{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-766-25-p","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-766-25-p)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-11-01","fingerprint":"ewai:se:21f704","proof":"sha256:d58b4f6446241209607c88f1be7e0aeef69556230caa818e8934c32e728b1940","jurisdiction":"se","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","object_type":"edge","object_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p","schema_version":"1","schema":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-766-25-p","judgment":{"id":"eu:c-766-25-p","text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-766-25-p"},"siblings":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-766-25-p","relation":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-766-25-p","change":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-766-25-p","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-766-25-p","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-766-25-p","status":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-766-25-p","precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-766-25-p","element":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-766-25-p","decision":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-766-25-p","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-766-25-p","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-766-25-p","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-766-25-p"},"source":"NovaCopilot","precedent_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-766-25-p","item":{"judgment":"eu:c-766-25-p","outgoing":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~follows~c-32-25","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-32/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_44"],"excerpt":"23 As regards the line of argument set out in paragraph 12 above, in so far as the appellant relies on the General Court’s failure to have regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice, it must be found that, although it identifies the disputed paragraphs of the judgment under appeal and the paragr","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"920dd0b7ffd37f419775bd0d941c21c602d01787654adb4294a6bf6591d7e6c2"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~follows~c-382-21","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-382/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_27","para_32","para_36","para_37","para_38"],"excerpt":"12 In the sixth place, the appellant maintains that, in paragraphs 50, 54 and 60 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court, failing to comply with the case-law established in the judgment of 27 February 2024, EUIPO v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann (C-382/21 P, EU:C:2024:172, paragraph 70),","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"d6218b2c125598c1b022542ac8972e2bec70b8736407ab22ca8b65aa77c4a6b9"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~follows~c-605-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-605/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_41","para_44"],"excerpt":"The appellant also does not indicate the extent to which an error of the type alleged had an effect on the outcome of the judgment under appeal, which does not satisfy the requirements set out in paragraph 17 above (see, to that effect, order of 8 March 2023, Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González v EUI","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"a41ba53ccbf65026acc8d3ebab7605eb1dee7c9406fdf99bd19d596496a3df43"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~follows~c-665-25","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-665/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_36","para_37","para_38","para_39","para_41","para_45"],"excerpt":"Even though the appellant identifies the disputed paragraphs of the judgment under appeal and the relevant paragraphs of the judgments of the General Court on which it relies in support of its request that the appeal be allowed to proceed, it does not provide - thus failing to satisfy the requiremen","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"dba3338eaa87a5a95192a4428a1e37236e873e62661e32eda17c6d359e7ada77"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~cites~c-610-25","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-610/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_43"],"excerpt":"In order to demonstrate that that is the case, it is necessary to establish both the existence and significance of such issues by means of concrete evidence specific to the particular case, and not simply arguments of a general nature (order of 15 December 2025, Abacus Research v EUIPO , C-610/25 P,","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"21097ca2428d37de786588c830dd744fcf6cfc2dfacda4e52d6d0919f31aac2f"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~cites~c-613-19","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-613/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_39"],"excerpt":"18 A request that an appeal be allowed to proceed which does not contain the information referred to in the preceding paragraph of the present order cannot be capable of demonstrating that the appeal raises an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law ","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"f04a28bbf7a7194490739555bfcab8a3254d7893e79ab366ee195e240b010f87"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~cites~c-766-25","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-766/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_4"],"excerpt":"In Case C-766/25 P,","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"c83e59227ac0c428e8e85033d0eaf2fb47592117b898ef1b77677d81f033c86d"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~cites~t-128-99","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"T-128/99","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_30","para_33"],"excerpt":"10 In the fourth place, the appellant maintains that, in paragraph 66 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court has not complied with its own case-law, as set out in the judgment of 15 November 2001, Signal Communications v OHIM (TELEYE) (T-128/99, EU:T:2001:266, paragraph 42), in which, in re","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"25cb6b400ed55bef80df604163eb358e5cbbfe754d5f77863714e8e82a4183b1"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~cites~t-186-12","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"T-186/12","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_28"],"excerpt":"8 In the second place, the appellant criticises the General Court for erring in law, in paragraph 36 of the judgment under appeal, since it based its reasoning, in proceedings concerning relative grounds for refusal of registration of an EU trade mark, on judgment of 25 June 2015, Copernicus-Tradema","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"05bad6b34146170254d440030ccfad8bb746213618582e7c154bd051a00321ac"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-766-25-p~cites~t-562-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-766-25-p","to":{"ref":"T-562/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_19"],"excerpt":"1 By its appeal, Capella EOOD seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 October 2025, Capella v EUIPO - Richemont International (COLORATURA) (T-562/24, ‘the judgment under appeal’, EU:T:2025:940), whereby the General Court dismissed its action seeking annul","decided":"2026-03-24","hash":"16afe55c3028af5afa089f36b4ac019e4622d8fa3cf7f773199835eb60b0326a"}],"incoming":[],"acts":[],"counts":{"outgoing":10,"incoming":0,"acts":0},"follow":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-766-25-p?follow=5","hash":"1d791d090177a42b32ddb608865882d0991e385884eb0217aaf5b426986d6f41"},"links":{"provisions":null,"case_law":{"precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-766-25-p","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-766-25-p","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-766-25-p","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-766-25-p"},"compact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-766-25-p?view=compact","representations":{"sv":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-766-25-p","en":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-766-25-p"},"machine_languages":["en","sv"],"ref":"eu:c-766-25-p"},"watch":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-766-25-p","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-766-25-p","risk_changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes","node_state":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-766-25-p","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-766-25-p"},"metadata":{"schema":"novacopilot_object_metadata/1","canonical_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-766-25-p","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","official_source":null,"short_answer":null,"short_answer_status":"not_in_register","hash":"1d791d090177a42b32ddb608865882d0991e385884eb0217aaf5b426986d6f41","schema_version":"1","last_verified_at":null,"verification_status":"not_verified_yet","integrity_check_scope":"stored_content_only"},"hash":"sha256:d58b4f6446241209607c88f1be7e0aeef69556230caa818e8934c32e728b1940","version":"legal-2026-11-01","expires":"2026-11-02T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-11-01+legal-2026-11-01+2026-11-01T21:30:36","content_hash":"sha256:d58b4f6446241209607c88f1be7e0aeef69556230caa818e8934c32e728b1940","revalidate_after":"2026-11-01T23:31:06.433Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-766-25-p","disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","withheld":{"links.evidence":3},"access":{"status":"partner_key_required","header":"x-partner-key","contact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt","note":"Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."},"access_class":"relationship","access_view":"public","freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-11-01T22:31:06.914Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu%3Ac-766-25-p","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":3532}}