{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "cite_as": "NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-396-25-p)",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-10-22",
    "fingerprint": "ewai:se:d88dd2",
    "proof": "sha256:773caa26928ae5345c835ccc833a0061fba3f8beccb1ac5824d01a96d644609d",
    "jurisdiction": "se",
    "lang": "en",
    "publisher": "NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal",
    "terms": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"
  },
  "brand_source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
  "object_type": "edge",
  "object_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p",
  "schema_version": "1",
  "schema": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-396-25-p",
  "judgment": {
    "id": "eu:c-396-25-p",
    "text": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-396-25-p"
  },
  "siblings": {
    "risk": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "relation": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "change": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "agent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "provenance": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "status": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "element": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "decision": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-396-25-p"
  },
  "source": "NovaCopilot",
  "precedent_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-396-25-p",
  "item": {
    "judgment": "eu:c-396-25-p",
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-111-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-111/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_180"
        ],
        "excerpt": "109 In that regard, it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely inter alia",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "bf4eeb1eac95d3fb0c9f6c35f321c774d50ec35142bdd94d05c9f63dbbffa1a5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-35-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-35/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_180"
        ],
        "excerpt": "109 In that regard, it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely inter alia",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "8ab26d53b1e70f19684cadae5d95d8843b7d6edf91a657ae474fd022dacb433c"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-369-22",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-369/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_136"
        ],
        "excerpt": "According to settled case-law, complaints directed against grounds included in a decision of the General Court purely for the sake of completeness cannot lead to the decision being set aside and are therefore ineffective (judgment of 26 February 2026, Air France v Commission , C-369/22 P, EU:C:2026:",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "dddf4010f5f3733ed782dae110dd5064ff54e630f787e742e588badedcbef560"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-477-24",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-477/24",
          "id": "eu:c-477-24",
          "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-477-24"
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_100"
        ],
        "excerpt": "47 However, although it is true that an infringement of the right to sound administration may be found only at the end of an appropriate action, the procedure leading to the adoption of an act capable of being the subject of an action, including when it comprises preparatory acts, must comply with t",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "1a912244535376ba6a2524731e171e16cbfd51f9d7f7a0aa78b5e5c38cca57e7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-51-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-51/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_80"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Such a reply confers on the applicant the right, provided for in Article 7(2) of that regulation, to repeat an application for access notwithstanding a first reasoned refusal and allows the EU institution concerned to reconsider its initial position before taking a final refusal decision, which coul",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "f0cf2303dfab2bcfd3d01c300ff7de38c819ee3c248c3e1f5daf84af8f1058c9"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-696-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-696/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_180"
        ],
        "excerpt": "109 In that regard, it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely inter alia",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "56415fe6935cfc23bec8afd16d3b0f6c38fb1683401de207ee2619706ad5dbf5"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-704-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-704/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_180"
        ],
        "excerpt": "109 In that regard, it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely inter alia",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "16b9fc25f93fa027718221850567fac2e4e13397a9e3a14df56e96043b40ed69"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-711-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-711/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_180"
        ],
        "excerpt": "109 In that regard, it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice that an appeal must indicate precisely inter alia",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "02e5d5467262776467694b61307b7165cf873f807bb981ad006a9ae50bc570e2"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~follows~c-97-23",
        "type": "follows",
        "label_sv": "följer",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-97/23",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_83",
          "para_84"
        ],
        "excerpt": "30 Moreover, according to settled case-law, in order to determine whether an act produces such effects and may, accordingly, form the subject matter of an action for annulment under Article 263 TFEU, it is necessary to examine the substance of that act and to assess those effects in the light of obj",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "18703fb81f902fba9193aa342cd4379688190a19f71716cf1027d0065f7415ad"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~cites~c-127-13",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-127/13",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_98"
        ],
        "excerpt": "45 The reasons for the order under appeal referred to in paragraph 43 of the present judgment are compatible with the Court’s case-law according to which it flows from the principle of proportionality that the institutions may, in particular cases in which the volume of documents for which access is",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "7663d75bb6034bca84c1e29ac03e9b7f23a2358123b856c98b66cd7f0d85ecbe"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~cites~c-208-11",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-208/11",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_81"
