{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-145-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-04",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:4e42b5",
    "proof": "sha256:2e7927da8e99835ddaf327641d3b1adb4b9102cf5b4e0649facc795ffdb4606d",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "brand": {
    "product": "NovaCopilot",
    "platform": "ExploreWorldAI",
    "infrastructure": "ExploreWorld Legal",
    "infrastructure_url": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "legal_entity": "Valkiv Ventures AB",
    "permanent_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/novacopilot",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "powered_by": "Powered by NovaCopilot",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/licensvillkor",
    "contact": "stig@valkiv.com"
  },
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-145-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-145-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-145-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "obligation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/obligation/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "sanction": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/sanction/eu:c-145-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-145-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-145-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-145-24-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-122-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-122/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_114",
          "para_115"
        ],
        "excerpt": "54 In that regard, it is apparent from the case-law of the Court of Justice that, although the measure of discretion left by the rule of law infringed to the EU authority is a relevant factor which must be taken into consideration in all cases in order to determine whether that authority committed a",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "5eed42ee7390fa53b153152af88f933bd0e2ab5f57bde47b14c7b96246b45479"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-198-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-198/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_131"
        ],
        "excerpt": "67 However, as the Advocate General observed in point 42 of his Opinion, the factual assessment of the causal link carried out by the General Court falls outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice on appeal, except where the facts or evidence has been distorted (see, to that effect, judgment o",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "b12e6263aa73fa2512d68ca8a90a953a7f52a369900ead5ba945f119c5ea19e4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-282-05",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-282/05",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_109"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Conversely, where that institution was not faced with legislative choices and had only considerably reduced, or even no, discretion, the mere infringement of EU law may be sufficient to establish the existence of a sufficiently serious breach (see, to that effect, judgments of 19 April 2007, Holcim ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "9ef43f9c6acb5c32c42ecd41bd80770d9ff14089970d819ddf32663da2a446be"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-35-92",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-35/92",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_142"
        ],
        "excerpt": "75 It follows from the case-law of the Court of Justice that a ground of appeal directed against grounds of a judgment under appeal which have no bearing on the operative part of that judgment is ineffective and must therefore be rejected (see, to that effect, judgments of 18 March 1993, Parliament ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "c3d7e1371a2da0fb480ae3d0339ef13b7c7bda2114a36afbdc1141c1c1276eb8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-419-08",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-419/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_161"
        ],
        "excerpt": "91 It thus appears that, even in the case of a possible contribution by the institutions to the damage for which compensation is sought, that contribution might be too remote because of other factors, such as responsibility resting on third parties or, as the case may be, on the applicants (see, to ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "704dba9f70202833f40a2ddb98532de484ed46d45901ad5f9e608dbdd43a7ba8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-469-11",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-469/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_81"
        ],
        "excerpt": "24 In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, that period begins to run once the requirements governing the obligation to provide compensation for damage are satisfied and, in particular, once the damage to be made good has materialised (see judgment of 8 November 2012, Evropaïki Dynam",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "e5be44806af55de06fc4951512641d9b7a3d54db88bc2d44446b94def550f76d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-549-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-549/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_142",
          "para_159"
        ],
        "excerpt": "75 It follows from the case-law of the Court of Justice that a ground of appeal directed against grounds of a judgment under appeal which have no bearing on the operative part of that judgment is ineffective and must therefore be rejected (see, to that effect, judgments of 18 March 1993, Parliament ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "c6d6d47f013c4f5d09704cf6dc7de76392a78f2e439b30f0e595e514b834efe3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~follows~c-755-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-755/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_106",
          "para_109"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Conversely, where that institution was not faced with legislative choices and had only considerably reduced, or even no, discretion, the mere infringement of EU law may be sufficient to establish the existence of a sufficiently serious breach (see, to that effect, judgments of 19 April 2007, Holcim ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "d0d83c6a28082444a68c392d0a44a1ef0dac05b4e57fcc519d1f9f3d7d074f0e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-105-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-105/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_100",
