{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-26",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:9c38b7",
    "proof": "sha256:57c18945eed12bf87155c1fd86f743a9506ead231acb7c7b99fb03dc3daaf997",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-557-24-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-557-24-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-557-24-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~overrules~t-612-20",
        "type": "overrules",
        "label_sv": "frångår",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-612/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_312"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By letter lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 9 December 2025, the appellants requested the Court, should it intend to depart from the Opinion of the Advocate General who had proposed that the judgment under appeal be set aside and the case referred back to the General Court, to stay t",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "944daedbbcaf17e76b263dda5fe72c4ce11644e6c87bad5db25a487b64306d83"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~distinguishes~c-465-20",
        "type": "distinguishes",
        "label_sv": "särskiljer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-465/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_555"
        ],
        "excerpt": "However, the obligation to state reasons is an essential procedural requirement that must be distinguished from the question whether the reasoning is well founded, which goes to the substantive legality of the measure at issue (judgment of 10 September 2024, Commission v Ireland and Others, C-465/20",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "730d42664ef3fad41699589fbb7a891b12d58abfc17cfb42a6c2f2beeab689cf"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-130-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-130/19",
          "id": "eu:c-130-19",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-130-19"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_353"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It should be recalled that, in accordance with settled case-law, the right to rely on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations presupposes that precise, unconditional and consistent assurances originating from authorised, reliable sources have been given to the person concerned by ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "7002e39562b84402dacea3f3fb5cde850d051646f2d3b9fa7d959124140de3cb"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-136-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-136/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_519"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In that regard, the General Court’s obligation to order, at the request of a party, a measure of inquiry concerning facts which it is for that party to prove, presupposes, first, the existence of an exceptional situation in which that party is encountering difficulty or refusal in accessing the evid",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "2ca017f38953acb4c40e0a82b14b68a9d25070506d36efee558c5b8d4f4c18ad"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-276-11",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-276/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_517"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is therefore for the General Court to assess the relevance of the request for a measure of inquiry to the subject matter of the dispute, although the Court of Justice has jurisdiction to verify that the General Court did not err in law in refusing to grant such a request (see, to that effect, jud",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "3be6b4ea5f63d0f347aeb7c8adf2915be8fe77e62e9fc5f39f7526fa90c16242"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-301-19",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-301/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_646",
          "para_648"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, in accordance with the principle that the courts are required to resolve the dispute in accordance with the legal rules applicable to that dispute, it is for the General Court, on the basis of the facts put forward in the application, to characterise, without however altering the subject matte",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "5056beae904b9d82940e853a348561b1c216911e77f9e65d45efc7b2bd3a2542"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-440-18",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-440/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_517"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It is therefore for the General Court to assess the relevance of the request for a measure of inquiry to the subject matter of the dispute, although the Court of Justice has jurisdiction to verify that the General Court did not err in law in refusing to grant such a request (see, to that effect, jud",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "9906b62c853315339237980a2e7fed4c95ab7ced2e5e13a84aa8f4ed454ec4e4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-59-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-59/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_652"
        ],
        "excerpt": "That being pointed out, it should be borne in mind that, according to settled case-law, if the grounds of a judgment of the General Court disclose an infringement of EU law but the operative part of that judgment is shown to be well founded on other legal grounds, such an infringement cannot lead to",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "eeb0dcccb8c0f1ff7c21cc2fb6780a8190936ecd2f310c154f53cc51dcb7a0b2"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-649-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-649/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_536",
          "para_538"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Given that, by the fifth part, the appellants criticise the General Court for having failed to rule on an argument they raised before it, it should be noted that the General Court’s failure to rule on a plea or argument raised before it constitutes a breach of the obligation to state reasons (see, t",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "7b7c7cfd6a8b7072e28f4d2e5e22c6b183f61d79f01654cf60187523721e90f6"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-658-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-658/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_536",
