{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-748-24",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-748-24)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:7f36e1",
    "proof": "sha256:468f6a47c7642cdf9772ef921d9cd12d3319112a65b7d03f7e4ae486ce12c3ad",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-748-24",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-748-24",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-748-24"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-748-24",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-748-24",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-748-24",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-748-24",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-748-24",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-748-24",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-748-24",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-748-24",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-748-24",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-748-24",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-748-24",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-748-24"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-748-24",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-748-24",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~distinguishes~c-653-19",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-653/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_95",
          "para_100",
          "para_101"
        ],
        "excerpt": "42 In the context of that minimal harmonisation, that directive distinguishes between judicial decisions on guilt, which necessarily occur at the conclusion of the criminal proceedings, and other procedural acts, such as acts of the prosecution and preliminary decisions of a procedural nature (see, ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "1b4ade5a6152ecf8af7a3d5a47d0ff87e673b494ecc87d69ec324e22a511435e"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~follows~c-173-09",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-173/09",
          "id": "eu:c-173-09",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-173-09"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_145"
        ],
        "excerpt": "91 In that context it must be noted, in addition, that EU law precludes a national court which is called upon to decide a case referred back to it by a higher court hearing an appeal from being bound, in accordance with national procedural law, by legal rulings of the higher court, if it considers, ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "66203a5786f19ab8040bd4ffbc91c9a182381e929e1e36266d665ae2dc1a2b69"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~follows~c-310-18",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-310/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_94",
          "para_104"
        ],
        "excerpt": "41 In order to determine the scope of those provisions as regards the examination which may be carried out by a criminal court in a situation such as that referred to in the first three questions, it must be borne in mind, at the outset, that Directive 2016/343 provides only for minimal harmonisatio",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "e08f0a57b02f0be6ad02b72659893e7f6c624277f413014a12a9bae39e1ee599"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~follows~c-369-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-369/23",
          "id": "eu:c-369-23",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-369-23"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_119"
        ],
        "excerpt": "66 Although it is ultimately for the referring court to determine whether Article 4(1) of Directive 2016/343, read in conjunction with Article 48(1) of the Charter, was complied with in the course of the proceedings before the appeal court, the Court may, however, in the context of the judicial coop",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "e311f35f7df5f622971358270d7ef7189409ef1771ad5219f0cc41db6d7cba32"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~follows~c-377-18",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-377/18",
          "id": "eu:c-377-18",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-377-18"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_109",
          "para_110",
          "para_111",
          "para_112",
          "para_114",
          "para_117",
          "para_118"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows, in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter, that it is necessary to take account of Article 6(2) ECHR for the purpose of interpreting Article 48(1) of the Charter, as a minimum threshold of protection (see, to that effect, judgment of 5 September 2019, AH and Others (Presumption of ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "9320651f4c02b49f73451c18fac73b1f6d8ff31fb347b24955a47700f86b49c2"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~follows~c-430-21",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-430/21",
          "id": "eu:c-430-21",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-430-21"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_144",
          "para_145"
        ],
        "excerpt": "90 Since Article 3 is sufficiently clear, precise and unconditional to confer on it direct effect, it is for the referring court, in accordance with the principle of the primacy of EU law, to disapply, where appropriate, national legislation which would prevent its application in the case before it ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "a338180a28b8aa3159703d4050702bdd13104f9b7f17b983dfbe832a834fbff3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~cites~c-107-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-107/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_78",
          "para_79"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Consequently, where the questions submitted concern the interpretation of EU law, the Court is in principle bound to give a ruling (see judgments of 21 April 1988, Pardini , 338/85, EU:C:1988:194, paragraph 8, and of 24 July 2023, Lin , C-107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606, paragraph 61).",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "8c1935f4a7b181eb51e4a7177528049b5c1c0b3c648bd5c608066dd5bed23579"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~cites~c-116-00",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-116/00",
          "id": "eu:c-116-00",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-116-00"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_80"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, it is essential, as stated in Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure, that the request for a preliminary ruling itself contain a statement of the reasons which prompted the referring court or tribunal to enquire about the interpretation or validity of certain provisions of EU law, and ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "a7815346e1897d81cc14f8fd164360204f3776acdf35363137e3ebf90af1a37a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~cites~c-320-90",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-320/90",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_80"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, it is essential, as stated in Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure, that the request for a preliminary ruling itself contain a statement of the reasons which prompted the referring court or tribunal to enquire about the interpretation or validity of certain provisions of EU law, and ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "0b7b80831681c6031a748b91ebd25c625d7cee5e7ef9808f934b5c09bd25c75f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~cites~c-322-90",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-322/90",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_80"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, it is essential, as stated in Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure, that the request for a preliminary ruling itself contain a statement of the reasons which prompted the referring court or tribunal to enquire about the interpretation or validity of certain provisions of EU law, and ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "5ec27c6430f05f37ad188fb69b1396793500b153cf5820844b6e8499a10533fc"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~cites~c-351-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-351/23",
          "id": "eu:c-351-23-62023cj0351",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-351-23-62023cj0351"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_138"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Nonetheless, those measures must meet the dual requirement that they should be no less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (principle of equivalence) and should not make it in practice impossible or excessively difficult to exercise the rights conferred by EU law (principle of e",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "28753922e84b9cc0f6e9ed1e399980ff56fdc16d990a1928e06814e02df4712c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~cites~c-36-99",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-36/99",
          "id": "eu:c-36-99",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-36-99"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_79"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The Court may refuse to rule on a question referred by a national court for a preliminary ruling only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of EU law that is sought bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its purpose, where the problem is hypothetical, or where the Co",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "5b995b2e1dfb01aa1cba1adfc8406192eacd0511a504845eedad4bbbbb44ed50"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-748-24~cites~c-548-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-748-24",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-548/21",
          "id": "eu:c-548-21-62021cj0548",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-548-21-62021cj0548"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_80"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Furthermore, it is essential, as stated in Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure, that the request for a preliminary ruling itself contain a statement of the reasons which prompted the referring court or tribunal to enquire about the interpretation or validity of certain provisions of EU law, and ",
        "decided": "2026-04-30",
        "hash": "fcc912f3bd36b892afa849b50d1f2fc763fe431d1afa289881ba7201c39c4096"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-503-25~cites~c-748-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-503-25",
        "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-503-25",
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_112"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The Court may refuse to rule on a question referred by a national court for a preliminary ruling only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of EU law that is sought bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its purpose, where the problem is hypothetical, or where the Co"
      }
    ],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 13,
      "incoming": 1,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-748-24?follow=5",
    "hash": "6584ace1710f8f01030db5411fb2b64b81f88eed5631fd876a86c6611bf2cb92"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-748-24",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-748-24",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-748-24",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-748-24"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-748-24?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-748-24",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-748-24"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-748-24"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-748-24",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-748-24",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-748-24"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-748-24",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "6584ace1710f8f01030db5411fb2b64b81f88eed5631fd876a86c6611bf2cb92",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:468f6a47c7642cdf9772ef921d9cd12d3319112a65b7d03f7e4ae486ce12c3ad",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-25",
  "expires": "2026-10-27T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-25+legal-2026-10-25+2026-10-25T13:37:31",
    "content_hash": "sha256:468f6a47c7642cdf9772ef921d9cd12d3319112a65b7d03f7e4ae486ce12c3ad",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-26T08:42:55.233Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-748-24",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}