          "para_101"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Such an appeal amounts in reality to no more than a request for re-examination of the application submitted to the General Court, a matter which falls outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice (judgment of 20 September 2016, Mallis and Others v Commission and ECB , C-105/15 P to C-109/15 P, E",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "5a41c2f3e2e0c457ff02193cbd8af6f42a08263904d66652fc1272d13c2fdfb0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-109-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-109/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_100",
          "para_101"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Such an appeal amounts in reality to no more than a request for re-examination of the application submitted to the General Court, a matter which falls outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice (judgment of 20 September 2016, Mallis and Others v Commission and ECB , C-105/15 P to C-109/15 P, E",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "595da236db43826a5bb86277d22213cc6ecfab29adab374951c23671b2411fa8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-145-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-145/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-145/24 P,",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "6750fcde81feb69186490e701e24aaaa6c92cf6151940ed3dd06ddbc355c7e0e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-385-07",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-385/07",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_172"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Whether or not the evidence before it is sufficient is a matter to be appraised by it alone and is not subject to review by the Court of Justice on appeal, except where that evidence has been distorted or the substantive inaccuracy of the findings of the General Court is apparent from the documents ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "398c53cee8de926c057f721da813149058db35e69c74850539b4f961481495fd"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-425-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-425/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_45",
          "para_91",
          "para_110",
          "para_117"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019, Italy and Others v Commission (T-98/16, T-196/16 and T-198/16, EU:T:2019:167), upheld by the Court of Justice in its judgment of 2 March 2021, Commission v Italy and Others (C-425/19 P, EU:C:2021:154), the Tercas decision was annulled.",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "0627cc1c62a73fc3325fc5781916bc08aa5da54171868df1a801b7b7188f840e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-430-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-430/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_78"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It results from the case-law of the Court of Justice that the classification for legal purposes of an act by the General Court is a question of law which may be raised in an appeal (judgment of 12 May 2022, Klein v Commission , C-430/20 P, EU:C:2022:377, paragraph 41 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "865b90ff7aaf0cffa0248611210770c5ff71fd09fb86ae4555760bf03dd949fa"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-440-07",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-440/07",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_113",
          "para_130"
        ],
        "excerpt": "53 As regards, second, the appellant’s argument that the General Court should not have relied on the factual and legal complexity of the case in order to rule out the existence of such a sufficiently serious breach, it follows from the case-law of the Court of Justice, correctly recalled by the Gene",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "4a91f27f1cff22e59edf88bac14207d61f3c7b3c15b04625511466df19119451"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-447-17",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-447/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_160"
        ],
        "excerpt": "90 More specifically, the damage must flow sufficiently directly from the unlawful conduct (judgment of 5 September 2019, European Union v Guardian Europe and Guardian Europe v European Union , C-447/17 P and C-479/17 P, EU:C:2019:672, paragraph 135).",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "3329789d122788e7e39d02ce864430a0ecd9f141ac918ffae418955f48bc2099"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-460-09",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-460/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_83"
        ],
        "excerpt": "26 In so far as the appellant submits, contrary to what follows from paragraph 61 of the judgment under appeal, that the damage resulting from the reduction in staff numbers was continuous in nature because it resulted from the successive disbursements linked to the staff departures, it should be no",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "1e93ed233608f903cfacf385ad4b03cefe3d33d497a9f5f03afc89c26cd7130c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-479-17",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-479/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_160"
        ],
        "excerpt": "90 More specifically, the damage must flow sufficiently directly from the unlawful conduct (judgment of 5 September 2019, European Union v Guardian Europe and Guardian Europe v European Union , C-447/17 P and C-479/17 P, EU:C:2019:672, paragraph 135).",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "f2485d46446c5331c9746d0689bcb6f5623f02d1f56182ec7125c1c54fd64bf6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-486-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-486/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_111"
        ],
        "excerpt": "For that reason, the EU Courts must in principle, having regard both to the specific features of the case before them and to the technical or complex nature of the Commission’s assessments, carry out a comprehensive review as to whether a measure falls within the scope of Article 107(1) TFEU (judgme",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "74cddabafb45e0ded373b99c4db28f2ea0ff289b8dd6e34a038622565044111a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-583-11",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-583/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_98"
