{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-566-25-p","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-566-25-p)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-11-02","fingerprint":"ewai:se:d4beae","proof":"sha256:14291c76f69694c109941bc50372d34fb9885f2a4648dab69897c939e3a00841","jurisdiction":"se","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","object_type":"edge","object_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p","schema_version":"1","schema":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-566-25-p","judgment":{"id":"eu:c-566-25-p","text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-566-25-p"},"siblings":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-566-25-p","relation":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-566-25-p","change":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-566-25-p","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-566-25-p","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-566-25-p","status":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-566-25-p","precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-566-25-p","element":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-566-25-p","decision":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-566-25-p","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-566-25-p","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-566-25-p","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-566-25-p"},"source":"NovaCopilot","precedent_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-566-25-p","item":{"judgment":"eu:c-566-25-p","outgoing":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-136-24","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-136/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_72"],"excerpt":"29 In accordance with the case-law referred to, in essence, by the General Court in paragraph 55 of the order under appeal, the European Union may incur non-contractual liability under the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU only if a number of conditions are fulfilled, namely the existence of a su","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"58e604d09a73381cd4d88da98865ae164418820b8cf90f7c135f496805e3cb43"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-138-17","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-138/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_73"],"excerpt":"30 It is also apparent from the case-law referred to in the preceding paragraph that, if any one of those conditions is not satisfied, the action must be dismissed in its entirety and it is unnecessary to consider the other conditions for non-contractual liability on the part of the European Union, ","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"95524ea4aa4c0fff2e04641fc5eb637436f067f5e2a422f5c6826a156cf16de0"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-146-17","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-146/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_73"],"excerpt":"30 It is also apparent from the case-law referred to in the preceding paragraph that, if any one of those conditions is not satisfied, the action must be dismissed in its entirety and it is unnecessary to consider the other conditions for non-contractual liability on the part of the European Union, ","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"a0f424de0f1509fe8780ce261d3ac82ccdd29676ed50372c2d4d10c871122c90"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-176-21","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-176/21","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_98"],"excerpt":"It is for that applicant to adduce conclusive proof as to both the existence and extent of the damage which he or she alleges, and to establish that the damage on which he or she relies affects him or her personally (see, to that effect, judgments of 9 November 1989, Briantex and Di Domenico v EEC a","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"82d0ef1dcf5a841c4a265b6b2c4e02c7c2e6bd6717a565d5d2c366446ba49998"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-257-98","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-257/98","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_68","para_73","para_77"],"excerpt":"30 It is also apparent from the case-law referred to in the preceding paragraph that, if any one of those conditions is not satisfied, the action must be dismissed in its entirety and it is unnecessary to consider the other conditions for non-contractual liability on the part of the European Union, ","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"46b23ad44e696bb816d2513fdcf8feb020707ce9429abf3acafb395b5bb67356"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-297-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-297/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_73"],"excerpt":"30 It is also apparent from the case-law referred to in the preceding paragraph that, if any one of those conditions is not satisfied, the action must be dismissed in its entirety and it is unnecessary to consider the other conditions for non-contractual liability on the part of the European Union, ","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"b7910df17387883b93549b52500e3954a08f73bec25d2dc96bf09f678a696bbf"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-346-17","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-346/17","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_98"],"excerpt":"It is for that applicant to adduce conclusive proof as to both the existence and extent of the damage which he or she alleges, and to establish that the damage on which he or she relies affects him or her personally (see, to that effect, judgments of 9 November 1989, Briantex and Di Domenico v EEC a","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"4628a3d550298d98a0c017c55862247c5b701d3ca753f12ec62ebd83a91cfc30"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-575-14","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-575/14","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_106"],"excerpt":"60 As regards the fact that the appellant has produced before the Court of Justice the ‘official report’ in question, it is sufficient to recall that an offer of evidence submitted for the first time before the Court of Justice, when it could have been presented before the General Court, must be reg","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"09f1a3aa976d1166692b425cddf9222af16e7c859a3212ccf35d1865bc2875db"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~follows~c-679-23","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-679/23","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_72","para_74"],"excerpt":"29 In accordance with the case-law referred to, in essence, by the General Court in paragraph 55 of the order under appeal, the European Union may incur non-contractual liability under the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU only if a number of conditions are fulfilled, namely the existence of a su","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"4779a14ae71fe4a3b32e8c5cb95d4ca822b29e3880dc10ea832e892ba7160675"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-146-91","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-146/91","id":"eu:c-146-91","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-146-91"},"paragraph_ids":["para_68","para_76"],"excerpt":"26 While acknowledging that it follows from the case-law of the Court of Justice, in particular from the judgment of 9 September 1999, Lucaccioni v Commission (C-257/98 P, EU:C:1999:402, paragraph 13), that the EU Courts are not obliged to examine in a