{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-882-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-28",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:3c6bce",
    "proof": "sha256:43fddd728f506883ed586bdb39759f7b22ddd9dee5f1dc4818f7b15e0697fd31",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-882-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-882-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-882-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-882-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-882-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-882-24-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~follows~c-326-05",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-326/05",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_94"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the second place, it should be borne in mind that an appeal is limited to points of law, to the exclusion of any appraisal of the facts, save where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted, and that a finding of distortion precludes recourse to new evidence which has not been produced b",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "79e37c28b808197e635ca8f5513ed02efeb8dc401568fba4d3ab883fa8824d6b"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~follows~c-45-15",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-45/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_94"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the second place, it should be borne in mind that an appeal is limited to points of law, to the exclusion of any appraisal of the facts, save where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted, and that a finding of distortion precludes recourse to new evidence which has not been produced b",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "54a215ae97434811c07f166b1d450b2ecdc02484b5e9bbf9783510331a85c32a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~follows~c-485-08",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-485/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_133"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is true that, according to settled case-law, the legality of the contested act must be assessed on the basis of the facts and the law as they stood at the time when the measure was adopted (judgments of 7 February 1979, France v Commission, 15/76 and 16/76 , EU:C:1979:29 , paragraph 7 ; of 15 Apr",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "bcebdfcde9969b51fb744360dde841f4ab47c145f5d5325391a51fdd0d6a95d8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~follows~c-541-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-541/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_133"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is true that, according to settled case-law, the legality of the contested act must be assessed on the basis of the facts and the law as they stood at the time when the measure was adopted (judgments of 7 February 1979, France v Commission, 15/76 and 16/76 , EU:C:1979:29 , paragraph 7 ; of 15 Apr",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "1d45c4afdfbce85c8cdb35ff8ff46997d3af186dac5c3efabfa1cdb04649baa8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~follows~c-727-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-727/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_145"
        ],
        "excerpt": "First, as is apparent from the case-law of the Court of Justice, the purpose of the pre-litigation procedure provided for by Article 91 of the Staff Regulations is to enable and encourage an amicable settlement of the dispute between officials and the administration and not to be strictly and defini",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "fbde50223da91075194ccf7ed647e9cf6fe7063cef2fbbb6a18fc212240b7514"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~c-136-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-136/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_186"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, and as regards the paragraph of the judgment under appeal criticised in the third ground of appeal, it must be borne in mind that it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Unio",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "f06d39597121478cabe5abf243ef96a083f2684c55181fd0508698b6cfac943c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~c-341-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-341/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_201"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Consequently, the subject matter of the dispute remaining before the Court of Justice following that setting aside is now limited to the challenge to the decision at issue set out in that fourth plea in law (see, by analogy, judgment of 1 July 2008, Chronopost and La Poste v UFEX and Others, C-341/0",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "357150691126f77ae0859b9ac3fad05e382734913b982e1611d4abee35785825"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~c-342-06",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-342/06",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_201"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Consequently, the subject matter of the dispute remaining before the Court of Justice following that setting aside is now limited to the challenge to the decision at issue set out in that fourth plea in law (see, by analogy, judgment of 1 July 2008, Chronopost and La Poste v UFEX and Others, C-341/0",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "6c20d977141838c4aacc5c01899c38917ce13f74f38cb7dd12ff33f52dbfd284"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~c-603-13",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-603/13",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_143"
        ],
        "excerpt": "On the contrary, the latter has stated that the scope of judicial review provided for in Article 263 TFEU may, in certain cases, extend to all the evidence submitted by the appellants, whether that evidence pre-dates or post-dates the contested decision, whether it was previously submitted in the co",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "fdbf11ae33d7bde22ffb8fcc9d6994508d3b6b9469f707e98e437861846b93ea"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~c-71-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-71/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_121"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The appraisal of those facts and the assessment of that evidence thus do not, save where the facts or evidence are distorted, constitute a point of law which is subject, as such, to review by the Court of Justice on appeal (judgment of 1 August 2025, France and Commission v CWS Powder Coating and Ot",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "3934a03511757426e4bce0904956afbface6e87a3c5ed19534243d2311313f1d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~c-82-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-82/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_121"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The appraisal of those facts and the assessment of that evidence thus do not, save where the facts or evidence are distorted, constitute a point of law which is subject, as such, to review by the Court of Justice on appeal (judgment of 1 August 2025, France and Commission v CWS Powder Coating and Ot",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "32e6b99363caae7d54337c650a955d3840e391230d6c13ee9e4bb3f7b268eef5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~c-882-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-882/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-882/24 P,",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "a0da0279d1123739520fb46a5a0d08b793c41ba428318224cdbe37fe72cef36e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-882-24-p~cites~t-50-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-882-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-50/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_21",
          "para_224"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By his appeal, AL seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 April 2024, AL v Commission ( T-50/22 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2024:220 ), by which that court dismissed his action seeking annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 22 Octo",
        "decided": "2026-04-23",
        "hash": "829e373794bc2a14891b49fbcef58f696abb390af4bbfe65ef52580409eeb802"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 13,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-882-24-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "1f3dc37a20054e7bb8c5b9606d282a039f861893b575a96ea1557cb83706d061"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-882-24-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-882-24-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-882-24-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-882-24-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-882-24-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-882-24-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-882-24-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-882-24-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-882-24-p",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-882-24-p",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "node_state": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-882-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-882-24-p"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-882-24-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "1f3dc37a20054e7bb8c5b9606d282a039f861893b575a96ea1557cb83706d061",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:43fddd728f506883ed586bdb39759f7b22ddd9dee5f1dc4818f7b15e0697fd31",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-28",
  "expires": "2026-10-29T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-28+legal-2026-10-28+2026-10-28T10:10:35",
    "content_hash": "sha256:43fddd728f506883ed586bdb39759f7b22ddd9dee5f1dc4818f7b15e0697fd31",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-28T14:30:21.564Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-882-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}