{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-275-06",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-275-06)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:eb86dc",
    "proof": "sha256:d7051848056c7d963a8a0ff906b3a85627e47851062c62895c8d3c6d189433b9",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-275-06",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-275-06",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-275-06"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-275-06",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-275-06",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-275-06",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-275-06",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-275-06",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-275-06",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-275-06",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-275-06",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-275-06",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-275-06",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-275-06",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-275-06"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-275-06",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-275-06",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-101-01",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-101/01",
          "id": "eu:c-101-01",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-101-01"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_193"
        ],
        "excerpt": "45 It is not disputed that the communication sought by Promusicae of the names and addresses of certain users of KaZaA involves the making available of personal data, that is, information relating to identified or identifiable natural persons, in accordance with the definition in Article 2(a) of Dir",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "b7b462b499de1cb059daee6dda0fcb91146b6863a5c6c7884c3af24afdb0e541"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-154-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-154/04",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_213"
        ],
        "excerpt": "62 It should be recalled that the fundamental right to property, which includes intellectual property rights such as copyright (see, to that effect, Case C-479/04 Laserdisken [2006] ECR I-8089, paragraph 65), and the fundamental right to effective judicial protection constitute general principles of",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "33630b8674d0fa85de98e6321551dc364d295b153dd5d16f36f45dda5e1d2457"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-155-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-155/04",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_213"
        ],
        "excerpt": "62 It should be recalled that the fundamental right to property, which includes intellectual property rights such as copyright (see, to that effect, Case C-479/04 Laserdisken [2006] ECR I-8089, paragraph 65), and the fundamental right to effective judicial protection constitute general principles of",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "75b56d54f25ff25d273a6d72415af96cd3d8d4f5549c58c25166f4c5e3118249"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-300-98",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-300/98",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_210"
        ],
        "excerpt": "60 As to Articles 41, 42 and 47 of the TRIPs Agreement, relied on by Promusicae, in the light of which Community law must as far as possible be interpreted where - as in the case of the provisions relied on in the context of the present reference for a preliminary ruling - it regulates a field to wh",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "b978e14fd304c469636dcc605fd07d2372b37a7aaa5634345b51fdb63ebecc3a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-305-05",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-305/05",
          "id": "eu:c-305-05",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-305-05"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_219"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Further, when implementing the measures transposing those directives, the authorities and courts of the Member States must not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with those directives but also make sure that they do not rely on an interpretation of them which would be in confli",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "21d82b7f9c32ee85dc0becdac84b7145991c529d070f693eb3129f7c46bedbeb"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-338-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-338/04",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_184"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the other hand, the Court does have jurisdiction to provide the national court with all the guidance as to the interpretation of Community law necessary to enable that court to rule on the compatibility of national rules with Community law (see, to that effect, Case C-506/04 Wilson [2006] ECR I-8",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "05bd49855cdeedad26ad448df04bfdda9a47eade19f7b7c8ead1014871b511d1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-359-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-359/04",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_184"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the other hand, the Court does have jurisdiction to provide the national court with all the guidance as to the interpretation of Community law necessary to enable that court to rule on the compatibility of national rules with Community law (see, to that effect, Case C-506/04 Wilson [2006] ECR I-8",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "61ca8d7ad2d3cf235c1430e90ae9ffb0ce2f67f8434243fc8ac1943f087a295b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-360-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-360/04",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_184"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the other hand, the Court does have jurisdiction to provide the national court with all the guidance as to the interpretation of Community law necessary to enable that court to rule on the compatibility of national rules with Community law (see, to that effect, Case C-506/04 Wilson [2006] ECR I-8",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "3e4b06ef4c6350856f1d3696aeee7f7d0e9b1409d188d9228a6be44f4ac93686"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-392-98",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-392/98",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_210"
        ],
        "excerpt": "60 As to Articles 41, 42 and 47 of the TRIPs Agreement, relied on by Promusicae, in the light of which Community law must as far as possible be interpreted where - as in the case of the provisions relied on in the context of the present reference for a preliminary ruling - it regulates a field to wh",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "593118a4902faf0de601c453173509dff4a266348f8d66ae85325eb467607a05"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-431-05",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-431/05",
          "id": "eu:c-431-05",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-431-05"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_210"
        ],
