{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-319-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-15",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:bf520f",
    "proof": "sha256:79f6d631bdebe7676f8d7a2b23b48f541e3de994b4154831175c2cfc02c46963",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-319-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-319-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-319-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-319-24-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-319-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-319-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-319-24-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-191-09",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-191/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_438"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Conversely, where the Commission considers that it is appropriate to apply a downward adjustment of the export price, it is the responsibility of that institution to adduce at the very least consistent evidence showing that that adjustment is justified (see, to that effect, judgment of 16 February 2",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "b26878765317696991485bc357910884b23b6d18d6715efb8282829152d26ab7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-200-09",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-200/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_438"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Conversely, where the Commission considers that it is appropriate to apply a downward adjustment of the export price, it is the responsibility of that institution to adduce at the very least consistent evidence showing that that adjustment is justified (see, to that effect, judgment of 16 February 2",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "da6cf8546d5afa40ddbf26912f89e646ef6672c9f1f406306da3ecbc45efe67b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-21-13",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-21/13",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_319"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Any other approach would risk undermining the efficiency of EU trade defence measures each time the EU institutions are faced with non-cooperation in the context of an anti-dumping investigation (see, to that effect, judgment of 4 September 2014, Simon, Evers & Co., C-21/13 , EU:C:2014:2154 , paragr",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "0e8512a9da1e96d7c52a45ccf9ca2f468c6d0e6d76a0fe548bec8a3d7671d3a4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-260-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-260/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_289",
          "para_293",
          "para_295"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Therefore, when the Commission is investigating whether there is dumping and injury, it must, as a matter of priority, seek to obtain relevant information on the basis of voluntary cooperation on the part of the interested parties (see, to that effect, judgment of 12 May 2022, Commission v Hansol Pa",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "04fe25a616b5ccb9552b85c1ca37f2073db74ae681da63618289db33a86f28f5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-341-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-341/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, the lawfulness of a Commission decision is to be assessed in the light of the information available to that institution when the decision was adopted (see, to that effect, judgment of 1 July 2008, Chronopost and La Poste v UFEX and Others, C-341/06 P and C-342/06 P , E",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "5f4f51740713ae50dfcb2001183da7e378b33b2d9a08facdab434b11c422fc92"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-342-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-342/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, the lawfulness of a Commission decision is to be assessed in the light of the information available to that institution when the decision was adopted (see, to that effect, judgment of 1 July 2008, Chronopost and La Poste v UFEX and Others, C-341/06 P and C-342/06 P , E",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "eeee08d47bf0be90a02c844dfd5dc289b54b5fac935cf6c45d1c74b60f4417c3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-363-17",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-363/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_719"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It should also be recalled that it follows from settled case-law that the obligation to state reasons does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case and that the reasoning may be implicit on ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "e91d2ca9d11a4263e1e7f6476e02a482d91eeef8ad15f19e987ac3a12126e1d3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-468-15",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-468/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_172",
          "para_395",
          "para_496",
          "para_498",
          "para_543",
          "para_563",
          "para_595",
          "para_605"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Indeed, with regard to any adjustment referred to in Article 2(10) of the basic regulation, the same principle - enshrined in the case-law of the Court - applies, namely that, if a party claims adjustments under that provision in order to ensure comparability between the normal value and the export ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "92d2abfc8a29cfb702b218c76774db6c8cbc673b9469e9bd9a916c729f2b8402"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-666-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-666/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_395",
          "para_423"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Indeed, with regard to any adjustment referred to in Article 2(10) of the basic regulation, the same principle - enshrined in the case-law of the Court - applies, namely that, if a party claims adjustments under that provision in order to ensure comparability between the normal value and the export ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "bf62d36f704997ead2f0ed8ce57de3ded02e47263ab90e324d0c2f7336c96989"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-79-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-79/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_299",
