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-585-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-585/16",
          "id": "eu:c-585-16",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-585-16"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_116",
          "para_118",
          "para_121",
          "para_122",
          "para_123",
          "para_124",
          "para_125",
          "para_131",
          "para_132"
        ],
        "excerpt": "50 The power of such a court or tribunal to take into consideration new evidence on which that authority has not taken a decision is thus consistent with the purpose of Directive 2013/32, which seeks in particular, as is apparent inter alia from recital 18 thereof, to ensure that applications for in",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "c3d0bf9ce65fca49791e7b8be5531fbd232cfc034cbe121ae307ecae7a151ce0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-608-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-608/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_159"
        ],
        "excerpt": "77 In the second place, it should be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, Directive 2011/95 must be interpreted not only in the light of its general scheme and purpose, but also in a manner consistent with the Geneva Convention - which, as set out in recital 4 of that directive, consti",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "57cea5f340b1b076eb8b78dcae3f69e66d55bdd1cce009b2d0f2f9259763f75e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~follows~c-609-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-609/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_159"
        ],
        "excerpt": "77 In the second place, it should be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, Directive 2011/95 must be interpreted not only in the light of its general scheme and purpose, but also in a manner consistent with the Geneva Convention - which, as set out in recital 4 of that directive, consti",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "c7d5d2e19651ae92469ab53a3be1f4b27ec5f22580ef7e58c12e0cb3fab7af42"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-175-08",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-175/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_154"
        ],
        "excerpt": "72 Regarding the assessment of the question whether an applicant for international protection has a well-founded fear of being persecuted, the Court has emphasised that such an assessment must be carried out with vigilance and care, as what are at issue are questions relating to the integrity of the",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "c332394c001e67d1866f4b3776b16bbc10a4829cba0b3112e9b57a06ce537096"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-176-08",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-176/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_154"
        ],
        "excerpt": "72 Regarding the assessment of the question whether an applicant for international protection has a well-founded fear of being persecuted, the Court has emphasised that such an assessment must be carried out with vigilance and care, as what are at issue are questions relating to the integrity of the",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "ff10448201a2e8d9e495ea4ce2dd499133d9c0fb775b3ebf570831829f55c632"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-178-08",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-178/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_154"
        ],
        "excerpt": "72 Regarding the assessment of the question whether an applicant for international protection has a well-founded fear of being persecuted, the Court has emphasised that such an assessment must be carried out with vigilance and care, as what are at issue are questions relating to the integrity of the",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "b46f20399f53b184909ff91de2a695034a6c93509934569c6bc9eb318e4849f4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-179-08",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-179/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_154"
        ],
        "excerpt": "72 Regarding the assessment of the question whether an applicant for international protection has a well-founded fear of being persecuted, the Court has emphasised that such an assessment must be carried out with vigilance and care, as what are at issue are questions relating to the integrity of the",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "98f079f3ccaef8e2dfa664f5b4ed7b58649b1b27de655572ff3bbe19f0386648"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-277-11",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-277/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_119"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the course of the second stage, it must carry out a legal appraisal of that evidence, which entails deciding whether, in the light of the specific facts of a given case, the substantive conditions for the grant of international protection are satisfied (see, by analogy, judgment of 22 November 20",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "5bfea77fce3e59eef56322b2f0823ff5f67b7e337cc858b788380237dfae4756"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-283-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-283/24",
          "id": "eu:c-283-24",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-283-24"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_146"
        ],
        "excerpt": "65 However, if such a consistent interpretation were to prove impossible, the Court has emphasised the imperative of the court with jurisdiction to set aside, with a view to applying EU law, national legislative provisions that might prevent EU rules which have direct effect, such as Article 46(3) o",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "3e8d36b12152694f975494d01895823eca9a681ceb8b503f38a5d9848e1c3aa4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-414-16",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-414/16",
          "id": "eu:c-414-16",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-414-16"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_145"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Consequently, a national court cannot, inter alia, validly consider that it is impossible for it to interpret a provision of national law in conformity with EU law merely because that provision has consistently been interpreted in a manner that is incompatible with EU law (judgment of 17 April 2018,",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "11042071a3515aaac9fa7542dee250b18ee328c7b78b1d47e0845e58cc040bec"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-517-17",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-517/17",
          "id": "eu:c-517-17",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-517-17"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_116",
          "para_118"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The procedure before a determining authority is governed by the provisions of Chapter III of Directive 2013/32, entitled ‘Procedures at first instance’, while the procedure before a court or tribunal must comply with the rules laid down in Chapter V thereof, entitled ‘Appeals procedures’, which is m",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "26d29ce08fd2836e3de9b306d809de7468d6e5115d902946b959573679013657"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-621-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-621/21",
          "id": "eu:c-621-21",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-621-21"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_160"
        ],
        "excerpt": "78 In that context, in the light of the role conferred on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (HCR) by the Geneva Convention, the documents issued by the HCR are particularly relevant (judgment of 16 January 2024, Intervyuirasht organ na DAB pri MS (Women victims of domestic violence) ",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "3bc76bfc4d38be1188c3de8d53d84c53557fbb4835e02cbb1b45c42dd8b34bfb"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-646-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-646/21",
          "id": "eu:c-646-21",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-646-21"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_86"
        ],
        "excerpt": "14 The referring court examined the action at a hearing held on 26 March 2024, and then reopened the investigation in anticipation of the delivery of the judgment of 11 June 2024, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Women identifying with the value of gender equality) (C-646/21, EU:C:2024:4",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "328d0a1ff838e92efaf06303fa57f3d4cd28948bf4fa120e17fd523225379743"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-758-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-758/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_106",
          "para_121",
          "para_122",
          "para_123",
          "para_125"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To that end, the Court may deem it necessary to consider provisions of EU law to which the national court has not referred in the text of its questions (see judgments of 20 March 1986, Tissier , 35/85, EU:C:1986:143, paragraph 9, and of 1 August 2025, Alace and Canpelli , C-758/24 and C-759/24, EU:C",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "0ffd5686eeb09698088c05a856a863ffeec4a994f885feaf8f37118a29be0ea8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-440-25~cites~c-759-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-440-25",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-759/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_106",
          "para_121",
          "para_122",
          "para_123",
          "para_125"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To that end, the Court may deem it necessary to consider provisions of EU law to which the national court has not referred in the text of its questions (see judgments of 20 March 1986, Tissier , 35/85, EU:C:1986:143, paragraph 9, and of 1 August 2025, Alace and Canpelli , C-758/24 and C-759/24, EU:C",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "36851a26f8da0005da79205ebae07f3ddef68d4638cd91e79b83181710129850"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 20,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-440-25?follow=5",
    "hash": "4d5c0bd6a749d19756d790ea819ce32fddc6564e344f87c8683be685e1054021"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-440-25",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-440-25",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-440-25",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-440-25"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-440-25?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-440-25",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-440-25"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-440-25"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-440-25",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-440-25",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-440-25"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-440-25",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "4d5c0bd6a749d19756d790ea819ce32fddc6564e344f87c8683be685e1054021",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:59e7ba22ffeafbbece078617ac128b85bbc9070ecfff06f79a2c5573e11f4410",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
  "expires": "2026-10-27T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-25+legal-2026-10-25+2026-10-25T13:37:31",
    "content_hash": "sha256:59e7ba22ffeafbbece078617ac128b85bbc9070ecfff06f79a2c5573e11f4410",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-26T12:09:57.664Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-440-25",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}