{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-343-23-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-28",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:9b5587",
    "proof": "sha256:7ac0f5e19f57447fb7e8ac1f50d8f8430a76dbedbda7d998d5096367a1bf8269",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-343-23-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-343-23-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-343-23-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-343-23-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-343-23-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-343-23-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~follows~c-446-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-446/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_232"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In so far as the appellant alleges that the General Court erred in law in finding that the EEAS had not acted in breach of its duty to have regard for the welfare of officials, it should be noted that that duty constitutes, in accordance with settled case-law, a concept reflecting the balance of rec",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "d713d0d9d2e9aaae4744d7dc5e510b7f248193ed81f5036d1b34fc108b877712"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~follows~c-615-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-615/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_139"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that context, it should be noted that it is apparent from the case-law of the Court of Justice that where there is sufficient prima facie evidence of the allegations made in a request for assistance, the administration is required to open an administrative investigation in order to ascertain the ",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "a9b60c3a0dbe537daf0cb2e9ed816283e9007e1b930e1719e6f8892078d69b24"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~follows~c-875-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-875/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_232",
          "para_253",
          "para_255"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In so far as the appellant alleges that the General Court erred in law in finding that the EEAS had not acted in breach of its duty to have regard for the welfare of officials, it should be noted that that duty constitutes, in accordance with settled case-law, a concept reflecting the balance of rec",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "d0d4889c0bddf760510e2723acd3f493114fd9263b9b2a57ff564fea99f57dcd"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~follows~t-507-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-507/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_43",
          "para_67"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By letter of 25 November 2021, signed by … F, the EEAS formally informed the [appellant] of the decision of the appointing authority to promote him to grade AD 14, step 1, with retroactive effect from 1 January 2018 under Article 266(1) TFEU and pursuant to the order of 12 February 2021, Colombani v",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "ad5548cf735b77359eef40e4cca14c49f02163dd20295b7ad21f580b79b186c6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-130-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-130/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_183"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To that end, it is necessary to establish that the General Court manifestly exceeded the limits of a reasonable assessment of the said document, in particular by reading it in a manner contrary to its wording (judgments of 25 February 2021, Dalli v Commission, C-615/19 P , EU:C:2021:133 , paragraph ",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "e0ede615180c1b9209b306162874e1d7b1554bb9e2e117ce99d98c953e19859d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-136-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-136/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_191"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The appraisal of those facts and the assessment of that evidence do not, save where the facts or evidence are distorted, constitute a point of law which is subject, as such, to review by the Court of Justice on appeal (judgments of 21 September 2023, ChinaChamber of Commerce for Import and Export of",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "b6954df4ce7c9fe137fa7efaf18d4627352665a660a994e42618ddbde0cff5ce"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-136-92",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-136/92",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_272"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In an appeal, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice is confined to review of the findings of law on the pleas and arguments debated before the General Court (see judgments of 1 June 1994, Commission v Brazzelli Lualdi and Others, C-136/92 P , EU:C:1994:211 , paragraph 59 ; of 11 September 2019, H",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "f984efc272a762b0089891bfc9b5bd09d68417f0d76876f4f37ba9f5433143f7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-299-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-299/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_143"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Second, in order to fall within that concept, such physical behaviour, spoken or written language, gestures or other acts must have the effect of undermining the personality, dignity or physical or psychological integrity of a person (judgments of 12 November 2020, Pethke v EUIPO, C-382/19 P , EU:C:",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "460ededef60123ec9ad7fc4ee5cec704b9890a153e7a0f3532c4a6de936ae5eb"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-32-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-32/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_272"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In an appeal, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice is confined to review of the findings of law on the pleas and arguments debated before the General Court (see judgments of 1 June 1994, Commission v Brazzelli Lualdi and Others, C-136/92 P , EU:C:1994:211 , paragraph 59 ; of 11 September 2019, H",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "a7863c54feb046580a6d748009a07a75441beed8a986e740ff1d1fa590873bb1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-343-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-343/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-343/23 P,",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "2f3a7aefa2a84a39311de5bfb0178e47b83e402f8e8c001b3c46695180c17363"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-382-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-382/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_143"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Second, in order to fall within that concept, such physical behaviour, spoken or written language, gestures or other acts must have the effect of undermining the personality, dignity or physical or psychological integrity of a person (judgments of 12 November 2020, Pethke v EUIPO, C-382/19 P , EU:C:",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "bf1bc134ddd0d549b71627159665a60863990be62d731d6b252b8c393dc4a861"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-45-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-45/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_255"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The Court has also held that an appeal lacking any coherent structure which simply makes general statements and contains no specific indications as to the points of the decision under appeal which may be vitiated by an error of law must be dismissed as clearly inadmissible (judgments of 4 October 