          "para_430"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Next, given that Article 18 of the basic regulation contains provisions corresponding to those of Article 6.8 of the anti-dumping agreement and Annex II to that agreement, Article 18 must be interpreted, as far as possible, in a manner consistent with those provisions of that agreement, having regar",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "2d8bba982b8d27e1584d19694d324da884839f4ccaa9927eb787006e37a522e0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-81-10",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-81/10",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_677"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Lastly, as regards the claim made by the undertakings in the Sinopec Group that the General Court did not confine itself to examining the legality of the regulation at issue since it corrected the errors of law made by the Commission as regards the classification of the adjustment in question, it mu",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "3011a3d1fae66ffd4a0c0dd57526a83efb317d647b6c5584470858b8c929a5dd"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~follows~c-891-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-891/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_301",
          "para_305",
          "para_309",
          "para_311",
          "para_756"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, for the purposes of interpreting and applying the provisions of the basic regulation, the Courts of the European Union must, as far as possible, take account of the interpretation of the corresponding provisions of the anti-dumping agreement by the WTO dispute settlement bodies (see, to",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "f6ecf2882976999aaf517acf8d5571b5028146dd002c1a2103ab7318dd8b8e6b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~cites~c-268-94",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-268/94",
          "id": "eu:c-268-94",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-268-94"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_675"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The Commission’s error, as identified by the General Court, therefore has no bearing on the validity of the regulation at issue, inasmuch as that error had no decisive effect on the Commission’s decision that an upward adjustment of the normal value by the amount of the non-refundable VAT was necess",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "f41268d7bda3811d74b0d4fc098b37217817c8ac06ff7ba440609569a6fc3277"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~cites~c-319-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-319/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_49"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-319/24 P,",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "c783e6161c3e4398aa2bf20a880e4fc2a9cb2e4f0438b96b1ab848778fc06525"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~cites~c-413-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-413/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_529"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the first place, it must be recalled that, as is apparent from the case-law of the Court of Justice, the question whether the General Court applied the correct legal standard when examining the evidence is a question of law, which is amenable, as such, to judicial review on appeal (judgment of 10",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "ba2513c7bc27e8d3ba8883f1b4e96aabf1628071daab3a39e33a9f27ef49c27f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~cites~c-49-88",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-49/88",
          "id": "eu:c-49-88",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-49-88"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_742"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Second, in so far as the undertakings in the Sinopec Group maintain that their right to be heard was not observed specifically in relation to the alleged additional condition for application stemming from the phrase ‘in particular if customers consistently pay different prices on the domestic market",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "88e45e09912b48ecfa5b81c0ce7cb6ab81ac50121fde09fac1f138715589f9e1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~cites~c-755-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-755/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_763"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the present case, since the action before the General Court is based on pleas which were the subject of an exchange of arguments before that Court and the examination of which does not require any further measure of organisation of procedure or inquiry to be taken in the case, the Court of Justic",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "681e988c26ba58c3911c5a6ee2929584cd4add83730f95d3cf11b21d9f1db660"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~cites~t-26-12",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-26/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_559"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Moreover, in the judgment of 25 June 2015, PT Musim Mas v Council ( T-26/12 , EU:T:2015:437 , paragraphs 79 and 80 ), the General Court previously held, correctly, that activities consisting in marketing products, taking care of contacts with existing and potential customers, soliciting and receivin",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "c075ec5dea57b3b90b6d958edc4d7cb4320451a4baf5f323eec0b1574b73a13f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-319-24-p~cites~t-762-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-319-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-762/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_74",
          "para_799"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By its appeal, the European Commission seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 21 February 2024, Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical and Others v Commission ( T-762/20 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2024:113 ), by which the General Court annulled Commission I",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "07fb3580505b966c85bfc13b73ba107f29398819befc3322d453f276273be134"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 19,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-319-24-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "42a73754ef3be9b760bbab834d2e9155e5800b99159f3ac02feadee3924c6609"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-319-24-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-319-24-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-319-24-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-319-24-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-319-24-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-319-24-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-319-24-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-319-24-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "hash": "sha256:79f6d631bdebe7676f8d7a2b23b48f541e3de994b4154831175c2cfc02c46963",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-15",
  "expires": "2026-10-16T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-15+legal-2026-10-15+2026-10-15T18:52:03",
    "content_hash": "sha256:79f6d631bdebe7676f8d7a2b23b48f541e3de994b4154831175c2cfc02c46963",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-15T21:28:47.788Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-319-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}