          "para_538"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Given that, by the fifth part, the appellants criticise the General Court for having failed to rule on an argument they raised before it, it should be noted that the General Court’s failure to rule on a plea or argument raised before it constitutes a breach of the obligation to state reasons (see, t",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "151724855491470ee7b80d2a83d262a13d62271ac962720fe5f56f01e9075a78"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-662-20",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-662/20",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_536",
          "para_538"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Given that, by the fifth part, the appellants criticise the General Court for having failed to rule on an argument they raised before it, it should be noted that the General Court’s failure to rule on a plea or argument raised before it constitutes a breach of the obligation to state reasons (see, t",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "cf5ad8c4e3e9c129f53a8251a03aa66ab579a00b355f56a59feaacb1339a7ea3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-777-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-777/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_471",
          "para_699",
          "para_705"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Therefore, the appellants argument directed against paragraph 115 of the judgment under appeal must be rejected as ineffective since it concerns a ground included for the sake of completeness in that judgment, the operative part of which is substantiated to the requisite legal standard by other grou",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "26f51c8b784e205de59f4f9af42498c772b0fc3247efae510927e796d9d4ead5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~follows~c-789-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-789/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_471",
          "para_699",
          "para_705"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Therefore, the appellants argument directed against paragraph 115 of the judgment under appeal must be rejected as ineffective since it concerns a ground included for the sake of completeness in that judgment, the operative part of which is substantiated to the requisite legal standard by other grou",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "45fd2b2c84c7f9f523dc95b459449b437013ce6da8a556ef7b17a925593e64fb"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-364-23",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-364/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_328",
          "para_332"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By contrast, when the General Court has found or assessed the facts, the Court of Justice has jurisdiction to review the legal characterisation of those facts by the General Court and the legal conclusions it has drawn from them (judgment of 12 June 2025, ZR v EUIPO, C-364/23 P , EU:C:2025:428 , par",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "2349e2f308b666811722fcb5e83484495ae292146ff822a96013ca45d0234e59"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-419-08",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-419/08",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_862"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Since the three conditions giving rise to liability laid down in the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU must be satisfied cumulatively, the fact that one of them has not been satisfied is a sufficient basis on which to dismiss an action for damages (judgment of 18 March 2010, Trubowest Handel and ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "dc81d339fe6e5491e173f069e9fab5d33bddeb90f636b6c5b4617f2b3e96a4d3"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-5-94",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-5/94",
          "id": "eu:c-5-94",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-5-94"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_496"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In addition, they complain that the General Court did not grant their request to order the preparation of ‘a technical expert’s report designed to establish and compare the situation of other banks in relation to the difference in treatment adopted by the ECB’ and that it disregarded the judgment of",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "7cc92ceb5b64c2c2a354ccb21529550fd98b8c02246021ebc7c13df6475f6ec1"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-514-07",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-514/07",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_646"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Although the EU judicature must rule only on the heads of claim put forward by the parties, whose role it is to define the framework of the dispute, it cannot confine itself to the arguments put forward by the parties in support of their claims, or it might be forced, in some circumstances, to base ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "981ab025201bd53c09ad089661d26cc1cf52608902e51e70146f27628ad8c75a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-528-07",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-528/07",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_646"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Although the EU judicature must rule only on the heads of claim put forward by the parties, whose role it is to define the framework of the dispute, it cannot confine itself to the arguments put forward by the parties in support of their claims, or it might be forced, in some circumstances, to base ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "59cd52fa4f5dcebfd34f9d3e63e1902525183186c78ef407618533efd4a24d99"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-532-07",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-532/07",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_646"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Although the EU judicature must rule only on the heads of claim put forward by the parties, whose role it is to define the framework of the dispute, it cannot confine itself to the arguments put forward by the parties in support of their claims, or it might be forced, in some circumstances, to base ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "6b003508d60aadde37df5bae1a379f8d1612c86fbe0fa6a68d4c407b6eb17941"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-557-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-557/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_5"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-557/24 