{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:62024cj0816",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:62024cj0816)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-23",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:458e58",
    "proof": "sha256:0c44a9d38d42d1dd7165c0ed7fccd853aba9e14b26d605fd005d3bb5668fabe8",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:62024cj0816",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:62024cj0816",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:62024cj0816"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:62024cj0816",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:62024cj0816",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:62024cj0816",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:62024cj0816",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:62024cj0816",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:62024cj0816",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:62024cj0816",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:62024cj0816",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:62024cj0816",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:62024cj0816",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:62024cj0816",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:62024cj0816"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:62024cj0816",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:62024cj0816",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~distinguishes~c-54-20",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-54/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_234"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that connection, according to settled case-law, the obligation of the General Court to state reasons, pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU and Article 36 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, is an essential procedural requirement that must be distinguished",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "76800ce050d83d98b0138ff0a8f153706efc7b73602dd1e28d3b6ffcbb5868b7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~follows~c-248-17",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-248/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_313"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Conversely, the Court of Justice has jurisdiction under Article 256 TFEU to review the legal characterisation of those facts by the General Court and the legal conclusions which it has drawn from them (judgment of 1 August 2025, Timchenko v Council, C-703/23 P , EU:C:2025:608 , paragraph 24 and the ",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "74b73863acb53cbe122ca26e1ea7853443698a6ffb72279984089d9038dab3f5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~follows~c-326-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-326/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_381",
          "para_407",
          "para_463"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In those specific circumstances, the General Court did not err in finding, in paragraph 105 of the third judgment under appeal, that BPC was a source of revenue for the Lukashenko regime and thereby supported that regime, irrespective of whether, in that connection, those revenues were ultimately re",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "2177f95b5d46079bbe605062760d985232e9074ea6b242ff29f8a74e04d3119d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~follows~c-570-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-570/19",
          "id": "eu:c-570-19-62019cj0570",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-570-19-62019cj0570"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_266"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is also clear from the case-law of the Court of Justice that it cannot be considered that there has been infringement of the principle of legal certainty on the sole ground that the Courts of the European Union must interpret a provision of general application by resorting, where appropriate, to ",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "f507fd973c4dae8bb71be33be6ac1c1bf91adf52a78d2d57d691773061377949"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~follows~c-702-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-702/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_396"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Given that, as is clear from paragraph 139 of the present judgment, the first grounds of appeal in Cases C-816/24 P and C-817/24 P must be rejected in their entirety, the respective second grounds raised by Belaruskali and Mr Golovaty in those cases, each claiming that the General Court erred in its",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "37e333802ed2dcb89aa431e466f3577e1e097be18d553b16436d29d89d9ea7fd"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~follows~c-703-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-703/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_264",
          "para_313",
          "para_367"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Conversely, the Court of Justice has jurisdiction under Article 256 TFEU to review the legal characterisation of those facts by the General Court and the legal conclusions which it has drawn from them (judgment of 1 August 2025, Timchenko v Council, C-703/23 P , EU:C:2025:608 , paragraph 24 and the ",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "41978fa636003b81d43de6551332a0eced6e9828f9cb4fc7ce008468caba06f0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~follows~c-816-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-816/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5",
          "para_8",
          "para_20",
          "para_32",
          "para_158",
          "para_201",
          "para_207",
          "para_208",
          "para_211",
          "para_284",
          "para_285",
          "para_288"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Given that, as is clear from paragraph 139 of the present judgment, the first grounds of appeal in Cases C-816/24 P and C-817/24 P must be rejected in their entirety, the respective second grounds raised by Belaruskali and Mr Golovaty in those cases, each claiming that the General Court erred in its",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "250a30a9a210221653c54cb91ebe4b3390fe23b731501f068b22d42d55c19957"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~follows~c-817-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-817/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5",
          "para_10",