        "excerpt": "60 As to Articles 41, 42 and 47 of the TRIPs Agreement, relied on by Promusicae, in the light of which Community law must as far as possible be interpreted where - as in the case of the provisions relied on in the context of the present reference for a preliminary ruling - it regulates a field to wh",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "001d9770db8e4c9fe0de3549761dd253c30515ecb8411a8cf8caa40225dbc958"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-432-05",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-432/05",
          "id": "eu:c-432-05",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-432-05"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_213"
        ],
        "excerpt": "62 It should be recalled that the fundamental right to property, which includes intellectual property rights such as copyright (see, to that effect, Case C-479/04 Laserdisken [2006] ECR I-8089, paragraph 65), and the fundamental right to effective judicial protection constitute general principles of",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "e72866fc893fce9fbe907cf910d8974f953c3549d84082b7eae9248f69d4fc57"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-479-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-479/04",
          "id": "eu:c-479-04",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-479-04"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_213"
        ],
        "excerpt": "62 It should be recalled that the fundamental right to property, which includes intellectual property rights such as copyright (see, to that effect, Case C-479/04 Laserdisken [2006] ECR I-8089, paragraph 65), and the fundamental right to effective judicial protection constitute general principles of",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "6879312b0de1fba0724e5fed61941e57fe3d6e10f7ed3380d6bcb00159f12c39"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~follows~c-506-04",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-506/04",
          "id": "eu:c-506-04",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-506-04"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_184"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the other hand, the Court does have jurisdiction to provide the national court with all the guidance as to the interpretation of Community law necessary to enable that court to rule on the compatibility of national rules with Community law (see, to that effect, Case C-506/04 Wilson [2006] ECR I-8",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "040c57ca7d8a02188221e860c6c670af2b6bb9ccfd1342485539dbb367551228"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~cites~c-217-05",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-217/05",
          "id": "eu:c-217-05",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-217-05"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_182"
        ],
        "excerpt": "36 In this respect, it should be recalled that, in the context of the cooperation between the Court of Justice and the national courts provided for by Article 234 EC, it is solely for the national court before which the dispute has been brought, and which must assume responsibility for the subsequen",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "dd7ecf6a01666a70e77a1ca0f4a5457dfb453587e9614f9baab57b09e07091e7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-275-06~cites~c-392-05",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-275-06",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-392/05",
          "id": "eu:c-392-05",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-392-05"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_190"
        ],
        "excerpt": "42 Even if, formally, the national court has limited its question to the interpretation of Directives 2000/31, 2001/29 and 2004/48 and the Charter, that circumstance does not prevent the Court from providing the national court with all the elements of interpretation of Community law which may be of ",
        "decided": "2008-01-29",
        "hash": "15d56ed892355549305c77cc5cfc25607ddef706109e6a6bc2c7ddd18e96b97e"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62008cj0261~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62008cj0261",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:62008cj0261",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_127"
        ],
        "excerpt": "46 Lastly, having regard to the fact that it cannot be ruled out that Articles 6b and 23 of the CISA may be applicable, ratione temporis , in Case C-261/08 (see paragraphs 37 and 38 of this judgment), as the Austrian Government and the Commission of the European Communities suggest, it is appropriat"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62018cj0511~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62018cj0511",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:62018cj0511",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_950"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Questions related to the protection of the confidentiality of communications and personal data must be assessed on the basis of Directive 2002/58 and Regulation 2016/679, which replaced Directive 97/66 and Directive 95/46 respectively, and it should be noted that the protection that Directive 2000/3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62020cj0339~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62020cj0339",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:62020cj0339",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_385"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that the application of the measures governed by Directive 2003/6 and by Regulation No 596/2014 cannot, in any event, undermine the protection of personal data conferred under Directive 2002/58 (see, by analogy, judgment of 29 January 2008, Promusicae, C-275/06 , EU:C:2008:54 , paragraph "
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-119-12~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-119-12",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-119-12",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_125"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Article 6(2) and (5) of Directive 2002/58 contains an exception to the confidentiality of communications laid down in Article 5(1) by authorising traffic data processing in accordance with the requirements of billing services (see, to that effect, Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271 , paragrap"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-13-16~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-13-16",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-13-16",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_80",
          "para_83"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As the Advocate General stated in points 43 to 46 of his Opinion, such an interpretation may also be deduced from other EU instruments touching upon personal data (see, to that effect, as regards the processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector, judgment of 29 January 2008, Pr"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-203-15~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-203-15",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-203-15",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_432",
          "para_459",
          "para_461",
          "para_465",