        ],
        "excerpt": "38 In the first place, as regards the admissibility of the second ground of appeal, in so far as the Commission criticises the appellant, first, for failing to identify precisely which paragraphs of the judgment under appeal are being challenged, it must be recalled that, according to the case-law o",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "1586cf499a16c1cb7e6788034a6e11a0e46d47a92948a4b3374c1caaaf78d8cc"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-619-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-619/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_116"
        ],
        "excerpt": "56 Such difficulties of interpretation and application may be such as to explain the conduct of an institution where it turns out that it acted as an ordinarily careful and diligent administration would have done in similar circumstances (judgment of 22 September 2022, IMG v Commission , C-619/20 P ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "6810aa816be87c5be1a3b7d17647463b71d52fa8a70f73d1daa1ebb35803ef5c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-620-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-620/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_116"
        ],
        "excerpt": "56 Such difficulties of interpretation and application may be such as to explain the conduct of an institution where it turns out that it acted as an ordinarily careful and diligent administration would have done in similar circumstances (judgment of 22 September 2022, IMG v Commission , C-619/20 P ",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "d7d72f80d7f4426b4c5f4a8f0b6a33badf0caa3f28214e41ccfa8f8ef24a95d1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~c-638-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-638/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_103"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to review extends, inter alia, to the question whether the General Court has taken the right legal criteria as the basis for its appraisal of the facts (judgment of 25 January 2022, Commission v European Food and Others , C-638/19 P, EU:C:2022:50, paragraph 7",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "52f7961462d601290878fcd2178795782b69cf332f80ef22a2fe9a94d358bf42"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~t-196-16",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-196/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_45",
          "para_91",
          "para_110",
          "para_117"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019, Italy and Others v Commission (T-98/16, T-196/16 and T-198/16, EU:T:2019:167), upheld by the Court of Justice in its judgment of 2 March 2021, Commission v Italy and Others (C-425/19 P, EU:C:2021:154), the Tercas decision was annulled.",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "8c5b2454529d5d05e44355bfd49185a263315c88ef04a69e508b012bb149e999"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~t-198-16",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-198/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_45",
          "para_91",
          "para_110",
          "para_117"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019, Italy and Others v Commission (T-98/16, T-196/16 and T-198/16, EU:T:2019:167), upheld by the Court of Justice in its judgment of 2 March 2021, Commission v Italy and Others (C-425/19 P, EU:C:2021:154), the Tercas decision was annulled.",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "ad6f3cb107df94dbca2a728696d0d3dd113efb6190ccf2c37cdf7f45d324de30"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~t-415-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-415/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_20"
        ],
        "excerpt": "1 By its appeal, BdM Banca SpA, formerly Banca Popolare di Bari SpA, asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court oof the European Union of 20 December 2023, Banca Popolare di Bari v Commission (T-415/21, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2023:833), by which the General C",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "685da4e25fe4261604a48667149cb7f926dd2950ed2ae299c70444f00dfa47c7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~t-635-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-635/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_137",
          "para_140",
          "para_141"
        ],
        "excerpt": "71 By the second part of the third ground of appeal, the appellant complains that the General Court wrongly referred, in paragraphs 150 and 151 of the judgment under appeal, to the judgment of 30 June 2021, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro and Others v Commission (T-635/19, EU:T:2021:394), wi",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "312d322311db0b449371ed33b5c1821ca2926038f0b4120526c3e3c550f4bf7c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-145-24-p~cites~t-98-16",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-145-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-98/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_45",
          "para_91",
          "para_110",
          "para_117"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019, Italy and Others v Commission (T-98/16, T-196/16 and T-198/16, EU:T:2019:167), upheld by the Court of Justice in its judgment of 2 March 2021, Commission v Italy and Others (C-425/19 P, EU:C:2021:154), the Tercas decision was annulled.",
        "decided": "2026-09-03",
        "hash": "8af94a1dfb75a6cdcb03e0ee44f8f51f7272fc10cdc77a0d508d57981e29f6f0"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 28,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-145-24-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "f8ecbb605547ce9180dc8f861eeff4eb04eaa75a9d68a080877e1514c24bfbc8"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "hash": "sha256:2e7927da8e99835ddaf327641d3b1adb4b9102cf5b4e0649facc795ffdb4606d",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-04",
  "expires": "2026-10-05T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-04+legal-2026-10-04+2026-10-04T12:49:24",
    "content_hash": "sha256:2e7927da8e99835ddaf327641d3b1adb4b9102cf5b4e0649facc795ffdb4606d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-04T14:22:50.216Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-145-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}