particular order the three conditions for the E","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"7dfbd5fc5be5dce5bfe87ab510b64362533864506ac824cf99e342cccb7fc0e7"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-239-12","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-239/12","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_80"],"excerpt":"37 Fourth, while it is true, as follows from paragraph 72 of the judgment of 28 May 2013, Abdulrahim v Council and Commission (C-239/12 P, EU:C:2013:331), that the recognition, in the judgments or orders of the Court of Justice or of the General Court, of the unlawfulness of an act or conduct of an ","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"991942db4a4fad5b3610e5d589dc9d46642648e29accda83a3b9fde787f47e3a"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-419-08","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-419/08","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_77"],"excerpt":"34 Second, the fact that, in the present case, the appellant claims to have suffered non-material damage cannot call into question the case-law referred to in paragraph 30 of the present order since that case-law has already been applied in cases in which non-material damage was alleged without the ","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"8d359ba46674e18e56ecef8730027582112d3331ed33e7637c20b7f329b25ff5"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-448-23","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-448/23","id":"eu:c-448-23","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-448-23"},"paragraph_ids":["para_81"],"excerpt":"38 As regards, fifth, the fact that the case-law or the practice of courts or of tribunals or international organisations other than the Court of Justice have enshrined the priority nature of the examination of the condition relating to the unlawfulness of the conduct complained of, suffice it to no","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"4b4999a987bb5079e7ac5966c0f8f77a76c30c9b39730b9b611a1ecc67483a4a"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-481-07","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-481/07","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_89","para_107"],"excerpt":"44 In particular, he argues, the General Court failed to take account of the case-law of the Court of Justice according to which it is not necessary, in order to establish the reality of non-material damage, to submit an offer of evidence to that effect, provided that the applicant establishes that ","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"deba40045355367332f3d0d62cda88810d16d1baa01bf00ef7655ccfefc9fdf0"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-566-25","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-566/25","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_4"],"excerpt":"In Case C-566/25 P,","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"1b8c65625304ab382fbf9446cd2605942a45701da8249314be9097c2261da67b"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-777-22","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-777/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_94"],"excerpt":"48 It follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested parag","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"df22337255ea9e5e2d4504745548c918c7dfd9ae080e3a7acf83802fa7994809"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~c-789-22","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"C-789/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_94"],"excerpt":"48 It follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court that an appeal must indicate precisely the contested parag","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"37c099acffe9d9141c4bc9eceb31efe08fee891fd177ee8567975349fcee5013"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-566-25-p~cites~t-484-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-566-25-p","to":{"ref":"T-484/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_22"],"excerpt":"1 By his appeal, FF asks the Court of Justice to set aside in part the order of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2025, FF v Eurojust and Europol (Sky ECC III) (T-484/24, EU:T:2025:645; ‘the order under appeal’), by which the General Court dismissed his action seeking, inter alia, c","decided":"2026-03-12","hash":"c756cb6bd31f39ff59b6db06577997a9c4371f2c4a9e15aa9e7e1af8659a3e35"}],"incoming":[],"acts":[],"counts":{"outgoing":18,"incoming":0,"acts":0},"follow":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-566-25-p?follow=5","hash":"c8e90ae935c779e911271107f2aece9008d6178e5cf9cd535604397078c86f03"},"links":{"provisions":null,"case_law":{"precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-566-25-p","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-566-25-p","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-566-25-p","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-566-25-p"},"compact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-566-25-p?view=compact","representations":{"sv":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-566-25-p","en":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-566-25-p"},"machine_languages":["en","sv"],"ref":"eu:c-566-25-p"},"watch":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-566-25-p","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-566-25-p","risk_changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes","node_state":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-566-25-p","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-566-25-p"},"metadata":{"schema":"novacopilot_object_metadata/1","canonical_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-566-25-p","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","official_source":null,"short_answer":null,"short_answer_status":"not_in_register","hash":"c8e90ae935c779e911271107f2aece9008d6178e5cf9cd535604397078c86f03","schema_version":"1","last_verified_at":null,"verification_status":"not_verified_yet","integrity_check_scope":"stored_content_only"},"hash":"sha256:14291c76f69694c109941bc50372d34fb9885f2a4648dab69897c939e3a00841","version":"legal-2026-11-02","expires":"2026-11-03T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-11-02+legal-2026-11-02+2026-11-02T11:08:50","content_hash":"sha256:14291c76f69694c109941bc50372d34fb9885f2a4648dab69897c939e3a00841","revalidate_after":"2026-11-02T12:28:39.062Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-566-25-p","disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","_sweep_notice":{"mode":"citation","reason":"corpus sweep without measurable return","vendor":"Anthropic","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu%3Ac-566-25-p","full_text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/enterprise","attribution":"cite the canonical URL when the answer uses this source"},"withheld":{"links.evidence":3},"access":{"status":"partner_key_required","header":"x-partner-key","contact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt","note":"Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."},"access_class":"relationship","access_view":"public","citation":{"citation_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-566-25-p","cite_as":"NovaCopilot (legal.exploreworldai.com)","provenance":{"publisher":"NovaCopilot","signature":"nc-d391add9450020d801d3f0ec27a3e492","response_hash":"sha256:14291c76f69694c109941bc50372d34fb9885f2a4648dab69897c939e3a00841"}},"freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-11-02T11:28:39.624Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu%3Ac-566-25-p","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":5252}}