{ "attribution": { "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com", "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-621-15", "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-621-15)", "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision", "version": "legal-2026-10-24", "fingerprint": "ewai:se:3559fa", "proof": "sha256:82d5bc7e76af513e6af4257fd6ec966ee76e0bbb33349e110676e1ea031cf9c2", "jurisdiction": "se", "lang": "en", "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal", "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om" }, "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "object_type": "edge", "object_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15", "schema_version": "1", "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-621-15", "judgment": { "id": "eu:c-621-15", "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-621-15" }, "siblings": { "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-621-15", "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-621-15", "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-621-15", "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-621-15", "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-621-15", "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-621-15", "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-621-15", "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-621-15", "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-621-15", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-621-15", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-621-15", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-621-15" }, "source": "NovaCopilot", "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-621-15", "item": { "judgment": "eu:c-621-15", "outgoing": [ { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~follows~c-150-05", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-150/05", "id": "eu:c-150-05", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-150-05" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_91" ], "excerpt": "40 According to settled case-law, the Court may, however, in the framework of the judicial cooperation provided for by that article and on the basis of the material presented to it, provide the national court with an interpretation of EU law which may be useful to it in assessing the effects of such", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "251ef1b88e58e9e922c4bc741b9a1daa2b3e98e734fb753e654eba853cfc3036" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~follows~c-173-03", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-173/03", "id": "eu:c-173-03", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-173-03" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_100" ], "excerpt": "Similarly, it should be noted that when a court, like the referring court in the present case, is called upon to rule at final instance, it is responsible inter alia for ensuring, on a nationwide scale, uniform interpretation of the legal rules (see, to that effect, judgment of 13 June 2006, Traghet", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "098a14fe61e0735ddc7373b887d99e84c738c8cc2ffd462ee0d835d2160f4d69" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~follows~c-276-01", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-276/01", "id": "eu:c-276-01", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-276-01" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_77" ], "excerpt": "26 Regarding more specifically the principle of effectiveness, it requires, in terms of the detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding rights which individuals derive directly from EU law, that those rules do not render practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise o", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "96a49ab597683fb43824f7d17d33ed2fcbe78798bb74d9661fc5218e29c06887" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~follows~c-310-13", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-310/13", "id": null, "url": null }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_71", "para_72", "para_75", "para_78", "para_80" ], "excerpt": "20 Similarly, it must be remembered that, according to settled case-law, Directive 85/374 seeks to achieve, in the matters regulated by it, complete harmonisation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States (judgment of 20 November 2014, Novo Nordisk Pharma , C-310/13", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "255eada57d4fdb7a6df1880e3b89c72d5dfc72b76119571b1232ae67f5c23d2c" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~follows~c-343-96", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-343/96", "id": "eu:c-343-96", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-343-96" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_87", "para_101" ], "excerpt": "This holds true inter alia for national provisions on proof (see, to that effect, judgment of 9 February 1999, Dilexport , C-343/96, EU:C:1999:59, paragraph 51 and the case-law cited) and for rules demarcating the respective jurisdictions of national courts.", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "16a8b3cc8219b7478baddba78d553accce1660473b8aa03767c6d0943dfb84e1" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~follows~c-503-13", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-503/13", "id": null, "url": null }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_74", "para_83", "para_92" ], "excerpt": "32 Such a limitation as to the types of admissible evidence would also be inconsistent with the objectives pursued by Directive 85/374, seeking to ensure, in particular, as is apparent from the second and seventh recitals thereof, a fair apportionment of the risks inherent in modern technological pr", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "e2e31a454463fbebb379b9c2284730ab2ecde0a0296c61264f076399ac160b46" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~follows~c-504-13", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-504/13", "id": null, "url": null }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_74", "para_83", "para_92" ], "excerpt": "32 Such a limitation as to the types of admissible evidence would also be inconsistent with the objectives pursued by Directive 85/374, seeking to ensure, in particular, as is apparent from the second and seventh recitals thereof, a fair apportionment of the risks inherent in modern technological pr", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "7b791afabb5180e8467ae5ced67ee24f080bb345ef076fb0a047b0aebb1b55b8" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~cites~c-129-00", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-129/00", "id": "eu:c-129-00", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-129-00" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_84" ], "excerpt": "33 Although, as shown by the discussion in paragraphs 28 to 32 of this judgment, national evidentiary rules such as those described in paragraph 28 above, which are ostensibly neutral as to the burden of proof referred to in Article 4 of Directive 85/374 and, in principle, capable of preserving the ", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "fe2774d06dffd1e0d36ebf3be70a2d9f986ffd1e452131ea3d1083b7e0dfa76f" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~cites~c-310-14", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-310/14", "id": "eu:c-310-14", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-310-14" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_76", "para_86" ], "excerpt": "25 In those circumstances, under the principle of procedural autonomy and subject to the principles of equivalency and effectiveness, it is for the national legal order of each Member State to establish the ways in which evidence is to be elicited, what evidence is to be admissible before the