{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-801-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:0d9fc4",
    "proof": "sha256:36f003c9ca50319531ffb43b2a71984706d485ab745a6a70b1b586fcb73ec49b",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-801-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-801-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-801-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-801-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-801-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-801-24-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~follows~c-413-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-413/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_278"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, that standard of proof has no bearing on the fact that the judicial review of the lawfulness of the reasons forming the basis of a decision to include or to maintain a person’s name on the list of persons subject to restrictive measures entails a verification of the factual allegations ",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "b9b75c56b818fb84bc3a9c6c14222217025dee7576656cb06199ad8e463e2065"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~follows~c-417-11",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-417/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_167",
          "para_169",
          "para_171",
          "para_173"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, the purpose of the obligation to state the reasons on which an act adversely affecting an individual is based, which is a corollary of the principle of respect for the rights of the defence, is, first, to provide the person concerned with sufficient information to make",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "e393bcf3491eef64d7d48bb4192c090036c5b252f23ecafc7767992217395a77"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~follows~c-490-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-490/24",
          "id": "eu:c-490-24",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-490-24"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_217"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, the meaning and scope of terms for which EU law provides no definition and in respect of which it makes no reference to the law of the Member States must be determined by reference to their usual meaning in everyday lang",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "aabae4c982af9ede5fb2e3a0a6d9774d1c5746a22cb4ff9e55e8d91cd5f907d6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~follows~c-494-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-494/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_261"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In accordance with settled case-law, it is apparent from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an a",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "c44da25be123d952981d5b662f92669eb9c7eba62cd552072a88f662c8910983"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~follows~c-581-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-581/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_261"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In accordance with settled case-law, it is apparent from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an a",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "bc1cb5d85f8b261160919402468b4d0f7a4c14d124196c4d698bf4af7b459f55"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~follows~c-708-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-708/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_278"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The standard of proof required by the Courts of the European Union in the field of restrictive measures is in line with the fact that those measures are precautionary, temporary and reversible and that their validity is always subject to the continuing existence of the factual and legal circumstance",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "666acc0c44d4e53d3827d436e167f292c062a818f256e15d54b349954e5441b8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~follows~c-72-15",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-72/15",
          "id": "eu:c-72-15",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-72-15"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_206",
          "para_233",
          "para_363"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it is sufficient to note, as the General Court did in paragraph 139 of the judgment under appeal, that, since the objective pursued by the Council when it adopted those measures was to reduce the revenue of the Russian State and to put pressure on the Russian Government, in order to ",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "0929a706289757f652bbadff7cb3955bf81b06c95076ccdcb3f09260064f77bd"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-266-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-266/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_204",
          "para_215"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, the appellant submits, in the first place, that the judgment of 7 April 2016, Central Bank of Iran v Council ( C-266/15 P , EU:C:2016:208 , paragraph 44 ), on which the General Court relied, by analogy, in paragraph 57 of the judgment under appeal, for the purposes of interpreting th",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "d00d6a79a71c35806ef005f70b96a9cb754023d073650d42388f7e94cda6c447"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-314-13",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-314/13",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_326"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, in paragraphs 132 and 133 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court held, correctly, that, where a national authority decides on a request to release frozen funds pursuant to the derogations laid down by Decision 2014/145 and Regulation No 269/2014, it is required to observe the C",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "ed1ac5e79265f5748e6cceccd9584ca64bbf91825e83d8af6b2e1ed733f01b5d"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-330-15",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-330/15",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_270"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be noted, first, that the case-law referred to originated in the case-law of the Court of Justice (see, inter alia, judgments of 21 April 2015, Anbouba v Council, C-605/13 P , EU:C:2015:248 , paragraphs 52 and 54 ; of 28 July 2016, Tomana and Others v Council and Commission",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "aad7f9914e2c84724b17248f73c66f3135262e1a1f104391052a9b2b0c25f55e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-46-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-46/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_171"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is