{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-824-25-p","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-824-25-p)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-10-30","fingerprint":"ewai:se:6413f6","proof":"sha256:4ce60573b09b04464f5c2b7542edcb7f50b95d0d1124dc8335f7617677eb0b5b","jurisdiction":"se","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","object_type":"edge","object_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p","schema_version":"1","schema":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-824-25-p","judgment":{"id":"eu:c-824-25-p","text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-824-25-p"},"siblings":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-824-25-p","relation":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-824-25-p","change":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-824-25-p","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-824-25-p","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-824-25-p","status":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-824-25-p","precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-824-25-p","element":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-824-25-p","decision":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-824-25-p","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-824-25-p","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-824-25-p","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-824-25-p"},"source":"NovaCopilot","precedent_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-824-25-p","item":{"judgment":"eu:c-824-25-p","outgoing":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~overrules~t-87-00","type":"overrules","label_sv":"frångår","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"T-87/00","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_30"],"excerpt":"10 In that context, the appellant reiterates its claim that it is essential, with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law, that all courts within the European Union apply EU law as enacted by the EU legislature and interpret it in accordance with the case-law, without departing f","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"8013708912f0b561618ab9a57406a645eb2ad6913bf9acf7c221ee6e4f6fc042"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~follows~c-598-23","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-598/23","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_38"],"excerpt":"Although the appellant identifies the errors of law allegedly committed by the General Court, it does not explain to the requisite standard or, in any event, show how such errors of law, assuming that they are established, raise an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or ","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"c9c0a6b6da5f71d08dbae9b9c1e4cc7c48345daaf386d70a903b4df46aaa4d25"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~follows~c-613-19","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-613/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_35"],"excerpt":"14 A request that an appeal be allowed to proceed which does not contain the information mentioned in the preceding paragraph of the present order cannot be capable of demonstrating that the appeal raises an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law th","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"bc321130e1930011cb19960406069c1e0c77a4849339a9e78bd62e8dcc8441b2"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~follows~c-619-25","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-619/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_32","para_33","para_34","para_35","para_41"],"excerpt":"14 A request that an appeal be allowed to proceed which does not contain the information mentioned in the preceding paragraph of the present order cannot be capable of demonstrating that the appeal raises an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law th","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"34a319f8861f4c74acdcaaab397201b61e630783f97d4cfcf06bf0213917828e"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~follows~c-665-25","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-665/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_40"],"excerpt":"Although it identifies the contested paragraphs of the contested judgment and the relevant paragraphs of the judgments of the Court of Justice and the General Court on which it relies in support of its request that the appeal be allowed to proceed, the appellant does not provide, in breach of the re","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"0a4a52da37f6d508803f27b3f16cef2cda83c263d7656d714171a177d5d23a67"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~cites~c-292-04","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-292/04","id":"eu:c-292-04","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-292-04"},"paragraph_ids":["para_29"],"excerpt":"According to the appellant, it is apparent from the judgment of 6 March 2007, Meilicke and Others (C-292/04, EU:C:2007:132), and from the case-law cited therein, that, in application of the general principle of legal certainty which is inherent in the EU legal order, the Court of Justice may restric","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"f9165efb1a21be9b43cd740aabf6d7e89267c5bda4a9bfbf2c9d62d8363b1720"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~cites~c-382-21","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-382/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_32","para_33","para_34","para_37"],"excerpt":"11 As a preliminary point, it must be recalled that it is for the appellant to demonstrate that the issues raised by its appeal are significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law (orders of 10 December 2021, EUIPO v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann , C-382/21 P, EU:C:2","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"9eebea079f0095d85b7cf411f43b106785947b6fa2b9627de0a556ebad20558c"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~cites~c-439-19","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-439/19","id":"eu:c-439-19","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-439-19"},"paragraph_ids":["para_29"],"excerpt":"In that regard, the appellant refers to the judgment of 22 June 2021, Latvijas Republikas Saeima (Penalty points) (C-439/19, EU:C:2021:504), from which it is apparent that two conditions must be satisfied before such a restriction is imposed, namely that those concerned must have acted in good faith","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"4d424abd58b9fd95176df6f853fd023a23a53e3aaa635520b349d781b9aff32d"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~cites~c-605-22","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-605/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_39"],"excerpt":"18 Furthermore, in so far as the appellant seeks, by those arguments, to call into question the General Court’s assessment of certain facts, such arguments cannot demonstrate that the appeal raises an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law (order of","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"6238e01a8d0f8e47f25db17c1c732283364ce8d2e795f91dd4399463f7ffeccd"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~cites~c-824-25","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-824/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_4"],"excerpt":"In Case C-824/25 P,","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"2ffdab52aaa9dd5b32a53198f581a6222c805f5cbf07ec08251a6a8f27413088"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~cites~t-220-17","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"T-220/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_27","para_29"],"excerpt":"7 In the first place, the appellant claims, in essence, that the General Court erred in law, in paragraph 40 of the contested judgment, by giving an extensive interpretation to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94, based on the judgment of 26 April 2018, Pfalzmarkt für Obst und Gemüse v EUIPO (100","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"cad07aa87d6873d0548d3e1feef6c6cf6fed371687cbb493daebfd0a80d90036"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-824-25-p~cites~t-381-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-824-25-p","to":{"ref":"T-381/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_19"],"excerpt":"1 By its appeal, Frutaria Innovation SL asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 15 October 2025, Frutaria Innovation v EUIPO - Schneider (Frutaria) (T-381/24, ‘the contested judgment’, EU:T:2025:960), by which the General Court dismissed Frut","decided":"2026-04-14","hash":"c99cc09d94d77a8f07fbab9158b3081c45ba15b63e2683afdce750d0b07faa81"}],"incoming":[],"acts":[],"counts":{"outgoing":12,"incoming":0,"acts":0},"follow":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-824-25-p?follow=5","hash":"b949551da3fa031890a14e48f9cd1b511fc9e56a20b8f13939d5ac4cd558a849"},"links":{"provisions":null,"case_law":{"precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-824-25-p","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-824-25-p","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-824-25-p","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-824-25-p"},"compact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-824-25-p?view=compact","representations":{"sv":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-824-25-p","en":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-824-25-p"},"machine_languages":["en","sv"],"ref":"eu:c-824-25-p"},"watch":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-824-25-p","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-824-25-p","risk_changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes","node_state":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-824-25-p","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-824-25-p"},"metadata":{"schema":"novacopilot_object_metadata/1","canonical_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-824-25-p","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","official_source":null,"short_answer":null,"short_answer_status":"not_in_register","hash":"b949551da3fa031890a14e48f9cd1b511fc9e56a20b8f13939d5ac4cd558a849","schema_version":"1","last_verified_at":null,"verification_status":"not_verified_yet","integrity_check_scope":"stored_content_only"},"hash":"sha256:4ce60573b09b04464f5c2b7542edcb7f50b95d0d1124dc8335f7617677eb0b5b","version":"legal-2026-10-30","expires":"2026-10-31T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-10-30+legal-2026-10-30+2026-10-30T12:22:43","content_hash":"sha256:4ce60573b09b04464f5c2b7542edcb7f50b95d0d1124dc8335f7617677eb0b5b","revalidate_after":"2026-10-30T13:32:14.784Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-824-25-p","disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","withheld":{"links.evidence":3},"access":{"status":"partner_key_required","header":"x-partner-key","contact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt","note":"Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."},"access_class":"relationship","access_view":"public","freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-10-30T12:32:15.679Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu%3Ac-824-25-p","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":3939}}