          "para_32",
          "para_166",
          "para_203",
          "para_207",
          "para_208",
          "para_211",
          "para_284",
          "para_285",
          "para_288",
          "para_385"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Given that, as is clear from paragraph 139 of the present judgment, the first grounds of appeal in Cases C-816/24 P and C-817/24 P must be rejected in their entirety, the respective second grounds raised by Belaruskali and Mr Golovaty in those cases, each claiming that the General Court erred in its",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "45bf526d6b3fd742be48f768a0e77ad6413e5674c7b64190a89d0cee0bc9732b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-111-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-111/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_432",
          "para_434",
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It also stated that, even where it has broad discretion, the Council must base its choice on objective criteria and examine whether the aims pursued by the measure chosen are such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences for certain operators (judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyans",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "57d7aebaa68f3469cc8fb6836aab83f031181d8b0ea9b17f967cf539eb4ec2c9"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-128-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-128/22",
          "id": "eu:c-128-22",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-128-22"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_434"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In order to determine whether the restrictive measures enacted by the European Union or the general rules laid down in an EU act imposing restrictive measures comply with the principle of proportionality, it is necessary to ascertain, first, whether those measures or rules meet an objective of gener",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "5e0538acbd9472dab0a625cb6cfda130e7dc915d7c966ed2a43aef8e7307f085"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-35-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-35/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_432",
          "para_434",
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It also stated that, even where it has broad discretion, the Council must base its choice on objective criteria and examine whether the aims pursued by the measure chosen are such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences for certain operators (judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyans",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "b513678969809b7cddb1d673e3975a643b007ff2bd547d35e4a875e1c97e0b3b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-352-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-352/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_232"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the first place, in so far as the appellants submit that the General Court failed to address the arguments by way of which they maintained that the concept of ‘Lukashenko regime’, for the purposes of criterion (b), was not sufficiently clear and precise, with the result that it was contrary to th",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "7ef44857c953aaaf78b8a84aebb4639d75c4cdc5a8dbe6ea44322ef69a279b64"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-369-09",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-369/09",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_446"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, in an appeal, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice is confined to a review of the findings of law on the pleas and arguments presented before the General Court (see judgment of 24 March 2011, ISD Polska and Others v Commission, C-369/09 P , EU:C:2011:175 , paragraph 83 ).",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "59e60fac416b8a5698b4c6524b3f6e46bbe7a6307bb2de8c658df9c8da3a33ec"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-541-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-541/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_262"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That principle requires, inter alia, that legislation must enable those concerned to know precisely the extent of the obligations imposed on them, and those persons must be able to ascertain unequivocally their rights and obligations and take steps accordingly (judgment of 4 October 2024, Lithuania ",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "9882abf6b31f0c2e9940c89f88a2e971c82d6f20aaa2f38af35f518474f018c5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-555-20",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-555/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_262"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That principle requires, inter alia, that legislation must enable those concerned to know precisely the extent of the obligations imposed on them, and those persons must be able to ascertain unequivocally their rights and obligations and take steps accordingly (judgment of 4 October 2024, Lithuania ",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "240a86ba16153d0364abfa97cb84125d276a7e7134176623b8faa84fc1314aff"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-588-17",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-588/17",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_315"
        ],
        "excerpt": "To that end, an appellant must indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted by the General Court and show the errors of appraisal which, in its view, led to that distortion (judgment of 25 July 2018, Spain v Commission, C-588/17 P , EU:C:2018:607 , paragraph 35 and the case-law cit",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "140287101aaaa5a4b41fbf963b27a21cdc9e2887adfb35ff3b57e551a6c58d09"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-680-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-680/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_236"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The obligation to state reasons does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case, since the General Court’s reasoning may be implicit on condition that it enables the persons concerned to know ",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "3da52f28e79f2395505fa4564ad25379f92e8e38e022da53e875ed2443f79efe"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-696-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-696/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_432",