approp", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "107721cccab91cd8172493f48d80d82f6f07fec835e6885749ccc024dc90d8db" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~cites~c-358-08", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-358/08", "id": "eu:c-358-08", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-358-08" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_102" ], "excerpt": "50 As regards national provisions on proof, covered by the first question, it must nevertheless be emphasised that the national courts called on to apply them must take account of both the principles referred to in paragraphs 37 and 38 of this judgment and of the principle of legal certainty, the co", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "17d02fa0914bab5c1624faa7b6dc5e23424bf2e00d627ae57131bc6bcdb0f673" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-621-15~cites~c-74-14", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-621-15", "to": { "ref": "C-74/14", "id": "eu:c-74-14", "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-74-14" }, "paragraph_ids": [ "para_76" ], "excerpt": "25 In those circumstances, under the principle of procedural autonomy and subject to the principles of equivalency and effectiveness, it is for the national legal order of each Member State to establish the ways in which evidence is to be elicited, what evidence is to be admissible before the approp", "decided": "2017-06-21", "hash": "a7a6be54a957f7637e95980ae9498af85576e5d777d3b183c6734b4046ba2b08" } ], "incoming": [ { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-131-24~follows~c-621-15", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-131-24", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-131-24", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_151", "para_153" ], "excerpt": "50 In that regard, under the principle of procedural autonomy and subject to the principles of equivalency and effectiveness, it is for the national legal order of each Member State to establish the ways in which evidence is to be elicited, what evidence is to be admissible before the appropriate na" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-299-22~follows~c-621-15", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-299-22", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-299-22", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_179", "para_181" ], "excerpt": "Admittedly, in the absence, in Directive 2015/2302, of provisions on the rules of evidence in relation to the occurrence of ‘unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances’, within the meaning of Article 12(2) of the directive, it is, under the principle of procedural autonomy and subject to the princi" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-338-24~follows~c-621-15", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-338-24", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-338-24", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_168", "para_170" ], "excerpt": "In those circumstances, pursuant to the principle of procedural autonomy and subject to the principles of equivalence and effectiveness, it is for the national legal order of each Member State to determine the rules affording full and proper compensation for persons injured by a defective product (s" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-46-17~follows~c-621-15", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-46-17", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-46-17", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_154" ], "excerpt": "However, the Court may, in the framework of the judicial cooperation provided for by that article and on the basis of the material presented to it, provide the national court with an interpretation of EU law which may be useful to it in assessing the effects of one or other of its provisions (see, t" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-632-18~follows~c-621-15", "type": "follows", "label_sv": "följer", "from": "eu:c-632-18", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-632-18", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_224" ], "excerpt": "In that regard, it should be recalled that, in accordance with settled case-law of the Court, in the context of the procedure provided for in Article 267 TFEU, which is based on a clear separation of functions between the national courts and the Court of Justice, the latter does not have jurisdictio" }, { "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-86-20-62020cj0086~cites~c-621-15", "type": "cites", "label_sv": "hänvisar till", "from": "eu:c-86-20-62020cj0086", "from_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-86-20-62020cj0086", "paragraph_ids": [ "para_292", "para_294" ], "excerpt": "In so far as those regulations do not contain more specific provisions relating, in particular, to the production of evidence, under the principle of procedural autonomy and subject to the principles of equivalency and effectiveness, it is for the national legal order of each Member State to establi" } ], "acts": [], "counts": { "outgoing": 11, "incoming": 6, "acts": 0 }, "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-621-15?follow=5", "hash": "7b1a020b4b0c8735090864f9ab075a25828b62b75e0e4a6b4a9b2a9d34b10b95" }, "links": { "provisions": null, "case_law": { "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-621-15", "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-621-15", "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-621-15", "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-621-15" }, "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-621-15?view=compact", "representations": { "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-621-15", "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-621-15" }, "machine_languages": [ "en", "sv" ], "ref": "eu:c-621-15" }, "watch": { "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-621-15", "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-621-15", "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes", "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-621-15" }, "metadata": { "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1", "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-621-15", "source": "Source: NovaCopilot", "official_source": null, "short_answer": null, "short_answer_status": "not_in_register", "hash": "7b1a020b4b0c8735090864f9ab075a25828b62b75e0e4a6b4a9b2a9d34b10b95", "schema_version": "1", "last_verified_at": null, "verification_status": "not_verified_yet", "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only" }, "hash": "sha256:82d5bc7e76af513e6af4257fd6ec966ee76e0bbb33349e110676e1ea031cf9c2", "version": "legal-2026-10-24", "expires": "2026-10-25T00:00:00.000Z", "dependency": { "index_version": "legal-2026-10-24+legal-2026-10-24+2026-10-24T16:40:06", "content_hash": "sha256:82d5bc7e76af513e6af4257fd6ec966ee76e0bbb33349e110676e1ea031cf9c2", "revalidate_after": "2026-10-24T19:25:29.834Z", "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600, "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred", "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency", "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify", "stale_copy_invalid": true }, "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-621-15", "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.", "content_notice": { "legal_advice": false, "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.", "kinds": { "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted", "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text", "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer" }, "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.", "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections", "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration" }, "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering", "withheld": { "links.evidence": 3 }, "access": { "status": "partner_key_required", "header": "x-partner-key", "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt", "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot." }, "access_class": "relationship", "access_view": "public" }