          "para_469"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Admittedly, the legislative measures that are referred to in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58 concern activities characteristic of States or State authorities, and are unrelated to fields in which individuals are active (see, to that effect, judgment of 29 January 2008, Promusicae, C-275/06 , EU:C"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-283-11~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-283-11",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-283-11",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_184"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Where several rights and fundamental freedoms protected by the European Union legal order are at issue, the assessment of the possible disproportionate nature of a provision of European Union law must be carried out with a view to reconciling the requirements of the protection of those different rig"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-324-09~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-324-09",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-324-09",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_323"
        ],
        "excerpt": "131 Next, it must be stated that, in view of the objective pursued by Directive 2004/48, which is that the Member States should ensure, especially in the information society, effective protection of intellectual property (see, to that effect, Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271, paragraph 43),"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-346-06~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-346-06",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-346-06",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_116"
        ],
        "excerpt": "18 As suggested also by a number of the Governments which have submitted observations to the Court, as well as by the Commission of the European Communities, in order to give a useful answer to the national court, it is necessary to take into consideration the provisions of Directive 96/71 when exam"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-360-10~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-360-10",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-360-10",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_187"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As paragraphs 62 to 68 of the judgment in Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271 make clear, the protection of the fundamental right to property, which includes the rights linked to intellectual property, must be balanced against the protection of other fundamental rights."
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-401-19~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-401-19",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-401-19",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_311"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Further, when implementing the measures transposing that same provision, the authorities and courts of the Member States must not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with that provision but also make sure that they do not act on the basis of an interpretation of the provision wh"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-460-23-62023cj0460~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-460-23-62023cj0460",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-460-23-62023cj0460",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_225"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, in the light of the referring court’s doubts concerning the compatibility with EU law of the national provision transposing, inter alia, Article 1(1)(a) of Directive 2002/90 into Italian law, it must be borne in mind that it is settled case-law that, when implementing the measures trans"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-461-10~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-461-10",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-461-10",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_242"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The Högsta domstolen is of the opinion that, notwithstanding the judgment in Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271 and the order in Case C-557/07 LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten [2009] ECR I-1227 , doubts remain as to whether European Union law precludes the applicati"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-469-17~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-469-17",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-469-17",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_197",
          "para_218"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The mechanisms allowing those different rights and interests to be balanced are contained in Directive 2001/29 itself, in that it provides inter alia, first, in Articles 2 to 4 thereof, rightholders with exclusive rights and, second, in Article 5 thereof, for exceptions and limitations to those righ"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-470-21~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-470-21",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-470-21",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_510"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Moreover, allowing a public authority such as Hadopi to have access to data relating to the civil identity associated with a public IP address sent to it by rightholder organisations for the sole purpose of identifying the holder of that address used for online activities liable to infringe copyrigh"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-473-12~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-473-12",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-473-12",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_171"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That interpretation is also confirmed by the Court’s analysis in Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271 of Article 15(1) of the directive on privacy and electronic communications, which is formulated in similar terms to Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46 and, furthermore, expressly refers to that a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-476-17~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-476-17",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-476-17",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_233"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The mechanisms allowing those different rights and interests to be balanced are contained in Directive 2001/29 itself, in that it provides inter alia, first, in Articles 2 to 4 thereof, rightholders with exclusive rights and, second, in Article 5 thereof, for exceptions and limitations to those righ"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-484-14~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-484-14",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-484-14",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_309"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Where several fundamental rights protected under EU law are at stake, it is for the national authorities or courts concerned to ensure that a fair balance is struck between those rights (see, to that effect, judgment of 29 January 2008, Promusicae, C-275/06 , EU:C:2008:54 , paragraphs 68 and 70 )."