not necessary for the reasoning to go into all the relevant facts and points of law or to provide a detailed answer to the considerations set out by the person concerned when consulted prior to the adoption of that same act, since the question whether the statement of reasons is sufficient mus",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "fe63ff5129fd60dd22a80fd5ef23b9bfd02c6d7c2a352cd7e7193c53a76ac663"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-50-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-50/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_307"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That said, an appellant is entitled to lodge an appeal relying, before the Court of Justice, on grounds and arguments which arise from the judgment under appeal itself and seek to criticise, in law, its correctness (judgment of 6 October 2021, Sigma Alimentos Exterior v Commission, C-50/19 P , EU:C:",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "c2fef48a6781dbb8c6c3bae7ce8411c4bf8f37aaf7ad9137eb9f892b91dc6341"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-535-14",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-535/14",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_191"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows that objections and arguments intended to establish that an act is not well founded are irrelevant in the context of a ground of appeal alleging an inadequate statement of reasons or a lack of such a statement (judgment of 18 June 2015, Ipatau v Council, C-535/14 P , EU:C:2015:407 , parag",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "e4ac9dc15302570f24be9095c08a8ee5d71d289ef3e927dde26e2fdf8d33dd2f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-562-12",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-562/12",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_336"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Last, as regards the appellant’s argument that the derogations laid down by Regulation No 269/2014 have not enabled its customers to obtain the release of their funds or economic resources as a result of overly restrictive conditions imposed by the national authorities or because those authorities w",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "723f0451f554d4943923a2f0f6919b3fb6096cb0ff23582a3debd82e97acf621"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-605-13",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-605/13",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_270"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be noted, first, that the case-law referred to originated in the case-law of the Court of Justice (see, inter alia, judgments of 21 April 2015, Anbouba v Council, C-605/13 P , EU:C:2015:248 , paragraphs 52 and 54 ; of 28 July 2016, Tomana and Others v Council and Commission",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "fd6b8848a4929862c5663326dc19a07d42cbde9aa1b5cb4812708a968e5bed6a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-702-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-702/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_270"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be noted, first, that the case-law referred to originated in the case-law of the Court of Justice (see, inter alia, judgments of 21 April 2015, Anbouba v Council, C-605/13 P , EU:C:2015:248 , paragraphs 52 and 54 ; of 28 July 2016, Tomana and Others v Council and Commission",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "4f4210ff6cf1515c21c29c8ba46ebd55baadfdce86a4f34b13540212370f896c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-732-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-732/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_359"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to the case-law, the legality of restrictive measures is not dependent on their being found to have immediate effects; all that is required is that they are not manifestly inappropriate in regard to the objective that the competent institution seeks to pursue (judgment of 17 September 2020",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "cf93dc7b411c0820d09feb85006e4d82d3170ea81768c881fc685d8646b1777e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~c-801-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-801/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-801/24 P,",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "2fb2ae98a7b3f6566b17e6da69783827e14c8a21ba5d0898bc188c1f18e26533"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-801-24-p~cites~t-494-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-801-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-494/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_23"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By its appeal, NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) seeks the setting aside of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 11 September 2024, NSD v Council ( T-494/22 , the judgment under appeal, EU:T:2024:607 ), by which the General Court dismissed its action seeking annulment",
        "decided": "2026-06-11",
        "hash": "9d83328e291cc823182209633ac0a8b6ca32a41a14082de3cc1e05de98b81deb"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 19,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-801-24-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "f709e876dcf219b6803f05b462b6de57518b2227abbb77b7cef174508f324f30"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-801-24-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-801-24-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-801-24-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-801-24-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-801-24-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-801-24-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-801-24-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-801-24-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-801-24-p",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-801-24-p",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-801-24-p"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-801-24-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "f709e876dcf219b6803f05b462b6de57518b2227abbb77b7cef174508f324f30",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:36f003c9ca50319531ffb43b2a71984706d485ab745a6a70b1b586fcb73ec49b",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
  "expires": "2026-10-27T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-25+legal-2026-10-25+2026-10-25T13:37:31",
    "content_hash": "sha256:36f003c9ca50319531ffb43b2a71984706d485ab745a6a70b1b586fcb73ec49b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-26T07:16:41.867Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-801-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}