{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-911-19",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-911-19)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:e18823",
    "proof": "sha256:8001ba813eb13557715a70364419bb8d24bfccdb70eb53a88f8800749b393332",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-911-19",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-911-19",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-911-19"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-911-19",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-911-19",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-911-19",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-911-19",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-911-19",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-911-19",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-911-19",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-911-19",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-911-19",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-911-19",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-911-19",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-911-19"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-911-19",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-911-19",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-131-03",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-131/03",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_193"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Conversely, any European Union act not producing binding legal effects falls outside the scope of the judicial review provided for in Article 263 TFEU (see, to that effect, judgments of 12 September 2006, Reynolds Tobacco and Others v Commission, C-131/03 P , EU:C:2006:541 , paragraph 55 , and of 20",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "26c0eaecefa464ee22aae4302000b8a5f5698b5499c20ed3273b4bea4fbe2f7c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-16-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-16/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_191",
          "para_193",
          "para_195",
          "para_203",
          "para_215",
          "para_228",
          "para_230"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is settled case-law of the Court that actions for annulment, provided for under Article 263 TFEU, are available in the case of all measures adopted by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union, whatever their form, which are intended to have binding legal effects (see, ",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "8d401d7789b3b0439bb24da43eba2ed349fa755dcdc9b32e2f16dfb79d1a6e66"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-270-12",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-270/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_258"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Since it is apparent from Regulation No 1093/2010 that the EU legislature has precisely delineated the EBA’s power to issue guidelines, on the basis of objective criteria, the exercise of that power must be amenable to stringent judicial review in the light of those objective criteria (see, to that ",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "01fa17447b98915a066ca83d6501f31774203640edbe4ee406f80adc0381070c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-308-06",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-308/06",
          "id": "eu:c-308-06",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-308-06"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_251"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the contrary, it is apparent from the case-law of the Court that a request for a preliminary ruling on validity must be regarded as admissible where it has been made in the course of a genuine dispute in which a question on the validity of an EU act is raised indirectly, even if that act has not ",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "74e9b2c5d192e32e18e8bbcf53eaa7bb9cbfaa44cea6ea28f5672fe879d07c9a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-322-88",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-322/88",
          "id": "eu:c-322-88",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-322-88"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_228",
          "para_266"
        ],
        "excerpt": "As the Court has already held, Article 19(3)(b) TEU and point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 267 TFEU provide that the Court has jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings on the interpretation of EU law and the validity of acts adopted by the EU institutions without exception (see, to that eff",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "5945efdf0ddbe0bc42c2a3ae9421fd5bf92290da107a74daee0be43e925a3c74"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-501-18",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-501/18",
          "id": "eu:c-501-18",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-501-18"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_234",
          "para_266"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The Court has, moreover, already recognised that it has jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling on the validity of a recommendation of the EBA which does not have binding legal effects (see, to that effect, judgment of 25 March 2021, Balgarska Narodna Banka, C-501/18 , EU:C:2021:249 , paragraph 83",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "82ddf189d217ea080be301072f832a56e4fea51a7b2b9ec4893452a21e533120"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-583-11",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-583/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_243",
          "para_245",
          "para_247",
          "para_249"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, according to the Court’s settled case-law, the FEU Treaty has established, by Articles 263 and 277, on the one hand, and Article 267, on the other, a complete system of legal remedies and procedures designed to ensure judicial review of the legality of European Union acts, and has entru",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "1e8b587edc5d6b36c1f6968be9a195f436658aae28515aa0daea8003b0c88f1f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-599-15",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-599/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_195"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In order to determine whether an act produces binding legal effects, it is necessary, in accordance with the settled case-law of the Court, to examine the substance of that act and to assess its effects on the basis of objective criteria, such as the content of that act, taking into account, as appr",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "ade8202cb959fc8b8f39f0b1c4e077cc892af294ceb7be3b111cbabc118b3f78"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-62-14",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-62/14",
          "id": "eu:c-62-14",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-62-14"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_251"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the contrary, it is apparent from the case-law of the Court that a request for a preliminary ruling on validity must be regarded as admissible where it has been made in the course of a genuine dispute in which a question on the validity of an EU act is raised indirectly, even if that act has not ",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "1ccfd6d7044e1ce19882bde4d6c7908244d5985038df553e8c0aac56e36b39f9"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-621-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-621/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_191"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is settled case-law of the Court that actions for annulment, provided for under Article 263 TFEU, are available in the case of all measures adopted by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union, whatever their form, which are intended to have binding legal effects (see, ",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "2746bc02871ec43b93d0ebaec8db6e875608edfa955c0dc39fbcee85048d179e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~follows~c-643-16",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-643/16",
          "id": "eu:c-643-16",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-643-16"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_251"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the contrary, it is apparent from the case-law of the Court that a request for a preliminary ruling on validity must be regarded as admissible where it has been made in the course of a genuine dispute in which a question on the validity of an EU act is raised indirectly, even if that act has not ",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "88180d3e86c222059b93c7f0475ecb710e5f6cdad971d462a1f6e8d6c101ab92"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-911-19~cites~c-28-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-911-19",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-28/15",
          "id": "eu:c-28-15",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-28-15"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_209"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The guidelines issued by the EBA cannot, therefore, be regarded as producing binding legal effects vis-à-vis the competent authorities (see, by analogy, judgment of 15 September 2016, Koninklijke KPN and Others, C-28/15 , EU:C:2016:692 , paragraphs 34 and 35 ).",
        "decided": "2021-07-15",
        "hash": "a23a3db4e88e7814b95453d4b05d0a91e8954bd93dbdf2d94a51998fd4bce578"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-423-23~follows~c-911-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-423-23",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-423-23",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_230"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, in so far as the Belgian Government challenges the admissibility of some of the questions referred in so far as they seek the interpretation of recitals of EU acts even though they have no binding legal force, suffice it to note that that fact alone is not capable of establishing the al"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-626-21~follows~c-911-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-626-21",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-626-21",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_387"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, in the absence of EU rules governing the matter, it is for the domestic legal system of each Member State, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy of the latter, to lay down the detailed procedural rules governing actions brought to safeguard rights whi"
      }
    ],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 12,
      "incoming": 2,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-911-19?follow=5",
    "hash": "b7e1484f3bf98558ecf7d429568e57dc3cc817eb23a9b00481e11828cd48e210"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-911-19",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-911-19",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-911-19",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-911-19"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-911-19?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-911-19",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-911-19"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-911-19"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-911-19",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-911-19",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-911-19"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-911-19",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "b7e1484f3bf98558ecf7d429568e57dc3cc817eb23a9b00481e11828cd48e210",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:8001ba813eb13557715a70364419bb8d24bfccdb70eb53a88f8800749b393332",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
  "expires": "2026-10-26T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-25+legal-2026-10-25+2026-10-25T13:37:31",
    "content_hash": "sha256:8001ba813eb13557715a70364419bb8d24bfccdb70eb53a88f8800749b393332",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-26T00:44:20.692Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-911-19",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}