P,",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "52a1699c3873a17e1d4fa71335bcba984e4c8bf8a2e75a836d64cf8fe8409615"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-588-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-588/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_513"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In the second place, in so far as the appellants complain that the General Court, in essence, erred in law as regards the allocation of the burden of proof, it must be borne in mind that, according to the case-law of the Court, it is in principle for the person who alleges facts in support of a clai",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "aa5d4bfeb435704980df176b6840ae0ce619bdae6d855d076c441b2a4342b9d8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-597-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-597/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_503"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Chrysostomides & Co. and Others, C-597/18 P, C-598/18 P, C-603/18 P and C-604/18 P , EU:C:2020:1028 , paragraphs 191 and 192 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "40c4ce43df544790dc54bcd6118d97502244a6e11089d812da8920d1d422622c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-598-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-598/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_503"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Chrysostomides & Co. and Others, C-597/18 P, C-598/18 P, C-603/18 P and C-604/18 P , EU:C:2020:1028 , paragraphs 191 and 192 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "0883eeb1cbac5fa7ea86246ce0f14b855ffd133743643646e0e60d14669d7097"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-603-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-603/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_503"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Chrysostomides & Co. and Others, C-597/18 P, C-598/18 P, C-603/18 P and C-604/18 P , EU:C:2020:1028 , paragraphs 191 and 192 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "7e992647a483a2b9b8b23832e567b993511b335d970cdc7fcd32fec95f4d8b92"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-604-18",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-604/18",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_503"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Chrysostomides & Co. and Others, C-597/18 P, C-598/18 P, C-603/18 P and C-604/18 P , EU:C:2020:1028 , paragraphs 191 and 192 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "d32445a64b4df38836634be735b1ff751633eabbf3cee08c9ecd5ad144f18f09"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-680-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-680/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_324",
          "para_326"
        ],
        "excerpt": "It follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely the contes",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "959d2acbdef98bb1fc6e3a0d5eab59305579de942c81f949fa11d2303b92ee41"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~c-755-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-755/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_451",
          "para_453",
          "para_455",
          "para_457"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to the Court’s case-law, the European Union or one of its institutions such as the ECB may incur non-contractual liability under the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU only if a number of conditions are fulfilled, namely the existence of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law int",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "4f082371fe50ab6423fd20e15ee5239ca011212c097d53cfaa8881fff10b815f"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~t-134-21",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-134/21",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_25",
          "para_874"
        ],
        "excerpt": "By their appeal, Malacalza Investimenti Srl and Mr Vittoria Malacalza seek to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 5 June 2024, Malacalza Investimenti and Malacalza v ECB ( T-134/21 , EU:T:2024:362 ; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the General Court dismis",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "4c8cb2a511b2ca71670851fcc04930a56741f474868c54513eb8ad52fdb2a526"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-557-24-p~cites~t-502-19",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-557-24-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-502/19",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_674",
          "para_701",
          "para_705"
        ],
        "excerpt": "The appellants also complain that the General Court failed to examine other grounds of unlawfulness of the decision to place Banca Carige under temporary administration, both that which it itself acknowledged in the judgment of 12 October 2022, Corneli v ECB ( T-502/19 , EU:T:2022:627 ), which they ",
        "decided": "2026-05-21",
        "hash": "27843de0be8614ef31d604e96a44fb261c9e6b686bc99545a22d44e5989cd1ea"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 29,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "ad228815159df3f2c62541f133f94fb0ca43ffc5ab452141aeaabcdc10b8a481"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-557-24-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-557-24-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-557-24-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-557-24-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-557-24-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-557-24-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-557-24-p",
    "relations": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-557-24-p",
    "risk_changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes",
    "node_state": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-557-24-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-557-24-p"
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "ad228815159df3f2c62541f133f94fb0ca43ffc5ab452141aeaabcdc10b8a481",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:57c18945eed12bf87155c1fd86f743a9506ead231acb7c7b99fb03dc3daaf997",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-26",
  "expires": "2026-10-28T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-26+legal-2026-10-26+2026-10-26T21:17:09",
    "content_hash": "sha256:57c18945eed12bf87155c1fd86f743a9506ead231acb7c7b99fb03dc3daaf997",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-27T01:28:54.369Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-557-24-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}