20",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "b4065369edea032213cfbfbfc9667b1d87da9e536700476e2a34e3992fb4e3df"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-478-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-478/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_191"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The appraisal of those facts and the assessment of that evidence do not, save where the facts or evidence are distorted, constitute a point of law which is subject, as such, to review by the Court of Justice on appeal (judgments of 21 September 2023, ChinaChamber of Commerce for Import and Export of",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "6f42c56579400fe8b97f848a3382304e84655f8e7704ec532ecb130786417443"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-540-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-540/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_272"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In an appeal, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice is confined to review of the findings of law on the pleas and arguments debated before the General Court (see judgments of 1 June 1994, Commission v Brazzelli Lualdi and Others, C-136/92 P , EU:C:1994:211 , paragraph 59 ; of 11 September 2019, H",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "0ba90a5b3069f389eb76e6b62173829dc91e96a4ee3b2954fe7ca2b3d1c6ccb3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-595-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-595/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_51"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By judgment of 6 July 2022, Colombani v EEAS ( T-129/21 , … EU:T:2022:424 ), the General Court dismissed that action. [The appellant brought an appeal against that judgment of the General Court, which the Court of Justice dismissed by judgment of 16 November 2023, Colombani v EEAS ( C-595/22 P , EU:",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "8afb1eddb5d479a9135d1fc43da4204f094b93d444871521b56b74c38f0c1873"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-615-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-615/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_183"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To that end, it is necessary to establish that the General Court manifestly exceeded the limits of a reasonable assessment of the said document, in particular by reading it in a manner contrary to its wording (judgments of 25 February 2021, Dalli v Commission, C-615/19 P , EU:C:2021:133 , paragraph ",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "dc0cb56ede40c8fd038ec19f4afc31d95f2104d42250d9bc158ba273672ce822"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-638-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-638/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_253"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It must be recalled that it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indic",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "09a181885eb7b03691dbcd3538118c3e90ee319b239d9108e59789cc5f5b3746"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~c-640-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-640/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_183"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To that end, it is necessary to establish that the General Court manifestly exceeded the limits of a reasonable assessment of the said document, in particular by reading it in a manner contrary to its wording (judgments of 25 February 2021, Dalli v Commission, C-615/19 P , EU:C:2021:133 , paragraph ",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "14c9c9b65a663b98ba55d9cb102f85a54473153cf3cb82ec5204c4f9958b210a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~t-113-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-113/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_21"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By his appeal, Mr Jean-Marc Colombani seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 22 March 2023, Colombani v EEAS ( T-113/22 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2023:154 ), by which the General Court dismissed his action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, ann",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "2cf958bec5dce137ad0f8558b610e8d092d1c08b1c376b0d2e2531728f6bcd4b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~t-129-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-129/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_51"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By judgment of 6 July 2022, Colombani v EEAS ( T-129/21 , … EU:T:2022:424 ), the General Court dismissed that action. [The appellant brought an appeal against that judgment of the General Court, which the Court of Justice dismissed by judgment of 16 November 2023, Colombani v EEAS ( C-595/22 P , EU:",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "c5e55d3fe67618347a89ddfc5f0a009ad4b2d37a8e66cd2b82157b24bc4fa56d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~t-299-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-299/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_128"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In those circumstances, relying on paragraphs 126 and 127 of the judgment of 30 March 2022, KF v EIB ( T-299/20 , EU:T:2022:171 ), the appellant complains that the General Court failed to take account of the fact that harassment may be carried out by ‘… several persons, belonging to the same institu",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "ed429952fa07d30377566d2a29ef7f1667a98c77f5dee5be862bbe1a19cc0515"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-343-23-p~cites~t-372-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-343-23-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-372/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_41",
          "para_43"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By judgment of 10 October 2019, Colombani v EEAS ( T-372/18 , … EU:T:2019:734 ), the General Court annulled that decision on the ground that the general implementing provisions applied by the EEAS to the 2017 promotion exercise were unlawful in so far as they did not permit a comparative and objecti",
        "decided": "2026-04-16",
        "hash": "f0143aebcf22188e8bdeeb40feb8e56388275fa6a21eb84f683823b19e621728"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 22,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-343-23-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "174ca0c681b3b3c7481abd14195cdf973744eca6d9914382c8b38fb369e20344"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-343-23-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-343-23-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-343-23-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-343-23-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-343-23-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-343-23-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-343-23-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-343-23-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-343-23-p",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-343-23-p",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "node_state": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-343-23-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-343-23-p"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-343-23-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "174ca0c681b3b3c7481abd14195cdf973744eca6d9914382c8b38fb369e20344",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:7ac0f5e19f57447fb7e8ac1f50d8f8430a76dbedbda7d998d5096367a1bf8269",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-28",
  "expires": "2026-10-30T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-28+legal-2026-10-28+2026-10-28T10:10:35",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7ac0f5e19f57447fb7e8ac1f50d8f8430a76dbedbda7d998d5096367a1bf8269",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-29T05:58:09.831Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-343-23-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}