          "para_434",
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It also stated that, even where it has broad discretion, the Council must base its choice on objective criteria and examine whether the aims pursued by the measure chosen are such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences for certain operators (judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyans",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "6a8764b00fc18f14809986cbc7e6cd2209d77dfb86b45a8460b8eaa8f85ec77c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-704-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-704/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_432",
          "para_434",
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It also stated that, even where it has broad discretion, the Council must base its choice on objective criteria and examine whether the aims pursued by the measure chosen are such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences for certain operators (judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyans",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "450473a5e27705db9ea03966116827fc72129b62a257bdc858163bcedcf8efdc"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-711-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-711/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_432",
          "para_434",
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It also stated that, even where it has broad discretion, the Council must base its choice on objective criteria and examine whether the aims pursued by the measure chosen are such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences for certain operators (judgment of 26 March 2026, Pumpyans",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "b2ffba58ce57508da57028b31ab3837e8d23df09e19464f8959f19d505b07944"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-729-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-729/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_444"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Second, with a view to establishing that the restrictive measures to which it is subject are inappropriate, BPC failed before the General Court to give examples of measures which would be less restrictive but equally effective in achieving that objective, and which the Council could have adopted (se",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "838a7f5c115cd678eac37dea2a7c2f262ad38e1597142c503d8a09e1bfb472a7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~c-818-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-818/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5",
          "para_12",
          "para_32",
          "para_174",
          "para_205",
          "para_207",
          "para_208",
          "para_211",
          "para_284",
          "para_285",
          "para_288",
          "para_385"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Joined Cases C-816/24 P, C-817/24 P and C-818/24 P",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "b43dc5e3e59ca18bc4af57aed0e2ea214548963deb7f9e0eeb84509bbd82bdc0"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~t-521-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-521/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_32"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By their respective appeals, Belaruskali AAT, Mr Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT (‘BPC’) seek to have set aside, first (Case C-816/24 P), the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 18 September 2024, Belaruskali v Council ( T-528/22 , EU:T:2024:633 ; ‘the fi",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "df8e6ec1a8dd38ac98457bdb271ee8a8da7089a616c52314199917b5556383a6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~t-528-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-528/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_32"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By their respective appeals, Belaruskali AAT, Mr Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT (‘BPC’) seek to have set aside, first (Case C-816/24 P), the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 18 September 2024, Belaruskali v Council ( T-528/22 , EU:T:2024:633 ; ‘the fi",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "7e9212b16ca659b719b7bbf8cfb73ac7baa78a004b6d65f9c9bcfe795fce40ff"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:62024cj0816~cites~t-534-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:62024cj0816",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-534/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_32"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By their respective appeals, Belaruskali AAT, Mr Ivan Ivanovich Golovaty and Belarusian Potash Company AAT (‘BPC’) seek to have set aside, first (Case C-816/24 P), the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 18 September 2024, Belaruskali v Council ( T-528/22 , EU:T:2024:633 ; ‘the fi",
        "decided": "2026-06-18",
        "hash": "7a2af271c48d58111d3dca7ef647ff4aa8db0703a7c5fc4533c579e16a27b708"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 25,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:62024cj0816?follow=5",
    "hash": "eae6b6bcdc87e927d7e8b9e0f7fab177a009263d528d0f37b327fabfa75cc44d"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:62024cj0816",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:62024cj0816",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:62024cj0816",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:62024cj0816"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:62024cj0816?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/62024cj0816",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/62024cj0816"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:62024cj0816"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:62024cj0816",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "eae6b6bcdc87e927d7e8b9e0f7fab177a009263d528d0f37b327fabfa75cc44d",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:0c44a9d38d42d1dd7165c0ed7fccd853aba9e14b26d605fd005d3bb5668fabe8",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-23",
  "expires": "2026-10-24T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-23+legal-2026-10-23+2026-10-23T14:34:08",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0c44a9d38d42d1dd7165c0ed7fccd853aba9e14b26d605fd005d3bb5668fabe8",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-23T22:17:18.378Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:62024cj0816",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}