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-516-17~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-516-17",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-516-17",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_176",
          "para_195"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The mechanisms allowing those different rights and interests to be balanced are contained in Directive 2001/29 itself, in that it provides inter alia, first, in Articles 2 to 4 thereof, rightholders with exclusive rights and, second, in Article 5 thereof, for exceptions and limitations to those righ"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-544-10~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-544-10",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-544-10",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_203"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows from this that such an assessment must be carried out in accordance with the need to reconcile the requirements of the protection of those various fundamental rights protected by the Union legal order, and striking a fair balance between them (see, to that effect, Case C-275/06 Promusicae"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-553-07~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-553-07",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-553-07",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_104"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271, paragraph 63; and Case C-73/07 Satakunnan Markkinapörssi and Satamedia [2008] ECR I-0000, paragraph 52)."
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-07~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-07",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-07",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_99"
        ],
        "excerpt": "21 The Oberster Gerichtshof is of the view that the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271, delivered after the present order for reference, raises doubts as to whether the right to information conferred by Paragraph 87b(3) of the Austrian Federal Law on Copyrig"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-580-13~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-580-13",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-580-13",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_168",
          "para_170"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The present request for a preliminary ruling thus raises the question of the need to reconcile the requirements of the protection of different fundamental rights, namely the right to an effective remedy and the right to intellectual property, on the one hand, and the right to protection of personal "
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-597-19~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-597-19",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-597-19",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_426",
          "para_434",
          "para_436"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Article 15(1) ends the list of exceptions to the obligation to ensure the confidentiality of personal data with an express reference to Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46, corresponding, in essence, to Article 23(1) of Regulation 2016/679, which now allows both EU law and the law of the Member State t"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-601-15-ppu~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-601-15-ppu",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-601-15-ppu",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_300"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It should be recalled in that regard that, when a directive allows the Member States discretion to define transposition measures adapted to the various situations possible, they must, when implementing those measures, not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with the directive in"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-623-17-62017cj0623~follows~c-275-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-623-17-62017cj0623",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-623-17-62017cj0623",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_283"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that the disclosure of personal data by transmission, like the storage or otherwise making available of data, constitutes processing for the purposes of Article 3 of Directive 2002/58 and, accordingly, falls within the scope of that directive (see, to that effect, judgment of 29 January 2"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-70-10~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-70-10",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-70-10",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_147"
        ],
        "excerpt": "44 As paragraphs 62 to 68 of the judgment in Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271 make clear, the protection of the fundamental right to property, which includes the rights linked to intellectual property, must be balanced against the protection of other fundamental rights."
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-797-23-62023cj0797~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-797-23-62023cj0797",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-797-23-62023cj0797",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_371"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Lastly, as to whether that legislation is proportionate in the strict sense, it is necessary to ascertain whether the measures provided for are not disproportionate to the objectives pursued, bearing in mind that, where several fundamental rights are at hand, such as, in the present case, the freedo"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:no:hr-2022-328-a~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "no:hr-2022-328-a",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/no:hr-2022-328-a",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_405"
        ],
        "excerpt": "avveining av motstridende hensyn, se EU-domstolens dom 29. januar i sak C-275/06"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:se:nja-2012-s-975~cites~c-275-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "se:nja-2012-s-975",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/se:nja-2012-s-975",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_50",
          "para_55",
          "para_75",
          "para_89",
          "para_91",
          "para_97",
          "para_127",
          "para_130",
          "para_137",
          "para_168",
          "para_341",
          "para_394"
        ],
        "excerpt": "EG-domstolens dom i mål C-275/06 och Datalagringsdirektivet"
      }
    ],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 15,
      "incoming": 30,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-275-06?follow=5",
    "hash": "7345e0c8fdd5cc894095026687f98e7461f995979cc29d67d31a718931f4217e"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-275-06",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-275-06",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-275-06",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-275-06"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-275-06?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-275-06",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-275-06"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-275-06"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-275-06",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-275-06",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-275-06"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-275-06",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "7345e0c8fdd5cc894095026687f98e7461f995979cc29d67d31a718931f4217e",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:d7051848056c7d963a8a0ff906b3a85627e47851062c62895c8d3c6d189433b9",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
  "expires": "2026-10-26T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-25+legal-2026-10-25+2026-10-25T13:37:31",
    "content_hash": "sha256:d7051848056c7d963a8a0ff906b3a85627e47851062c62895c8d3c6d189433b9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-25T23:45:23.974Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-275-06",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}