        ],
        "excerpt": "28 Consequently, as correctly observed by the General Court in paragraph 26 of the order under appeal, only the measure adopted by the Commission in response to a confirmatory application, which replaces the initial statement of position, is a decision and is capable of producing legal effects such ",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "24f2f5c7ba4f86e9071c985fa83e9f15f47c5979ccae6ac5822050cb3cb58189"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~cites~c-382-22",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-382/22",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_148"
        ],
        "excerpt": "Thus, it is not sufficient to show that a document could be interpreted differently from the interpretation adopted by the General Court (judgment of 26 February 2026, Cathay Pacific Airways v Commission , C-382/22 P, EU:C:2026:129, paragraph 70 and the case-law cited).",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "8bf20924c32ff3f095a9fe2723729a7e934b96d2c5ada2c56b368a7e5bc5d12a"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~cites~c-396-25",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-396/25",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_4",
          "para_54"
        ],
        "excerpt": "In Case C-396/25 P,",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "f036b588ab5dfb0b7f78fe265d658cba5b18e68a7679ebf8a59e989ec48fa7e4"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~cites~c-626-10",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "C-626/10",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_161"
        ],
        "excerpt": "96 In paragraph 25 of the order under appeal it is stated, with reference to paragraph 94 of the order of 10 November 2011, Agapiou Joséphidès v Commission and EACEA (C-626/10 P, EU:C:2011:726), and to the case-law cited, that the making of a confirmatory application must enable the institution conc",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "474a64352e6df0a2c94e015f89327cccbb88df6bffbca834022a4f5a7547b8a8"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~cites~t-11-16",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-11/16",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_75",
          "para_90"
        ],
        "excerpt": "23 By the seventh part of the sole ground of appeal, the appellant submits that, in paragraphs 29 and 30 of the order under appeal, the General Court incorrectly based its line of legal argument on paragraphs 47 and 48 of the order of 7 June 2017, De Masi v Commission (T-11/16, EU:T:2017:385), which",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "444f70dc78ec2930c63b5dc4ea517788af599e88ccae4b22a1656cc68ddb4ad7"
      },
      {
        "edge_id": "edge:eu:c-396-25-p~cites~t-353-24",
        "type": "cites",
        "label_sv": "hänvisar till",
        "from": "eu:c-396-25-p",
        "to": {
          "ref": "T-353/24",
          "id": null,
          "url": null
        },
        "paragraph_ids": [
          "para_19"
        ],
        "excerpt": "1 By her appeal, Ms Alexandra Molitorisová seeks to have set aside the order of 14 April 2025 of the General Court of the European Union, Molitorisová v Commission (T-353/24, ‘the order under appeal’, EU:T:2025:412), by which that court dismissed her action seeking annulment of the European Commissi",
        "decided": "2026-06-04",
        "hash": "7867887f295e7ed895d45cb44724c48d869ef73f55e10cb8071925a772d7b049"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": [],
    "acts": [],
    "counts": {
      "outgoing": 16,
      "incoming": 0,
      "acts": 0
    },
    "follow": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-396-25-p?follow=5",
    "hash": "acd66a44f2f7e702d4d1dcd5ade645711629d19b6f0f83e7701b8ee3cb2f5164"
  },
  "links": {
    "provisions": null,
    "case_law": {
      "precedent": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-396-25-p",
      "conflict": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-396-25-p",
      "citation_graph": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-396-25-p",
      "weight": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-396-25-p"
    },
    "compact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-396-25-p?view=compact",
    "representations": {
      "sv": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-396-25-p",
      "en": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-396-25-p"
    },
    "machine_languages": [
      "en",
      "sv"
    ],
    "ref": "eu:c-396-25-p"
  },
  "watch": {
    "changes": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/changes",
    "whats_new": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/whats-new?jurisdiction=eu",
    "conditional": "Send If-None-Match with the ETag; unchanged objects return 304 without body.",
    "recheck_after_seconds": 86400
  },
  "metadata": {
    "schema": "novacopilot_object_metadata/1",
    "canonical_url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-396-25-p",
    "source": "Source: NovaCopilot",
    "official_source": null,
    "short_answer": null,
    "short_answer_status": "not_in_register",
    "hash": "acd66a44f2f7e702d4d1dcd5ade645711629d19b6f0f83e7701b8ee3cb2f5164",
    "schema_version": "1",
    "last_verified_at": null,
    "verification_status": "not_verified_yet",
    "integrity_check_scope": "stored_content_only"
  },
  "hash": "sha256:773caa26928ae5345c835ccc833a0061fba3f8beccb1ac5824d01a96d644609d",
  "version": "legal-2026-10-22",
  "expires": "2026-10-23T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-10-22+legal-2026-10-22+2026-10-22T16:20:29",
    "content_hash": "sha256:773caa26928ae5345c835ccc833a0061fba3f8beccb1ac5824d01a96d644609d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-10-22T19:12:14.376Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; attribution-preferred",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-396-25-p",
  "disclaimer": "Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.",
  "content_notice": {
    "legal_advice": false,
    "nature": "Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.",
    "kinds": {
      "official_text": "Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted",
      "summary": "Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text",
      "classification": "Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"
    },
    "rule": "Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.",
    "report_error": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections",
    "ai_act_declaration": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"
  },
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering",
  "withheld": {
    "links.evidence": 3
  },
  "access": {
    "status": "partner_key_required",
    "header": "x-partner-key",
    "contact": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt",
    "note": "Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."
  },
  "access_class": "relationship",
  "access_view": "public"
}